Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review

New Downloads
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.1a Download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.5.2 WHQL download
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4382
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v5.2
GeForce 535.98 WHQL driver download
CPU-Z download v2.06
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.5.1 WHQL download
GeForce 532.03 WHQL driver download
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.05.16.529
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.4


New Forum Topics
PSA: 535 system stability concerns. AMD's Future Developments: Ryzen 8000 and Navi 3.5 Intel Introduces Breakthrough Power Delivery Technique for Next-Generation Processors - PowerVia Third party Graphics Card hardware database Extreme 4-Way Sli Tuning Nvidia Driver & COD MW2 NVIDIA GeForce Hotfix Driver 536.09 Researchers Expose Vulnerabilities in AMD's Firmware-Based TPMs Seby9123 Emerges as OC Champion in G.SKILL OC World Cup 2023 AMD EPYC 7002 Server Processors Reportedly Harbour a Bug - Crashes After 1044 Days of Uptime




Guru3D.com » Review » MSI GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GAMING X review 5

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GAMING X review 5

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/22/2019 07:29 PM [ 12 comment(s) ]

MSI released their GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GAMING X, a product with a more than capable cooler as well being factory tweaked. The SUPER edition card comes with 12 Gbps GDDR6 graphics memory, however, has only got 4GB of it.

Read article


Advertisement



Tagged as: msi

« AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X review · MSI GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GAMING X review · Gigabyte TRX40 Aorus Xtreme review »

pages 1 2 3

buhehe
Senior Member



Posts: 283
Posted on: 11/22/2019 07:43 PM
Nvidia's product roster is such a mess. Bad Nvidia, stop it.

Loophole35
Senior Member



Posts: 9797
Posted on: 11/22/2019 07:52 PM
Nvidia's product roster is such a mess. Bad Nvidia, stop it.

Just forget the non-super exists. The super cards are what the standard ones should have been. this card is $10 more than the regular 1650 and is ~20% faster.

If anything I applaud Nvidia for the super line-up due to the much better $/performance over the standard Turning line-up. Guess they didn't want to just sit there and watch the sales figures continue to stagnate.

buhehe
Senior Member



Posts: 283
Posted on: 11/22/2019 09:05 PM
Just forget the non-super exists. The super cards are what the standard ones should have been. this card is $10 more than the regular 1650 and is ~20% faster.

If anything I applaud Nvidia for the super line-up due to the much better $/performance over the standard Turning line-up. Guess they didn't want to just sit there and watch the sales figures continue to stagnate.

The products themselves are not bad... but boy this line is confusing.

1xxx products being released after 2xxx went out
Ti and Super are redundant - they both mean "kinda better"
Super cards being released with performance identical to existing products (see 1660 Ti and 1660 Super)

IMHO they should have stuck to the same generation - not borrowing numbers from the previous one.
Especially the midrange is confusing - where you transition from 1660 Ti (or, well... Super) to 2060.

Sure, the big difference between gen 10 / 16 and 20 is RTX. Might as well just say "GTX 2050, RTX 2060".
Besides, who is ever going to use RTX on a 2060? But that's another matter.

Between gen 16 and 20 there are currently 12 concurrent models, some of which are slowly being replaced by the Super versions but are still around.

Kool64
Senior Member



Posts: 1516
Posted on: 11/22/2019 11:25 PM
Ok so if this lands in the 150-160$ range that’s actually pretty impressive considering how close it is to the 1660 or the last get 1070.

Loophole35
Senior Member



Posts: 9797
Posted on: 11/23/2019 01:11 AM
Building a 1080p rig with less than $550 is really easy now and you can do it with a clear upgrade path. I totally expect the 5500/xt to be around this same price/performance area.

on the naming thing. I don’t find it confusing in the least. No 16xx card is faster than a 20xx card so no toes are stepped on there. I for one have always called my card by it’s number designation (6950, 7970, 670, 780, 1070, 1080ti see what I mean) so the knowing the 20xx cards have the RT cores and the 16xx cards don’t is easy. Now the ti/super I get the issue there but as always I implore consumers to research their purchases.

BTW who do I have to talk to at Nvidia to get the ULTRA monicker to make a comeback?

pages 1 2 3

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Guru3D.com » Articles » MSI GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GAMING X review 5

Guru3D.com © 2023