PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon review
GALAX HOF Pro PCIe 4.0 NVMe review
How to: Firmware Update the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Z review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT OC review
ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5600 XT TOP review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming OC review
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
Team Group T-Force 4133 MHz 16GB DDR4 review
Posted by: on: 07/18/2019 11:01 AM [
7 comment(s) ]
We review an XTREEM 16GB kit from Team Group. The T-Force 4133 MHz 16GB memory is cool, fast and runs XMP 2.0 memory profiles on Intel platforms as well. Join us as we review some of the fastest clocked bars of memory your money can get you.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
teamgroup
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36842
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36842
Posted on: 07/18/2019 01:45 PM
That is correct, the review was prior to Ryzen 3000. I've not had the time to looks ta it with R3000 due to the many and ongoing embargo reviews.
Nice RAM and review - however, no Ryzen 3k performance/testing? That would've been interesting. But I guess maybe this was conducted before that NDA was released or the reviewer did not have a CPU in house for it.
That is correct, the review was prior to Ryzen 3000. I've not had the time to looks ta it with R3000 due to the many and ongoing embargo reviews.
FranciscoCL
Senior Member
Posts: 207
Senior Member
Posts: 207
Posted on: 07/18/2019 05:19 PM
Thanks for the review.
As usual, little or no benefit in games compared to cheaper options.
--
On page 13 it says "Dota 2 / FireStorm". It should be "Dota 2 / FireStrike".
This also happens in some previous reviews, like this one:
https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/g-skill-tridentz-royal-ddr4-3200-mhz-review,13.html
Thanks for the review.
As usual, little or no benefit in games compared to cheaper options.
--
On page 13 it says "Dota 2 / FireStorm". It should be "Dota 2 / FireStrike".
This also happens in some previous reviews, like this one:
https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/g-skill-tridentz-royal-ddr4-3200-mhz-review,13.html
Devid
Member
Posts: 30
Member
Posts: 30
Posted on: 07/18/2019 07:32 PM
I've got exactly the same memory modules in my PC.
I can confirm that it is impossible to go above 3900MHz with ASUS Hero X (Z370).
After a little time of tweaking I finally found them stable at 3900MHz 16-16-16-35 tRAS 350@1.45V
It is actually not bad at all but would have been better if these kit had simply gone on XMP with my motherboard.
I've got exactly the same memory modules in my PC.
I can confirm that it is impossible to go above 3900MHz with ASUS Hero X (Z370).
After a little time of tweaking I finally found them stable at 3900MHz 16-16-16-35 tRAS 350@1.45V
It is actually not bad at all but would have been better if these kit had simply gone on XMP with my motherboard.
SniperX
Member
Posts: 87
Member
Posts: 87
Posted on: 07/19/2019 12:04 PM
Why not give these memory modules a fair chance at the rated XMP speed by testing them on the 9900K/ASRock Z390?
Why not give these memory modules a fair chance at the rated XMP speed by testing them on the 9900K/ASRock Z390?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36842
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36842
Posted on: 07/19/2019 12:34 PM
Coz all test results are based on the 8700K platform. So that would mean we have nothing to compare to.
Why not give these memory modules a fair chance at the rated XMP speed by testing them on the 9900K/ASRock Z390?
Coz all test results are based on the 8700K platform. So that would mean we have nothing to compare to.
SniperX
Member
Posts: 87
Member
Posts: 87
Posted on: 07/19/2019 01:10 PM
Sure, I understand that, but you need to be able to test high speed modules on a more dependable system. I would be ok with it if you mix the results like you do for gaming benchmarks in the GPU reviews (5960X / 9900K)... at least until the 8700K is phased out. Now or later, a platform shift is inevitable. My two cents
Coz all test results are based on the 8700K platform. So that would mean we have nothing to compare to.
Sure, I understand that, but you need to be able to test high speed modules on a more dependable system. I would be ok with it if you mix the results like you do for gaming benchmarks in the GPU reviews (5960X / 9900K)... at least until the 8700K is phased out. Now or later, a platform shift is inevitable. My two cents
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 498
Nice RAM and review - however, no Ryzen 3k performance/testing? That would've been interesting. But I guess maybe this was conducted before that NDA was released or the reviewer did not have a CPU in house for it.