Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Seagate ARCHIVE 8TB HDD review



We review the Seagate ARCHIVE 8 TB HDD. Though SSDs are the thing to purchase these days, if you need massive bulk volume storage then you'll need a HDD. We are not disappointed at all in regards to price and value for money.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
seagate
« ASUS Z170 ROG Maximus VIII Formula review · Seagate ARCHIVE 8TB HDD review
· G.Skill TridentZ 3200 MHz DDR4 memory review »
pages 1 2 3 4
Clawedge
Senior Member
Posts: 2599
Senior Member
Posts: 2599
Posted on: 04/15/2017 01:56 AM
thanks for the review would appreciate hdtune benchamark where it shows write speeds from start to end so we can see write speeds on the inner track
thanks for the review would appreciate hdtune benchamark where it shows write speeds from start to end so we can see write speeds on the inner track
pages 1 2 3 4
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6643
When reading the reviews on Tomsitpro and Storagereview they refer to Seagate saying: "Seagate does not recommended utilizing these drives in RAID or NAS environments".
I'm curious as i'm thinking of buying these for a NAS.
Even though your question is a little old now, I would suggest not getting them for NAS. As I just posted, the surveillance drives seem to be better built for not only 24/7 operation like the archive drives, but constant use also.
(Well blow me, on the bottom of the HDD, etched into the plastic base is the word recertified, did they just send me a second hand HDD to repleace my 3 month old faulty one?)
Only Seagate can answer exactly what drive you got, but if you asked they probably wouldn't tell you! It's possibly a RMA that was perfectly fine, or a factory second that they repaired. It would be interesting to know how many RMA's manufacturers receive, I wouldn't be surprise if a large majority of things people RMA as faulty are probably perfectly fine. It's okay though, they can recover that cost through bumping up the sale cost slightly