Fractal Design Torrent Black RGB TG review
Core i9 12900K DDR4 3600 vs DDR5 5200 performance review
Corsair H150i Elite LCD review
Seasonic Syncro Q704 chassis + Connect PSU review
Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 860W PSU Review
Crucial P5 Plus PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Fractal Design Lumen S28 RGB review (LCS)
WD Red SN500 NVMe SSD review
Core i9 12900K processor review
Core i5 12600K processor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
Posted by: on: 09/01/2021 11:50 AM [
12 comment(s) ]
Every now and then a manufacturer manages to surprise us with something really good. And here we are, meet the new M10P from Plextor. This round it does not have a Phison PS5018-E18 controller, and as it turns out, that brings in tremendously good results closing in on 7 GB/sec.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3
H83
Senior Member
Posts: 3627
Senior Member
Posts: 3627
Posted on: 09/05/2021 12:54 PM
Out of curiosity, which games?
As that's generally one of the metrics that sees little to no difference between SATA and NVME drives so I'm interested to see if it's something I can test myself. Also worth keeping in mind there might be unrelated reasons as well, a mostly full disk can't do proper garbage collection and tends to perform worse for example.
I´ve only tried a few games because i did a fresh install.
Speaking of those games, Path of Exile loads are almost instant, with the Samsung 970 evo they would take 15 to 30 seconds. Doom takes between 15 to 25 seconds to load, before it would take between 30 to 60 seconds. Cyberpunk loads in 10/20 seconds, something i consider amazing considering we are talking about an huge open world.
I still have to try more games but the improvements are significant so far in this aspect.
But to be interily fair, i have to say i did a fresh Windows install and i move from W7 to W10 but i doubt Windows "responsability" in the improvement of loading times because of all the crap running in the background. In W7 i would have around 75 active processes running, in W10 i have around 145 processes...
I would love to know what all those processes are doing...
Out of curiosity, which games?
As that's generally one of the metrics that sees little to no difference between SATA and NVME drives so I'm interested to see if it's something I can test myself. Also worth keeping in mind there might be unrelated reasons as well, a mostly full disk can't do proper garbage collection and tends to perform worse for example.
I´ve only tried a few games because i did a fresh install.
Speaking of those games, Path of Exile loads are almost instant, with the Samsung 970 evo they would take 15 to 30 seconds. Doom takes between 15 to 25 seconds to load, before it would take between 30 to 60 seconds. Cyberpunk loads in 10/20 seconds, something i consider amazing considering we are talking about an huge open world.
I still have to try more games but the improvements are significant so far in this aspect.
But to be interily fair, i have to say i did a fresh Windows install and i move from W7 to W10 but i doubt Windows "responsability" in the improvement of loading times because of all the crap running in the background. In W7 i would have around 75 active processes running, in W10 i have around 145 processes...
I would love to know what all those processes are doing...
pages 1 2 3
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2047
Out of curiosity, which games?
As that's generally one of the metrics that sees little to no difference between SATA and NVME drives so I'm interested to see if it's something I can test myself. Also worth keeping in mind there might be unrelated reasons as well, a mostly full disk can't do proper garbage collection and tends to perform worse for example.