MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT GamingX 8GB review
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT EVO 8GB review
PowerColor Radeon RX 5500 XT Red Dragon 8GB review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming 8GB review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB review
Zotac Gaming GTX 1650 Super review
Radeon Adrenalin 2020 Edition Driver Overview
Guru3D Winter 2019 PC Buyer Guide
Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Resident Evil 7 : PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 01/24/2017 03:15 PM [
72 comment(s) ]
We will look at Resident Evil 7 in a PC graphics performance and PC gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3
UZ7
Senior Member
Posts: 5497
Senior Member
Posts: 5497
Posted on: 01/24/2017 03:26 PM
Now to test them with the new drivers xD:
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=412303
Now to test them with the new drivers xD:
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=412303
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Posted on: 01/24/2017 03:55 PM
Okay the new NV driver severely impacts performance. I will update the result sets.
Okay the new NV driver severely impacts performance. I will update the result sets.
JonasBeckman
Senior Member
Posts: 15798
Senior Member
Posts: 15798
Posted on: 01/24/2017 03:58 PM
EDIT: Seems this was updated and as such this post is no longer important.
(Apparently the new Nvidia driver is causing some performance issues but the game itself might have some problems too.)
EDIT: Seems this was updated and as such this post is no longer important.
(Apparently the new Nvidia driver is causing some performance issues but the game itself might have some problems too.)
Dazz
Senior Member
Posts: 843
Senior Member
Posts: 843
Posted on: 01/24/2017 06:08 PM
LOL RX470 faster than a GTX 1070 now thats pretty fricking funny!
http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=28327
LOL RX470 faster than a GTX 1070 now thats pretty fricking funny!
http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=28327
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Posted on: 01/24/2017 06:21 PM
LOL RX470 faster than a GTX 1070 now thats pretty fricking funny!
http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=28327
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
LOL RX470 faster than a GTX 1070 now thats pretty fricking funny!
http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=28327
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
Prince Valiant
Senior Member
Posts: 694
Senior Member
Posts: 694
Posted on: 01/24/2017 06:32 PM
I wonder what doofus decided FXAA and TAA only was a good idea? I wish FXAA would go away already :S.
I wonder what doofus decided FXAA and TAA only was a good idea? I wish FXAA would go away already :S.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 12046
Senior Member
Posts: 12046
Posted on: 01/24/2017 06:35 PM
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
Indeed.
Even there is a few anomalies game performs and looks very good on wide range of cards.
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
Indeed.
Even there is a few anomalies game performs and looks very good on wide range of cards.
ivymike10mt
Senior Member
Posts: 228
Senior Member
Posts: 228
Posted on: 01/24/2017 07:38 PM
GTX 980Ti @ 4K performance look really bad.
GTX 980Ti @ 4K performance look really bad.
Monchis
Senior Member
Posts: 1304
Senior Member
Posts: 1304
Posted on: 01/24/2017 08:56 PM
My 950 dead in the water after 14 months, pos, maxwell gimping starts now
My 950 dead in the water after 14 months, pos, maxwell gimping starts now
PrMinisterGR
Senior Member
Posts: 7005
Senior Member
Posts: 7005
Posted on: 01/24/2017 10:05 PM
The game looks like it should run locked at 60 or something, or even less. Do we know what engine it uses?
The game looks like it should run locked at 60 or something, or even less. Do we know what engine it uses?
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 12046
Senior Member
Posts: 12046
Posted on: 01/24/2017 10:11 PM
It baffles me how good Hawaii is performing. That 390X is a beast.
It baffles me how good Hawaii is performing. That 390X is a beast.
Memorian
Senior Member
Posts: 2978
Senior Member
Posts: 2978
Posted on: 01/24/2017 10:37 PM
Something's happening, a bug or something. The game has nVIDIA features so it should perform at least a bit better on NV HW.
Something's happening, a bug or something. The game has nVIDIA features so it should perform at least a bit better on NV HW.
Corbus
Senior Member
Posts: 2354
Senior Member
Posts: 2354
Posted on: 01/25/2017 12:12 AM
I have other games running over 100 fps , when will they release a hotfix driver for those games to lower performance? I can't stand high frames
I have other games running over 100 fps , when will they release a hotfix driver for those games to lower performance? I can't stand high frames
siriq
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Posted on: 01/25/2017 12:29 AM
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
Hilbert, turn off shadow cache and do a benchmark with and without it. You will see the difference. Actually, you have done it with on so only off version has to be done
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
Hilbert, turn off shadow cache and do a benchmark with and without it. You will see the difference. Actually, you have done it with on so only off version has to be done
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36512
Posted on: 01/25/2017 06:42 AM
Update: added FCAT frametime results
Update: added FCAT frametime results
Darren Hodgson
Senior Member
Posts: 15833
Senior Member
Posts: 15833
Posted on: 01/25/2017 09:01 AM
What?!?!? The Radeon R9 390X is faster than the GTX 1080 at 2560x1440?
What?!?!? The Radeon R9 390X is faster than the GTX 1080 at 2560x1440?
Spets
Senior Member
Posts: 2986
Senior Member
Posts: 2986
Posted on: 01/25/2017 09:24 AM
What?!?!? The Radeon R9 390X is faster than the GTX 1080 at 2560x1440?
Did someone saw this?
A guy at Nvidia forums posted about a huge performance drop at RE7 with this new driver comparing with the latest one, is it real? Someone tested?
Old Guru3D benchmarks using 376.33: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/185647255028629505/273481000510554112/unknown.png
New Guru3D benchmarks using 378.49:
http://i.imgur.com/sl0TOfB.png
New "game ready" driver broke RE7 performance.
What?!?!? The Radeon R9 390X is faster than the GTX 1080 at 2560x1440?
Did someone saw this?
A guy at Nvidia forums posted about a huge performance drop at RE7 with this new driver comparing with the latest one, is it real? Someone tested?
Old Guru3D benchmarks using 376.33: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/185647255028629505/273481000510554112/unknown.png
New Guru3D benchmarks using 378.49:
http://i.imgur.com/sl0TOfB.png
New "game ready" driver broke RE7 performance.
Szaby59
Member
Posts: 85
Member
Posts: 85
Posted on: 01/25/2017 10:14 AM
Can you check the 970 or 980 or RX 470 4 GB frametimes ? Either the game is unplayable with 4 GB VRAM or the R9 Fury has it's own issues.
Update: added FCAT frametime results
Can you check the 970 or 980 or RX 470 4 GB frametimes ? Either the game is unplayable with 4 GB VRAM or the R9 Fury has it's own issues.
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 851
Senior Member
Posts: 851
Posted on: 01/25/2017 10:15 AM
Driver 376.60 give me much better performance i think. Or have the game better graphics with 378.49?
Driver 376.60 give me much better performance i think. Or have the game better graphics with 378.49?
Stormyandcold
Senior Member
Posts: 5235
Senior Member
Posts: 5235
Posted on: 01/25/2017 10:51 AM
Looks like a mess for benchmarking. Too unstable to draw any meaningful conclusions.
Looks like a mess for benchmarking. Too unstable to draw any meaningful conclusions.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 12046
Senior Member
Posts: 12046
Posted on: 01/25/2017 11:59 AM
How can a game ready driver broke the performance? HH said performance is all over the place and it could differ from benchmark to benchmark.
New "game ready" driver broke RE7 performance.
How can a game ready driver broke the performance? HH said performance is all over the place and it could differ from benchmark to benchmark.
Quixz
Senior Member
Posts: 1311
Senior Member
Posts: 1311
Posted on: 01/25/2017 12:04 PM
The 390X is a beast!
The 390X is a beast!
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16441
Senior Member
Posts: 16441
Posted on: 01/25/2017 12:20 PM
If you saw original benchmark with 376.60, then you would know 378.xx breaks it hard.
http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=5384652&postcount=26
pcgameshw did a review too, although it doesn't look so out of control there, they used same new r378.xx driver
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Resident-Evil-7-Biohazard-Spiel-57353/Specials/Benchmark-PC-Anforderungen-1219005/
How can a game ready driver broke the performance? HH said performance is all over the place and it could differ from benchmark to benchmark.
If you saw original benchmark with 376.60, then you would know 378.xx breaks it hard.
http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=5384652&postcount=26
pcgameshw did a review too, although it doesn't look so out of control there, they used same new r378.xx driver
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Resident-Evil-7-Biohazard-Spiel-57353/Specials/Benchmark-PC-Anforderungen-1219005/
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 851
Senior Member
Posts: 851
Posted on: 01/25/2017 12:31 PM
Maybe Guru3d test with Shadow cashe on?
Maybe Guru3d test with Shadow cashe on?
pages 1 2 3
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 152
How is the 970 faster than the 980? What the ...? lul