MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Gaming Z review
Palit GeForce RTX 2060 GamingPro OC review
Promo: MS Office 2016 Pro Plus Key For $31.5
Corsair IronClaw RGB mouse review
Corsair Harpoon RGB Wireless mouse review
Corsair M65 RGB ELITE game mouse review
GeForce RTX 2060 review (founder)
WD Black NVME SSD (1TB) Review
Seasonic Focus SGX-650 Power Supply review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - December 2018
Resident Evil 7 : PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 01/24/2017 03:15 PM [
72 comment(s) ]
We will look at Resident Evil 7 in a PC graphics performance and PC gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3
UZ7
Senior Member
Posts: 5439
Senior Member
Posts: 5439
Posted on: 01/24/2017 03:26 PM
Now to test them with the new drivers xD:
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=412303
Now to test them with the new drivers xD:
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=412303
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34200
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34200
Posted on: 01/24/2017 03:55 PM
Okay the new NV driver severely impacts performance. I will update the result sets.
Okay the new NV driver severely impacts performance. I will update the result sets.
JonasBeckman
Senior Member
Posts: 14795
Senior Member
Posts: 14795
Posted on: 01/24/2017 03:58 PM
EDIT: Seems this was updated and as such this post is no longer important.
(Apparently the new Nvidia driver is causing some performance issues but the game itself might have some problems too.)
EDIT: Seems this was updated and as such this post is no longer important.
(Apparently the new Nvidia driver is causing some performance issues but the game itself might have some problems too.)
Dazz
Senior Member
Posts: 711
Senior Member
Posts: 711
Posted on: 01/24/2017 06:08 PM
LOL RX470 faster than a GTX 1070 now thats pretty fricking funny!
http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=28327
LOL RX470 faster than a GTX 1070 now thats pretty fricking funny!
http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=28327
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34200
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34200
Posted on: 01/24/2017 06:21 PM
LOL RX470 faster than a GTX 1070 now thats pretty fricking funny!
http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=28327
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
LOL RX470 faster than a GTX 1070 now thats pretty fricking funny!
http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=28327
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
Prince Valiant
Senior Member
Posts: 645
Senior Member
Posts: 645
Posted on: 01/24/2017 06:32 PM
I wonder what doofus decided FXAA and TAA only was a good idea? I wish FXAA would go away already :S.
I wonder what doofus decided FXAA and TAA only was a good idea? I wish FXAA would go away already :S.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10008
Senior Member
Posts: 10008
Posted on: 01/24/2017 06:35 PM
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
Indeed.
Even there is a few anomalies game performs and looks very good on wide range of cards.
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
Indeed.
Even there is a few anomalies game performs and looks very good on wide range of cards.
ivymike10mt
Senior Member
Posts: 225
Senior Member
Posts: 225
Posted on: 01/24/2017 07:38 PM
GTX 980Ti @ 4K performance look really bad.
GTX 980Ti @ 4K performance look really bad.
Monchis
Senior Member
Posts: 1295
Senior Member
Posts: 1295
Posted on: 01/24/2017 08:56 PM
My 950 dead in the water after 14 months, pos, maxwell gimping starts now
My 950 dead in the water after 14 months, pos, maxwell gimping starts now
PrMinisterGR
Senior Member
Posts: 6970
Senior Member
Posts: 6970
Posted on: 01/24/2017 10:05 PM
The game looks like it should run locked at 60 or something, or even less. Do we know what engine it uses?
The game looks like it should run locked at 60 or something, or even less. Do we know what engine it uses?
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10008
Senior Member
Posts: 10008
Posted on: 01/24/2017 10:11 PM
It baffles me how good Hawaii is performing. That 390X is a beast.
It baffles me how good Hawaii is performing. That 390X is a beast.
Memorian
Senior Member
Posts: 2759
Senior Member
Posts: 2759
Posted on: 01/24/2017 10:37 PM
Something's happening, a bug or something. The game has nVIDIA features so it should perform at least a bit better on NV HW.
Something's happening, a bug or something. The game has nVIDIA features so it should perform at least a bit better on NV HW.
Corbus
Senior Member
Posts: 2264
Senior Member
Posts: 2264
Posted on: 01/25/2017 12:12 AM
I have other games running over 100 fps , when will they release a hotfix driver for those games to lower performance? I can't stand high frames
I have other games running over 100 fps , when will they release a hotfix driver for those games to lower performance? I can't stand high frames
siriq
Senior Member
Posts: 765
Senior Member
Posts: 765
Posted on: 01/25/2017 12:29 AM
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
Hilbert, turn off shadow cache and do a benchmark with and without it. You will see the difference. Actually, you have done it with on so only off version has to be done
Yeah it's crazy, the results are all over the place. I decided to leave the content as-is but did update the GeForce results towards today's 378.49 driver, and in a week or so once we have seen some game patches, driver updates etc we'll re-do the test results.
Overall though on most graphics cards the game is very enjoyable, looks good (mostly) and is very playable.
Hilbert, turn off shadow cache and do a benchmark with and without it. You will see the difference. Actually, you have done it with on so only off version has to be done
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34200
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34200
Posted on: 01/25/2017 06:42 AM
Update: added FCAT frametime results
Update: added FCAT frametime results
Darren Hodgson
Senior Member
Posts: 15635
Senior Member
Posts: 15635
Posted on: 01/25/2017 09:01 AM
What?!?!? The Radeon R9 390X is faster than the GTX 1080 at 2560x1440?
What?!?!? The Radeon R9 390X is faster than the GTX 1080 at 2560x1440?
Spets
Senior Member
Posts: 2969
Senior Member
Posts: 2969
Posted on: 01/25/2017 09:24 AM
What?!?!? The Radeon R9 390X is faster than the GTX 1080 at 2560x1440?
Did someone saw this?
A guy at Nvidia forums posted about a huge performance drop at RE7 with this new driver comparing with the latest one, is it real? Someone tested?
Old Guru3D benchmarks using 376.33: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/185647255028629505/273481000510554112/unknown.png
New Guru3D benchmarks using 378.49:
http://i.imgur.com/sl0TOfB.png
New "game ready" driver broke RE7 performance.
What?!?!? The Radeon R9 390X is faster than the GTX 1080 at 2560x1440?
Did someone saw this?
A guy at Nvidia forums posted about a huge performance drop at RE7 with this new driver comparing with the latest one, is it real? Someone tested?
Old Guru3D benchmarks using 376.33: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/185647255028629505/273481000510554112/unknown.png
New Guru3D benchmarks using 378.49:
http://i.imgur.com/sl0TOfB.png
New "game ready" driver broke RE7 performance.
Szaby59
Member
Posts: 83
Member
Posts: 83
Posted on: 01/25/2017 10:14 AM
Can you check the 970 or 980 or RX 470 4 GB frametimes ? Either the game is unplayable with 4 GB VRAM or the R9 Fury has it's own issues.
Update: added FCAT frametime results
Can you check the 970 or 980 or RX 470 4 GB frametimes ? Either the game is unplayable with 4 GB VRAM or the R9 Fury has it's own issues.
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 794
Senior Member
Posts: 794
Posted on: 01/25/2017 10:15 AM
Driver 376.60 give me much better performance i think. Or have the game better graphics with 378.49?
Driver 376.60 give me much better performance i think. Or have the game better graphics with 378.49?
Stormyandcold
Senior Member
Posts: 5116
Senior Member
Posts: 5116
Posted on: 01/25/2017 10:51 AM
Looks like a mess for benchmarking. Too unstable to draw any meaningful conclusions.
Looks like a mess for benchmarking. Too unstable to draw any meaningful conclusions.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10008
Senior Member
Posts: 10008
Posted on: 01/25/2017 11:59 AM
How can a game ready driver broke the performance? HH said performance is all over the place and it could differ from benchmark to benchmark.
New "game ready" driver broke RE7 performance.
How can a game ready driver broke the performance? HH said performance is all over the place and it could differ from benchmark to benchmark.
Quixz
Senior Member
Posts: 1310
Senior Member
Posts: 1310
Posted on: 01/25/2017 12:04 PM
The 390X is a beast!
The 390X is a beast!
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 15888
Senior Member
Posts: 15888
Posted on: 01/25/2017 12:20 PM
If you saw original benchmark with 376.60, then you would know 378.xx breaks it hard.
http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=5384652&postcount=26
pcgameshw did a review too, although it doesn't look so out of control there, they used same new r378.xx driver
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Resident-Evil-7-Biohazard-Spiel-57353/Specials/Benchmark-PC-Anforderungen-1219005/
How can a game ready driver broke the performance? HH said performance is all over the place and it could differ from benchmark to benchmark.
If you saw original benchmark with 376.60, then you would know 378.xx breaks it hard.
http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=5384652&postcount=26
pcgameshw did a review too, although it doesn't look so out of control there, they used same new r378.xx driver
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Resident-Evil-7-Biohazard-Spiel-57353/Specials/Benchmark-PC-Anforderungen-1219005/
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 794
Senior Member
Posts: 794
Posted on: 01/25/2017 12:31 PM
Maybe Guru3d test with Shadow cashe on?
Maybe Guru3d test with Shadow cashe on?
pages 1 2 3
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 152
How is the 970 faster than the 980? What the ...? lul