Radeon RX 6500 XT review
MSI Vigor GK71 Sonic keyboard review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Suprim X 12GB review
TeamGroup A440 PRO Special 5eries 4TB NVMe review
Core i5 12400 processor review
MSI MAG B660M Mortar WIFI review
Biostar Z690 Valkyrie review
TeamGroup A440 PRO PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
DDR5 scaling with G.Skill TridentZ5 6000 CL36 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3070 Noctua OC review
Resident Evil 3: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 03/30/2020 05:00 PM [
35 comment(s) ]
We take a look at Resident Evil 3 (2020 Remake) in our usual in-depth ways. That would be tested on the PC gaming wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 2735
Senior Member
Posts: 2735
Posted on: 03/30/2020 05:26 PM
How do you even code the engine so that added cores lower the performance? Shouldn't the game just use a limited number of cores but perform just as well? It wasn't even a question of SMT. Unless it's somehow related to the turbo clocks and stressing multiple cores for no reason whatsoever, so that with more cores active and at 100%, they obviously can't clock so high. It would be historically bad programming. Years ago there was a game that artificially stressed cores so much that the game itself ended up suffering. I just don't remember which game it was. It was patched, fortunately.
How do you even code the engine so that added cores lower the performance? Shouldn't the game just use a limited number of cores but perform just as well? It wasn't even a question of SMT. Unless it's somehow related to the turbo clocks and stressing multiple cores for no reason whatsoever, so that with more cores active and at 100%, they obviously can't clock so high. It would be historically bad programming. Years ago there was a game that artificially stressed cores so much that the game itself ended up suffering. I just don't remember which game it was. It was patched, fortunately.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 17237
Senior Member
Posts: 17237
Posted on: 03/30/2020 05:27 PM
Nice performance all around. 6gb vram usage at 1080p become a norm.
Nice performance all around. 6gb vram usage at 1080p become a norm.
vestibule
Senior Member
Posts: 593
Senior Member
Posts: 593
Posted on: 03/30/2020 05:59 PM
Nice review, I liked the CPU utilisation. Something for me to look into when I'm playing. Hmmm
Nice review, I liked the CPU utilisation. Something for me to look into when I'm playing. Hmmm
Kool64
Senior Member
Posts: 1149
Senior Member
Posts: 1149
Posted on: 03/30/2020 07:09 PM
at 1080 and 4k changing graphics settings makes little to no difference. That's interesting
at 1080 and 4k changing graphics settings makes little to no difference. That's interesting
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 17306
Yeah it ran great, even on oldies 980ti OC'ed.
I maxed it out, except vram 6gb (just in case) and I could play DSR'd 2880x1620 fine (above 60fps all the time), actually it was very similar performance to RE2 remake or RE7.