Cooler Master MasterBox Q500L review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Advanced OC review
ASRock Z390 Steel Legend review
Corsair M55 RGB PRO gaming mouse review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Lexar NM600 NVMe M.2. SSD (480GB) review
Tech preview: Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT
Tech preview: AMD Ryzen 3000 - 7nm ZEN2
Patriot Viper VPN100 M2 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe M.2. (1TB) SSD review
Posted by: on: 01/22/2019 05:00 PM [
22 comment(s) ]
Samsung outs a new TURBO edition of the M.2. EVO drives, AS IF they were not fast enough, they improved writes allowing R/W up to 3500/3300 MB/s thanks to the latest 3bit written NAND and a new Phoenix controller.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
samsung
tunejunky
Senior Member
Posts: 875
Senior Member
Posts: 875
Posted on: 01/22/2019 05:25 PM
great review. really nice M.2
as much as i love tech, i hate buying something and 3 months later....
lolz
great review. really nice M.2
as much as i love tech, i hate buying something and 3 months later....
lolz
clamatac
Member
Posts: 44
Member
Posts: 44
Posted on: 01/22/2019 06:29 PM
thanks for the review
Manufacturers should include a heatsink like the one mentioned in the "New WD Black: SN750 NVMe SSD"
thanks for the review
Manufacturers should include a heatsink like the one mentioned in the "New WD Black: SN750 NVMe SSD"
Incredible Lama
Senior Member
Posts: 125
Senior Member
Posts: 125
Posted on: 01/22/2019 06:30 PM
I think you just reviewed my future main drive
.
Now I'm just wondering whether I should go with a single 1000GB drive or two seperate 500GB drives (one for OS and programs, and one for games)
I think you just reviewed my future main drive
.Now I'm just wondering whether I should go with a single 1000GB drive or two seperate 500GB drives (one for OS and programs, and one for games)
DeskStar
Senior Member
Posts: 541
Senior Member
Posts: 541
Posted on: 01/22/2019 08:34 PM
@Hilbert
Just noticed on page ten of the real world trace testing you mentioned...
"It seems the SSD is a trace test wonder, definitely offering extraordinary performance, look at how these storage units put the traditional HDD to shame"
should it state traditional SSD?
@Hilbert
Just noticed on page ten of the real world trace testing you mentioned...
"It seems the SSD is a trace test wonder, definitely offering extraordinary performance, look at how these storage units put the traditional HDD to shame"
should it state traditional SSD?
nizzen
Senior Member
Posts: 625
Senior Member
Posts: 625
Posted on: 01/22/2019 08:58 PM
@Hilbert Hagedoorn
Do you know where samsung z-nand is? It was "press released" 1 year ago!
Samsung SZ985 Z-NAND SSD
https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-electronics-launches-800-gigabyte-z-ssd-for-hpc-systems-and-ai-applications
@Hilbert Hagedoorn
Do you know where samsung z-nand is? It was "press released" 1 year ago!
Samsung SZ985 Z-NAND SSD
https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-electronics-launches-800-gigabyte-z-ssd-for-hpc-systems-and-ai-applications
The Goose
Senior Member
Posts: 2205
Senior Member
Posts: 2205
Posted on: 01/22/2019 09:03 PM
this should of been given the same 1200tb endurance as the 970 pro.
this should of been given the same 1200tb endurance as the 970 pro.
valentyn0
Senior Member
Posts: 108
Senior Member
Posts: 108
Posted on: 01/22/2019 10:49 PM
Pro uses MLC not TLC, that's why EVO wont get that much endurance.
this should of been given the same 1200tb endurance as the 970 pro.
Pro uses MLC not TLC, that's why EVO wont get that much endurance.
felix_w
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Posted on: 01/23/2019 10:34 AM
Good and extensive review!
However, in the page of AS-SSD results, the screenshot is from 970 EVO 500GB drive.
Herbert,if possible, upload the correct from 970 EVO Plus 1TB drive.
Thank you
Good and extensive review!
However, in the page of AS-SSD results, the screenshot is from 970 EVO 500GB drive.
Herbert,if possible, upload the correct from 970 EVO Plus 1TB drive.
Thank you
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35337
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35337
Posted on: 01/23/2019 10:45 AM
Well, that had me confused for a minute. I rechecked and it is the new Plus SSD.
AS SSD is listing the drive as EVO 500GB, it, in fact, is the EVO Plus 1TB as you can see from the 1B2Q device name. I guess Samsung re-used a firmware. You'll notice similar behaviour in the Anvil benchmark.
However, in the page of AS-SSD results, the screenshot is from 970 EVO 500GB drive.
Well, that had me confused for a minute. I rechecked and it is the new Plus SSD.
AS SSD is listing the drive as EVO 500GB, it, in fact, is the EVO Plus 1TB as you can see from the 1B2Q device name. I guess Samsung re-used a firmware. You'll notice similar behaviour in the Anvil benchmark.
Clawedge
Senior Member
Posts: 2381
Senior Member
Posts: 2381
Posted on: 01/23/2019 12:19 PM
The Samsung website mentions ram cache as ddr4 instead of ddr3 as stated in the review
The Samsung website mentions ram cache as ddr4 instead of ddr3 as stated in the review
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35337
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35337
Posted on: 01/23/2019 01:52 PM
Thanks, I've been able to confirm that it indeed is LPDDR4. The entry has been updated to reflect that.
The Samsung website mentions ram cache as ddr4 instead of ddr3 as stated in the review
Thanks, I've been able to confirm that it indeed is LPDDR4. The entry has been updated to reflect that.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35337
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35337
Posted on: 01/23/2019 01:53 PM
@Hilbert Hagedoorn
Do you know where samsung z-nand is? It was "press released" 1 year ago!
Samsung SZ985 Z-NAND SSD
https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-electronics-launches-800-gigabyte-z-ssd-for-hpc-systems-and-ai-applications
No, not really, it's enterprise gear though, so if sold that would be in completely different distribution channels.
@Hilbert Hagedoorn
Do you know where samsung z-nand is? It was "press released" 1 year ago!
Samsung SZ985 Z-NAND SSD
https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-electronics-launches-800-gigabyte-z-ssd-for-hpc-systems-and-ai-applications
No, not really, it's enterprise gear though, so if sold that would be in completely different distribution channels.
Clawedge
Senior Member
Posts: 2381
Senior Member
Posts: 2381
Posted on: 01/23/2019 06:49 PM
Still says ddr3 on page one in the table
Thanks, I've been able to confirm that it indeed is LPDDR4. The entry has been updated to reflect that.
Still says ddr3 on page one in the table
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 931
Senior Member
Posts: 931
Posted on: 01/23/2019 08:48 PM
Yep, although I wanted to see some competition out of the traditional HDD makers, doesn't look as if that's going to happen. Currently, the HDD is still king for raw capacity and price per GB, but HDDs are sort of sitting at the bottom of their pricing ramp while the price of NVMe continues on a sharp downward slope even as capacities and performance and longevity continue to rise! I saw an ad the other day for a 500GB 970 EVO NVMe for ~$120--'bout what I paid for me 250GB 960 EVO NVMe boot drive. (Drat, lost the link as I was hunting for something else when I saw it! Hope I wasn't "seeing things"...
)
Well-done, informative review, HH--as usual! 14 comment(s)
Yep, although I wanted to see some competition out of the traditional HDD makers, doesn't look as if that's going to happen. Currently, the HDD is still king for raw capacity and price per GB, but HDDs are sort of sitting at the bottom of their pricing ramp while the price of NVMe continues on a sharp downward slope even as capacities and performance and longevity continue to rise! I saw an ad the other day for a 500GB 970 EVO NVMe for ~$120--'bout what I paid for me 250GB 960 EVO NVMe boot drive. (Drat, lost the link as I was hunting for something else when I saw it! Hope I wasn't "seeing things"...
)Well-done, informative review, HH--as usual! 14 comment(s)
SweenJM
Senior Member
Posts: 305
Senior Member
Posts: 305
Posted on: 01/24/2019 02:04 AM
Sata4 gets brought up a couple times here. So is sata dead? Sata-express has been around for a good while now, and has almost no adoption. Is sata 4 in the works? 3.3 is the newest sata revision i was aware of, but have not looked in quite some time.
Sata4 gets brought up a couple times here. So is sata dead? Sata-express has been around for a good while now, and has almost no adoption. Is sata 4 in the works? 3.3 is the newest sata revision i was aware of, but have not looked in quite some time.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9125
Senior Member
Posts: 9125
Posted on: 01/24/2019 06:17 PM
To be honest. I have seen sata3 drives corrupted because high quality data cable went too close to power delivery cable. I can't imagine how badly will sata4 work if it has to deliver competitive speeds. For me, it would have to move from theoretical 600MB/s to 2400MB/s to be somehow competitive. And doing that on just 2 data channels (4 data wires) seems rather difficult.
Sata4 gets brought up a couple times here. So is sata dead? Sata-express has been around for a good while now, and has almost no adoption. Is sata 4 in the works? 3.3 is the newest sata revision i was aware of, but have not looked in quite some time.
To be honest. I have seen sata3 drives corrupted because high quality data cable went too close to power delivery cable. I can't imagine how badly will sata4 work if it has to deliver competitive speeds. For me, it would have to move from theoretical 600MB/s to 2400MB/s to be somehow competitive. And doing that on just 2 data channels (4 data wires) seems rather difficult.
nizzen
Senior Member
Posts: 625
Senior Member
Posts: 625
Posted on: 01/25/2019 07:40 PM
SAS is doing the trick
SAS is doing the trick
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9125
Senior Member
Posts: 9125
Posted on: 01/26/2019 04:44 PM
Please elaborate on number of data pins required to achieve such bandwidth with SAS. Please add number of joined cables and images of solutions.
Calculate bandwidth per data pin and compare to SATA.
SAS is doing the trick
Please elaborate on number of data pins required to achieve such bandwidth with SAS. Please add number of joined cables and images of solutions.
Calculate bandwidth per data pin and compare to SATA.
Maye88
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Posted on: 02/03/2019 07:39 PM
THANK YOU!
For being the the only website I found which compared the 960 pro & evo and 970pro and evo to this drive. Every other major tech website neglected to include the pro versions!
Not only that but thank you for doing such in depth benchmarks.
THANK YOU!
For being the the only website I found which compared the 960 pro & evo and 970pro and evo to this drive. Every other major tech website neglected to include the pro versions!
Not only that but thank you for doing such in depth benchmarks.
clamatac
Member
Posts: 44
Member
Posts: 44
Posted on: 04/20/2019 01:15 PM
thanks for the review
I am buying one next week
thanks for the review
I am buying one next week
RavenMaster
Senior Member
Posts: 1016
Senior Member
Posts: 1016
Posted on: 04/20/2019 03:30 PM
Its a real shame Intel are dicks about adding VROC RAID 0 support other brands of M.2 drives. I wanted to pair up two Samsung 970 EVO 2TB M.2's on my EVGA Dark mobo but Intel just gave vague excuses and were actively blocking that function. The same M.2 drives paired up easily via CPU RAID 0 on my other Threadripper build. But for my EVGA Dark i had to buy Intel 760p 2TB M.2's to get VROC RAID 0 working on the X299 platform.
Its a real shame Intel are dicks about adding VROC RAID 0 support other brands of M.2 drives. I wanted to pair up two Samsung 970 EVO 2TB M.2's on my EVGA Dark mobo but Intel just gave vague excuses and were actively blocking that function. The same M.2 drives paired up easily via CPU RAID 0 on my other Threadripper build. But for my EVGA Dark i had to buy Intel 760p 2TB M.2's to get VROC RAID 0 working on the X299 platform.
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1769
Would be nice to review also Adata XPG SX8200 Pro.