G.Skill TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 7200 CL34 2x16 GB review
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
Resident Evil 3: PC graphics performance benchmark review





We take a look at Resident Evil 3 (2020 Remake) in our usual in-depth ways. That would be tested on the PC gaming wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
« Palit GeForce GTX 1650 KalmX review · Resident Evil 3: PC graphics performance benchmark review
· ASUS STRIX GeForce GTX 1650 Super review »
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 3373
Senior Member
Posts: 3373
Posted on: 03/30/2020 05:26 PM
How do you even code the engine so that added cores lower the performance? Shouldn't the game just use a limited number of cores but perform just as well? It wasn't even a question of SMT. Unless it's somehow related to the turbo clocks and stressing multiple cores for no reason whatsoever, so that with more cores active and at 100%, they obviously can't clock so high. It would be historically bad programming. Years ago there was a game that artificially stressed cores so much that the game itself ended up suffering. I just don't remember which game it was. It was patched, fortunately.
How do you even code the engine so that added cores lower the performance? Shouldn't the game just use a limited number of cores but perform just as well? It wasn't even a question of SMT. Unless it's somehow related to the turbo clocks and stressing multiple cores for no reason whatsoever, so that with more cores active and at 100%, they obviously can't clock so high. It would be historically bad programming. Years ago there was a game that artificially stressed cores so much that the game itself ended up suffering. I just don't remember which game it was. It was patched, fortunately.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 21267
Senior Member
Posts: 21267
Posted on: 03/30/2020 05:27 PM
Nice performance all around. 6gb vram usage at 1080p become a norm.
Nice performance all around. 6gb vram usage at 1080p become a norm.
vestibule
Senior Member
Posts: 1281
Senior Member
Posts: 1281
Posted on: 03/30/2020 05:59 PM
Nice review, I liked the CPU utilisation. Something for me to look into when I'm playing. Hmmm
Nice review, I liked the CPU utilisation. Something for me to look into when I'm playing. Hmmm

Kool64
Senior Member
Posts: 1483
Senior Member
Posts: 1483
Posted on: 03/30/2020 07:09 PM
at 1080 and 4k changing graphics settings makes little to no difference. That's interesting
at 1080 and 4k changing graphics settings makes little to no difference. That's interesting
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 17865
Yeah it ran great, even on oldies 980ti OC'ed.
I maxed it out, except vram 6gb (just in case) and I could play DSR'd 2880x1620 fine (above 60fps all the time), actually it was very similar performance to RE2 remake or RE7.