ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
MSI B450 Tomahawk review
Posted by: on: 07/31/2018 03:00 PM [
5 comment(s) ]
We review the MSI B450 Tomahawk, based on the new B450 chipset it is aimed at for Ryzen processors, and in specific the new Ryzen 2000 / Zen+. The new B450 series chipset based board offer some more appealing value, as budget wise this board sells at a sub 109,- USD/EUR price point. It is a lovely looking value alternative and hey, there's very little LED bling as also.
Read article
Advertisement
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 45876
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 45876
Posted on: 07/31/2018 04:00 PM
What are you referring to? It is what has been written, MP x42 and the rest at auto.
There is probably some mistake in the OC page in the steps applied in BIOS to achieve the 4.2 GHz.
What are you referring to? It is what has been written, MP x42 and the rest at auto.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Posted on: 07/31/2018 04:07 PM
From component selection, board looks rather cheap. Then I see that one redeeming factor: M.2 slot above GPU
And then: "Am I blind? Where's 2nd M.2?" So, I go to place where Hilbert writes about just one M.2 slot.
For $109 ... I think board should have been mATX to save on PCB as there is no 2nd M.2 anyway. I would not dare to use 2 GPUs there as next guy anyway. Temperature wise, I do not think those power phases are that kind of cool under shown stress. Maybe FLIR of back of PCB cloud show something more.
Their Gamer BIOS is nice feature for average guy who wants one click solution. I considered it annoying and featureless.
But they have that AMD's ramdrive solution and Flashback+ => BIOS flash does not even need CPU.
All in all, not bad board for plug and play user. It just could have been bit better and bit cheaper at same time.
From component selection, board looks rather cheap. Then I see that one redeeming factor: M.2 slot above GPU
And then: "Am I blind? Where's 2nd M.2?" So, I go to place where Hilbert writes about just one M.2 slot.
For $109 ... I think board should have been mATX to save on PCB as there is no 2nd M.2 anyway. I would not dare to use 2 GPUs there as next guy anyway. Temperature wise, I do not think those power phases are that kind of cool under shown stress. Maybe FLIR of back of PCB cloud show something more.
Their Gamer BIOS is nice feature for average guy who wants one click solution. I considered it annoying and featureless.
But they have that AMD's ramdrive solution and Flashback+ => BIOS flash does not even need CPU.
All in all, not bad board for plug and play user. It just could have been bit better and bit cheaper at same time.
SuperAverage
Senior Member
Posts: 247
Senior Member
Posts: 247
Posted on: 07/31/2018 04:52 PM
Can you check DPC latency on this board please?
Can you check DPC latency on this board please?
The Edge
Member
Posts: 89
Member
Posts: 89
Posted on: 07/31/2018 09:31 PM
Well in the 1st point, you write that MP x42 and rest at auto wasn't stable. Then in the other points, you write the same thing and that is suddenly stable ?
What are you referring to? It is what has been written, MP x42 and the rest at auto.
Well in the 1st point, you write that MP x42 and rest at auto wasn't stable. Then in the other points, you write the same thing and that is suddenly stable ?
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 89
There is probably some mistake in the OC page in the steps applied in BIOS to achieve the 4.2 GHz. Other than that, these boards look fantastic for someone building a gaming PC right now. But this time I would go for the Gigabyte based on the VRM temps.