Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
ASUS ROG Thor 1000W Platinum II (1000W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming X 8GB review





For our 3rd Radeon RX 5500 XT review we peek at an offering from MSI, this 8GB version is, you guessed it already, the most silent card we have had our hands-on. Not just that's he's quite a looker as well.
Read article
Advertisement
« Guru3D Winter 2019 PC Buyer Guide · MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming X 8GB review
· Gigabyte Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming 8GB review »
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Posted on: 12/12/2019 04:27 PM
Cmon, not all gaming on 4K with heavy mods (and this card is best for HD reso). There youtube reviews comparing 2GB with 4GB and there no difference in most benches.
The 4GB version should not exist.
Cmon, not all gaming on 4K with heavy mods (and this card is best for HD reso). There youtube reviews comparing 2GB with 4GB and there no difference in most benches.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 18835
Senior Member
Posts: 18835
Posted on: 12/12/2019 04:32 PM
I though this card competes with 1650S but its fast as 1660 and rx590. Im surprised.
I though this card competes with 1650S but its fast as 1660 and rx590. Im surprised.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
Posted on: 12/12/2019 04:33 PM
Look at this review. The 4GB version is 5-22 FPS slower in 1080p games.
And the vulcan results in RDR2 are horrible. Looks like AMD has some work to do.
Cmon, not all gaming on 4K with heavy mods (and this card is best for HD reso). There youtube reviews comparing 2GB with 4GB and there no difference in most benches.
Look at this review. The 4GB version is 5-22 FPS slower in 1080p games.
And the vulcan results in RDR2 are horrible. Looks like AMD has some work to do.
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Senior Member
Posts: 6073
Posted on: 12/12/2019 04:34 PM
Look at this review. The 4GB version is 5-22 FPS slower in 1080p games.
And the vulcan results in RDR2 are horrible. Looks like AMD has some work to do.
Guess I have to catch up with times. but damn, Gears of Wars just punishes low memory!
Look at this review. The 4GB version is 5-22 FPS slower in 1080p games.
And the vulcan results in RDR2 are horrible. Looks like AMD has some work to do.
Guess I have to catch up with times. but damn, Gears of Wars just punishes low memory!
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
The 4GB version should not exist.