G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight​ (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 processor review
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 processor review
MSI GeForce GTX 1060 Gaming X 3GB Review
Posted by: on: 08/22/2016 01:42 PM [
21 comment(s) ]
In this article we'll review the MSI GeForce GTX 1060 Gaming X 3GB, aimed at the budget minded consumer this card is much cheaper (219 USD) compared to the 6GB versions.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 5
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
Senior Member
Posts: 9797
Posted on: 08/22/2016 01:55 PM
Okay at 1080 but yeah don't really get this card TBH. Someone will by it thinking that it is just as fast as the 6GB version and I find that disingenuous.
Okay at 1080 but yeah don't really get this card TBH. Someone will by it thinking that it is just as fast as the 6GB version and I find that disingenuous.
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 3557
Senior Member
Posts: 3557
Posted on: 08/22/2016 02:56 PM
Weird product from Nvidia. Idk who is this made for...
Nevertheless good review, HH.
for people that play small game at 1080, it's 250 Euro less than the GTX 1070 that is useless at 1080 and only 10Euro more in shop than GTX960 2g that is a bit limited for the exercise...
bang for buck
i was waiting this review to see if i take the 6g or the 3g for updating my GF computer.
THX a lot Hilbert
Weird product from Nvidia. Idk who is this made for...
Nevertheless good review, HH.
for people that play small game at 1080, it's 250 Euro less than the GTX 1070 that is useless at 1080 and only 10Euro more in shop than GTX960 2g that is a bit limited for the exercise...
bang for buck
i was waiting this review to see if i take the 6g or the 3g for updating my GF computer.
THX a lot Hilbert
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 7148
Senior Member
Posts: 7148
Posted on: 08/22/2016 03:17 PM
Just to clarify - this isn't just a 3GB VRAM difference. Stuff like CUDA cores and shader units are slightly cut back too, which explains why this GPU's performance still suffers even at 1080p resolutions. If the only spec that changed was the amount of VRAM, I suspect this GPU would perform just about equal with the 6GB model (in 1080p games). Nvidia's memory compression is pretty decent.
Just to clarify - this isn't just a 3GB VRAM difference. Stuff like CUDA cores and shader units are slightly cut back too, which explains why this GPU's performance still suffers even at 1080p resolutions. If the only spec that changed was the amount of VRAM, I suspect this GPU would perform just about equal with the 6GB model (in 1080p games). Nvidia's memory compression is pretty decent.
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11616
Senior Member
Posts: 11616
Posted on: 08/22/2016 03:56 PM
Weird product from Nvidia. Idk who is this made for...
Nevertheless good review, HH.
A+ post, very constructive.
Like amd's lineup makes any sense. 4gb/8gb 470s and 480s.
They should have made the 470 4gb and 480 8gb.
But all we see is your praise for amd and troll posts in nv sections.
3GB card is plenty for lower resolutions. Don't see how that is hard to understand
Weird product from Nvidia. Idk who is this made for...
Nevertheless good review, HH.
A+ post, very constructive.
Like amd's lineup makes any sense. 4gb/8gb 470s and 480s.
They should have made the 470 4gb and 480 8gb.
But all we see is your praise for amd and troll posts in nv sections.
3GB card is plenty for lower resolutions. Don't see how that is hard to understand
pages 1 2 3 4 5
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 20754
Weird product from Nvidia. Idk who is this made for...
Nevertheless good review, HH.