Intel Core i5 11400F processor review

Posted on: 04/26/2021 07:13 AM

---

you think 200% difference is due to cache on ryzen ? or even possible between two modern six cores ?




look at hitman numbers here

that russian video is just weird.but then again,most russian internet stuff is just fake

It's the rocket lake problem. Cache is worse on them and some review mentioned some games had much worse 0.1% lows than comet lake. I will look it up later, maybe i can find more data

Posted on: 04/26/2021 07:43 AM

---

Intel brought some value with 11xxxF series. They do afford it. Will bring down prices of AMD in future but not when they have a chip shortage.

Posted on: 04/26/2021 09:35 AM

---

please do cause it sounds improbable and I never saw it reported anywhere except you and that russian youtube video.
if they're getting 14fps 1% values where others are getting over 100 then their setup is the problem.

Posted on: 04/26/2021 10:40 AM

---

I checked GN video now and 11400f had much better lows than comet lake . So russians f-ckd something up with OC, resulting in negative performance . Had same with 2000 FCLK on my 5600X , everything seemed stable but performance was lower than 1933 FCLK.

TPU frametime bench also didn't find anything special.

Posted on: 04/26/2021 11:49 AM

---

I checked GN video now and 11400f had much better lows than comet lake . So russians f-ckd something up with OC, resulting in negative performance . Had same with 2000 FCLK on my 5600X , everything seemed stable but performance was lower than 1933 FCLK.

TPU frametime bench also didn't find anything special.
yup that's what I thought that system is unstable