Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB review




It is time to look at the 4GB version of the Radeon RX 5500 XT. We review the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB model, AMD's new mainstream GPU posed to be AMD's king of 1920x1080 resolution gaming.
Read article
Advertisement
« Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review · Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB review
· Guru3D Winter 2019 PC Buyer Guide »
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Posted on: 12/12/2019 04:27 PM
Cmon, not all gaming on 4K with heavy mods (and this card is best for HD reso). There youtube reviews comparing 2GB with 4GB and there no difference in most benches.
The 4GB version should not exist.
Cmon, not all gaming on 4K with heavy mods (and this card is best for HD reso). There youtube reviews comparing 2GB with 4GB and there no difference in most benches.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 18935
Senior Member
Posts: 18935
Posted on: 12/12/2019 04:32 PM
I though this card competes with 1650S but its fast as 1660 and rx590. Im surprised.
I though this card competes with 1650S but its fast as 1660 and rx590. Im surprised.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
Posted on: 12/12/2019 04:33 PM
Look at this review. The 4GB version is 5-22 FPS slower in 1080p games.
And the vulcan results in RDR2 are horrible. Looks like AMD has some work to do.
Cmon, not all gaming on 4K with heavy mods (and this card is best for HD reso). There youtube reviews comparing 2GB with 4GB and there no difference in most benches.
Look at this review. The 4GB version is 5-22 FPS slower in 1080p games.
And the vulcan results in RDR2 are horrible. Looks like AMD has some work to do.
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Posted on: 12/12/2019 04:34 PM
Look at this review. The 4GB version is 5-22 FPS slower in 1080p games.
And the vulcan results in RDR2 are horrible. Looks like AMD has some work to do.
Guess I have to catch up with times. but damn, Gears of Wars just punishes low memory!
Look at this review. The 4GB version is 5-22 FPS slower in 1080p games.
And the vulcan results in RDR2 are horrible. Looks like AMD has some work to do.
Guess I have to catch up with times. but damn, Gears of Wars just punishes low memory!
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
The 4GB version should not exist.