Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Corsair Void RGB Elite Wireless Headset review
Team Group PD400 Portable SSD review
AMD Athlon 3000G review
Team Group T-Force Delta Max 1 TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - November 2019
ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore review
Toshiba RC500 500GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Promo: URcdkey Black Friday Windows 10 Pro for $12
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) Review
Posted by: on: 08/04/2016 08:10 PM [
276 comment(s) ]
In this article we'll look at something that rises like the Phoenix, the new generation Nvidia Titan X based on that all new Pascal GPU. Armed with 12GB of GDDR5X graphics memory and that all new GP102 GPU, we are certain we're gonna break some records today.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
nvidia,
geforce titan x
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
FranciscoCL
Senior Member
Posts: 204
Senior Member
Posts: 204
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:27 PM
Reading (37 pages!, thanks for the hard work)...
One thing about the name of this card: I think it is just "nVidia Titan X", without the "GeForce GTX".
---
Edit1:
Results for The Witcher 3 @ 1080 are repeated instead of 1440.
---
Edit2:
About the name, just read that you mention that at the end (conclusion).
---
Edit3:
Any chance to see the power comsumption while overclocked?
Reading (37 pages!, thanks for the hard work)...
One thing about the name of this card: I think it is just "nVidia Titan X", without the "GeForce GTX".
---
Edit1:
Results for The Witcher 3 @ 1080 are repeated instead of 1440.
---
Edit2:
About the name, just read that you mention that at the end (conclusion).
---
Edit3:
Any chance to see the power comsumption while overclocked?
dante`afk
Member
Posts: 20
Member
Posts: 20
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:31 PM
thanks.
what about 1080 sli vs titan xp?
still considering if I should keep my sli or switch to txp. got all 3 cards here.
thanks.
what about 1080 sli vs titan xp?
still considering if I should keep my sli or switch to txp. got all 3 cards here.
bigfutus
Senior Member
Posts: 523
Senior Member
Posts: 523
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:45 PM
Thanks for the review, it's really refreshing to see those fat juicy numbers, after depressing results from 2014. Even if the card is silly.
Thanks for the review, it's really refreshing to see those fat juicy numbers, after depressing results from 2014. Even if the card is silly.
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 6657
Senior Member
Posts: 6657
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:48 PM
need correction.
page 1:
locked in at 2,500 MHz which is 8 GHz
page 3:
In Ultra HD it can advance up-to 25 to 40% in performance over the GeForce GTX 980 Ti as we learned.
The card has a 180 Watt TDP
page 36:
Memory Clock : +550 MHz (=9.45 GHz effective data-rate)
need correction.
page 1:
locked in at 2,500 MHz which is 8 GHz
page 3:
In Ultra HD it can advance up-to 25 to 40% in performance over the GeForce GTX 980 Ti as we learned.
The card has a 180 Watt TDP
page 36:
Memory Clock : +550 MHz (=9.45 GHz effective data-rate)
Spets
Senior Member
Posts: 2986
Senior Member
Posts: 2986
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:49 PM
Thanks for the review, that card's a beast
4k scores looking good.
Thanks for the review, that card's a beast
4k scores looking good.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36458
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36458
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:54 PM
Cheers guys, I am still editing and sifting out some small things.
Cheers guys, I am still editing and sifting out some small things.
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 6657
Senior Member
Posts: 6657
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:55 PM
Thanks for the review, that card's a beast
4k scores looking good.
finally the card that does 60fps 4k.
even if just a tad of oc is needed on few occasions
Thanks for the review, that card's a beast
4k scores looking good.
finally the card that does 60fps 4k.
even if just a tad of oc is needed on few occasions
Corbus
Senior Member
Posts: 2354
Senior Member
Posts: 2354
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:55 PM
Lots of space between it and the 1080,too bad i don't have that kind of money to throw at a gpu. This card is begging to be watercooled though.
Lots of space between it and the 1080,too bad i don't have that kind of money to throw at a gpu. This card is begging to be watercooled though.
Whiplashwang
Senior Member
Posts: 2290
Senior Member
Posts: 2290
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:56 PM
I was hoping for higher FPS in comparison to the GTX1080 considering the asking price for the Titan X... but I guess this is what happens when there is no competition from AMD allowing Nvidia to charge kidneys and eyes. Anyways, nice review Hilbert!
I was hoping for higher FPS in comparison to the GTX1080 considering the asking price for the Titan X... but I guess this is what happens when there is no competition from AMD allowing Nvidia to charge kidneys and eyes. Anyways, nice review Hilbert!
EngEd
Member
Posts: 31
Member
Posts: 31
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:57 PM
Hey Gilbert, you should do 1080 SLI vs titan X (pascal)
So whats recommended? Get the titan x or two 1080 for 1440p and 4k?
Personally I think 1080 SLI is better at that price range, considering there is aftermarked coolers.
Hey Gilbert, you should do 1080 SLI vs titan X (pascal)
So whats recommended? Get the titan x or two 1080 for 1440p and 4k?
Personally I think 1080 SLI is better at that price range, considering there is aftermarked coolers.
Slikar
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Posted on: 08/04/2016 08:59 PM
4k on a single gpu with reasonable framerate is finally a reality. It's actually a complete overkill for 1440p, lol
4k on a single gpu with reasonable framerate is finally a reality. It's actually a complete overkill for 1440p, lol
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36458
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36458
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:02 PM
I might look into 1080 SLI another time as I do need to update that preliminary article anyway, please understand that this Titan X arrived like this morning and it is my 5th review this frickin week. I am exhausted.
I might look into 1080 SLI another time as I do need to update that preliminary article anyway, please understand that this Titan X arrived like this morning and it is my 5th review this frickin week. I am exhausted.
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 6657
Senior Member
Posts: 6657
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:05 PM
weekend soon.
turn your mobile off and your good
I might look into 1080 SLI another time as I do need to update that preliminary article anyway, please understand that this Titan X arrived like this morning and it is my 5th review this frickin week. I am exhausted.
weekend soon.
turn your mobile off and your good
RavenMaster
Senior Member
Posts: 1075
Senior Member
Posts: 1075
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:05 PM
Great job Hilbert
I might look into 1080 SLI another time as I do need to update that preliminary article anyway, please understand that this Titan X arrived like this morning and it is my 5th review this frickin week. I am exhausted.
Great job Hilbert
Barry J
Senior Member
Posts: 2769
Senior Member
Posts: 2769
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:06 PM
Thanks Hilbert
Awesome work as usual
Thanks Hilbert
Awesome work as usual
pharma
Senior Member
Posts: 1107
Senior Member
Posts: 1107
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:24 PM
One thing about the name of this card: I think it is just "nVidia Titan X", without the "GeForce GTX"
'Titan XP'
One thing about the name of this card: I think it is just "nVidia Titan X", without the "GeForce GTX"
Han2K
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:28 PM
Since Volta is sheduled for 2108 i guess 1080Ti will be released next year to fill the gap between 1080 and TitanX.
Since Volta is sheduled for 2108 i guess 1080Ti will be released next year to fill the gap between 1080 and TitanX.
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9743
Senior Member
Posts: 9743
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:38 PM
I might be alone on this but I dont see the price as worth it for 30 more fps or 15 on low end over 1080gtx, maybe ijust looking at wrong parts of the reviews
I might be alone on this but I dont see the price as worth it for 30 more fps or 15 on low end over 1080gtx, maybe ijust looking at wrong parts of the reviews
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 1009
Senior Member
Posts: 1009
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:40 PM
Yea...
I hope AMD continues to refrain from releasing $1200 3d cards that "really aren't about 3d gaming but about 'deep learning' and 'pro-suming'"--and yet nonetheless somehow wind-up featured *exclusively* in reviews just like this one that are nothing *but* 3d-gaming reviews revolving around frame-rate charts... (Sorry, but the only "deep learning" I see in this review is the knowledge of how foolish I'd be to consider buying something like this--and 'pro-suming'?--Didn't see anything about that, whatever it is... )
"Competition" in the $1200 single 3d-card market must these days cover a base market of at least three or four people, eh? And on that subject, I didn't see much from the usual suspects about how crummy a mere 60 fps is @ 1200P--only a comment or two about how grand 60 fps is @ 4k--more or less--and for only $1200, too...! Gosh..60 fps, for only $1200...! It's a miracle...
I'm sorry if I sound less than enthused, but if there is anything more to this "product" than sheer empty marketing propaganda for the green team I'd love to know what that might be.
I was hoping for higher FPS in comparison to the GTX1080 considering the asking price for the Titan X... but I guess this is what happens when there is no competition from AMD allowing Nvidia to charge kidneys and eyes. Anyways, nice review Hilbert!
Yea...
I hope AMD continues to refrain from releasing $1200 3d cards that "really aren't about 3d gaming but about 'deep learning' and 'pro-suming'"--and yet nonetheless somehow wind-up featured *exclusively* in reviews just like this one that are nothing *but* 3d-gaming reviews revolving around frame-rate charts... (Sorry, but the only "deep learning" I see in this review is the knowledge of how foolish I'd be to consider buying something like this--and 'pro-suming'?--Didn't see anything about that, whatever it is... )
"Competition" in the $1200 single 3d-card market must these days cover a base market of at least three or four people, eh? And on that subject, I didn't see much from the usual suspects about how crummy a mere 60 fps is @ 1200P--only a comment or two about how grand 60 fps is @ 4k--more or less--and for only $1200, too...! Gosh..60 fps, for only $1200...! It's a miracle...
I'm sorry if I sound less than enthused, but if there is anything more to this "product" than sheer empty marketing propaganda for the green team I'd love to know what that might be.
Asgardi
Senior Member
Posts: 229
Senior Member
Posts: 229
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:40 PM
Well with this kind of product line they kind of deserve that.
I was hoping for higher FPS in comparison to the GTX1080 considering the asking price for the Titan X... but I guess this is what happens when there is no competition from AMD allowing Nvidia to charge kidneys and eyes. Anyways, nice review Hilbert!
Well with this kind of product line they kind of deserve that.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36458
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36458
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:42 PM
You're not alone in that, the money is not worth the extra FPS. As a gamer your money is better spend on say a 1060/1070 or RX 480.
But it's an X-factor product, for the guys that build a Core i7 6950 with 64 GB memory and NVME SSDs, this product can and probably will make sense. The are in demand and as such that warrants it being marketed and sold. There's no shame in that or refusing to spend money on this. Other build and customize performance cars and spends thousands. Same thing, different category.
I might be alone on this but I dont see the price as worth it for 30 more fps or 15 on low end over 1080gtx, maybe ijust looking at wrong parts of the reviews
You're not alone in that, the money is not worth the extra FPS. As a gamer your money is better spend on say a 1060/1070 or RX 480.
But it's an X-factor product, for the guys that build a Core i7 6950 with 64 GB memory and NVME SSDs, this product can and probably will make sense. The are in demand and as such that warrants it being marketed and sold. There's no shame in that or refusing to spend money on this. Other build and customize performance cars and spends thousands. Same thing, different category.
buhehe
Senior Member
Posts: 193
Senior Member
Posts: 193
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:47 PM
It's the card that often pushes the framerate much closer to 60 - from 1080's mid 40s to the high 50s, so it makes sense for those who want a smooth 4k experience without messing with SLI.
While the price/perf is horrible, even more so than 1080, some people just have the money to spend. 1200$ isn't a *huge* amount of money all things considered.
I might be alone on this but I dont see the price as worth it for 30 more fps or 15 on low end over 1080gtx, maybe ijust looking at wrong parts of the reviews
It's the card that often pushes the framerate much closer to 60 - from 1080's mid 40s to the high 50s, so it makes sense for those who want a smooth 4k experience without messing with SLI.
While the price/perf is horrible, even more so than 1080, some people just have the money to spend. 1200$ isn't a *huge* amount of money all things considered.
anxious_f0x
Senior Member
Posts: 1558
Senior Member
Posts: 1558
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:48 PM
Thanks for the hard work you put in Hilbert, another great review and another crazy Titan X.
Thanks for the hard work you put in Hilbert, another great review and another crazy Titan X.
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9743
Senior Member
Posts: 9743
Posted on: 08/04/2016 09:53 PM
You're not alone in that, the money is not worth the extra FPS. As a gamer your money is better spend on say a 1060/1070 or RX 480.
But it's an X-factor product, for the guys that build a Core i7 6950 with 64 GB memory and NVME SSDs, this product can and probably will make sense. The are in demand and as such that warrants it being marketed and sold. There's no shame in that or refusing to spend money on this. Other build and customize performance cars and spends thousands. Same thing, different category.
just say it for the people that have money to burn. i know such person they got sli titans just cause they had money to burn and they dont play any game that would even need that kind power. they just want to say they have it. I wish i had money to burn like those people
You're not alone in that, the money is not worth the extra FPS. As a gamer your money is better spend on say a 1060/1070 or RX 480.
But it's an X-factor product, for the guys that build a Core i7 6950 with 64 GB memory and NVME SSDs, this product can and probably will make sense. The are in demand and as such that warrants it being marketed and sold. There's no shame in that or refusing to spend money on this. Other build and customize performance cars and spends thousands. Same thing, different category.
just say it for the people that have money to burn. i know such person they got sli titans just cause they had money to burn and they dont play any game that would even need that kind power. they just want to say they have it. I wish i had money to burn like those people
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11360
First!.
Thanks for the review, appreciate your work