Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
G.Skill TridentZ Royal Elite DDR4 3600 MHz CL14 review
Corsair HS80 RGB Wireless Headset review
Intel Architecture day 2021: Alder Lake
Intel Architecture day 2021: Xe and XeSS
MSI GeForce GTX 1060 Gaming X 3GB Review
Posted by: on: 08/22/2016 01:42 PM [
21 comment(s) ]
In this article we'll review the MSI GeForce GTX 1060 Gaming X 3GB, aimed at the budget minded consumer this card is much cheaper (219 USD) compared to the 6GB versions.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 5
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9793
Senior Member
Posts: 9793
Posted on: 08/22/2016 01:55 PM
Okay at 1080 but yeah don't really get this card TBH. Someone will by it thinking that it is just as fast as the 6GB version and I find that disingenuous.
Okay at 1080 but yeah don't really get this card TBH. Someone will by it thinking that it is just as fast as the 6GB version and I find that disingenuous.
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 3018
Senior Member
Posts: 3018
Posted on: 08/22/2016 02:56 PM
Weird product from Nvidia. Idk who is this made for...
Nevertheless good review, HH.
for people that play small game at 1080, it's 250 Euro less than the GTX 1070 that is useless at 1080 and only 10Euro more in shop than GTX960 2g that is a bit limited for the exercise...
bang for buck
i was waiting this review to see if i take the 6g or the 3g for updating my GF computer.
THX a lot Hilbert
Weird product from Nvidia. Idk who is this made for...
Nevertheless good review, HH.
for people that play small game at 1080, it's 250 Euro less than the GTX 1070 that is useless at 1080 and only 10Euro more in shop than GTX960 2g that is a bit limited for the exercise...
bang for buck
i was waiting this review to see if i take the 6g or the 3g for updating my GF computer.
THX a lot Hilbert
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6080
Senior Member
Posts: 6080
Posted on: 08/22/2016 03:17 PM
Just to clarify - this isn't just a 3GB VRAM difference. Stuff like CUDA cores and shader units are slightly cut back too, which explains why this GPU's performance still suffers even at 1080p resolutions. If the only spec that changed was the amount of VRAM, I suspect this GPU would perform just about equal with the 6GB model (in 1080p games). Nvidia's memory compression is pretty decent.
Just to clarify - this isn't just a 3GB VRAM difference. Stuff like CUDA cores and shader units are slightly cut back too, which explains why this GPU's performance still suffers even at 1080p resolutions. If the only spec that changed was the amount of VRAM, I suspect this GPU would perform just about equal with the 6GB model (in 1080p games). Nvidia's memory compression is pretty decent.
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11408
Senior Member
Posts: 11408
Posted on: 08/22/2016 03:56 PM
Weird product from Nvidia. Idk who is this made for...
Nevertheless good review, HH.
A+ post, very constructive.
Like amd's lineup makes any sense. 4gb/8gb 470s and 480s.
They should have made the 470 4gb and 480 8gb.
But all we see is your praise for amd and troll posts in nv sections.
3GB card is plenty for lower resolutions. Don't see how that is hard to understand
Weird product from Nvidia. Idk who is this made for...
Nevertheless good review, HH.
A+ post, very constructive.
Like amd's lineup makes any sense. 4gb/8gb 470s and 480s.
They should have made the 470 4gb and 480 8gb.
But all we see is your praise for amd and troll posts in nv sections.
3GB card is plenty for lower resolutions. Don't see how that is hard to understand
pages 1 2 3 4 5
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 16425
Weird product from Nvidia. Idk who is this made for...
Nevertheless good review, HH.