Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Palit GeForce GTX 1660 StormX OC review
We review a GeForce GTX 1660 that is priced spot on 219 USD, the MSRP of the new non-Ti model, meet the petite Palit GeForce RTX 1660 StormX OC edition. Based on a big single fan and a small form factor you should not be fooled by its looks. It performs well on all fronts, including cooling acoustic levels.
Read article
Advertisement
« MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming X review · Palit GeForce GTX 1660 StormX OC review
· MSI GeForce GTX 1660 VENTUS XS 6G OC review »
pages « < 12 13 14 15
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 20776
Senior Member
Posts: 20776
Posted on: 03/18/2019 05:46 PM
Texture setting is a luxury. Textures does not effect the framerate at all. Its either you have enough vram or you dont.
580 8gb can max out Apex Legends and 1660 6gb cant (insane texture setting) its simple as that.
@airbud7 yeah ok looks like i7 6850k is the fastest cpu right now.
Texture setting is a luxury. Textures does not effect the framerate at all. Its either you have enough vram or you dont.
580 8gb can max out Apex Legends and 1660 6gb cant (insane texture setting) its simple as that.
@airbud7 yeah ok looks like i7 6850k is the fastest cpu right now.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8362
Senior Member
Posts: 8362
Posted on: 03/18/2019 07:17 PM
Texture setting is a luxury. Textures does not effect the framerate at all. Its either you have enough vram or you dont.
580 8gb can max out Apex Legends and 1660 6gb cant (insane texture setting) its simple as that.
@airbud7 yeah ok looks like i7 6850k is the fastest cpu right now.
1660 ti, with 6GB of ram, gets better performance then the 580 and 590 in apex legends, maxed out, you're so-called theory that the RX 580 8GB is what allows the RX 580 to max it out over a 1660 is moot point at that point, since obviously, if the ti, with the same 6GB of ram, can out perform both the 580 8gb and 590 in apex, the mythical bottleneck you propose is non-existent.
In fact i can barely find any review websites that have tested the 1660 non-ti on apex legends, only one i can find is gamers nexus, which proves you wrong on their review

Now i'll grant you that says high, you said insane, i have not played apex legends so i can't say weather or not high is the highest, or if insane is an actual setting you do can, but point being, there are no reviews that have tested this, and yet you're coming out here claiming as though something is factual, when it's not.
Since you like youtubers so much

But again, it is tested with everything on high, i do see where it states: "Texture Streaming Budget" and that's not set to the highest. I have seen a few youtube channels set it to the highest (insane) and there does not seem to be a difference, that being said, that's not 100% accurate i'm certain since every youtuber i have found so far shows gameplay and fps but does not do a comparison to any other graphics cards.
So where is your mythical deduction about apex legends?
Seems to do "insane", just fine, something you literally, said it "can't"
580 8gb can max out Apex Legends and 1660 6gb cant (insane texture setting) its simple as that.
Texture setting is a luxury. Textures does not effect the framerate at all. Its either you have enough vram or you dont.
580 8gb can max out Apex Legends and 1660 6gb cant (insane texture setting) its simple as that.
@airbud7 yeah ok looks like i7 6850k is the fastest cpu right now.
1660 ti, with 6GB of ram, gets better performance then the 580 and 590 in apex legends, maxed out, you're so-called theory that the RX 580 8GB is what allows the RX 580 to max it out over a 1660 is moot point at that point, since obviously, if the ti, with the same 6GB of ram, can out perform both the 580 8gb and 590 in apex, the mythical bottleneck you propose is non-existent.
In fact i can barely find any review websites that have tested the 1660 non-ti on apex legends, only one i can find is gamers nexus, which proves you wrong on their review

Now i'll grant you that says high, you said insane, i have not played apex legends so i can't say weather or not high is the highest, or if insane is an actual setting you do can, but point being, there are no reviews that have tested this, and yet you're coming out here claiming as though something is factual, when it's not.
Since you like youtubers so much

But again, it is tested with everything on high, i do see where it states: "Texture Streaming Budget" and that's not set to the highest. I have seen a few youtube channels set it to the highest (insane) and there does not seem to be a difference, that being said, that's not 100% accurate i'm certain since every youtuber i have found so far shows gameplay and fps but does not do a comparison to any other graphics cards.
So where is your mythical deduction about apex legends?
Seems to do "insane", just fine, something you literally, said it "can't"
580 8gb can max out Apex Legends and 1660 6gb cant (insane texture setting) its simple as that.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 8362
Senior Member
Posts: 8362
Posted on: 03/18/2019 10:41 PM
@Undying do you like liking someones post when they call you out and you have nothing to back up your claims? 2nd time you've done this, in this thread alone. Or is it an admit you're wrong like?
If you have something to back up your posts, do it, otherwise i don't understand why you continue to make such outlandish statements with nothing to back it up unless you like to troll, which it seems you do, if you can't back anything up.
You're reminding me of warlord more and more every day, are you two one and the same?
@Undying do you like liking someones post when they call you out and you have nothing to back up your claims? 2nd time you've done this, in this thread alone. Or is it an admit you're wrong like?
If you have something to back up your posts, do it, otherwise i don't understand why you continue to make such outlandish statements with nothing to back it up unless you like to troll, which it seems you do, if you can't back anything up.
You're reminding me of warlord more and more every day, are you two one and the same?
warlord
Senior Member
Posts: 2760
Senior Member
Posts: 2760
Posted on: 03/18/2019 11:04 PM
@Aura89 Undying is an AMD fan more than I would ever be. He loves his 580 I hate my 390X, no comparison. Lol.
Anyway less vram amount equals bigger performance drop in bigger resolutions in comparison with lower ones only if the amount is the limiter. Raw power overwhelms capacity. That's a well known law.
Useless ram and vram will never offer extra performance. And if any game allows you to play without crashing, then the vram and ram amount is irrelevant.
So, if any game is playable or any app is working with 6gb gtx16 series, it would perform the same even if it had 2 extra gigabytes. If the performance is underwhelming is due to architecture itself.
@Aura89 Undying is an AMD fan more than I would ever be. He loves his 580 I hate my 390X, no comparison. Lol.
Anyway less vram amount equals bigger performance drop in bigger resolutions in comparison with lower ones only if the amount is the limiter. Raw power overwhelms capacity. That's a well known law.
Useless ram and vram will never offer extra performance. And if any game allows you to play without crashing, then the vram and ram amount is irrelevant.
So, if any game is playable or any app is working with 6gb gtx16 series, it would perform the same even if it had 2 extra gigabytes. If the performance is underwhelming is due to architecture itself.
pages « < 12 13 14 15
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
But, but, but MuLTi-GPu!.!.!!