ASRock Z690 Taichi review
Radeon RX 6500 XT review
MSI Vigor GK71 Sonic keyboard review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Suprim X 12GB review
TeamGroup A440 PRO Special 5eries 4TB NVMe review
Core i5 12400 processor review
MSI MAG B660M Mortar WIFI review
Biostar Z690 Valkyrie review
TeamGroup A440 PRO PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
DDR5 scaling with G.Skill TridentZ5 6000 CL36 review
G.Skill TridentZ Royal DDR4 4000 MHz CL17 (4x 8GB) review
Posted by: on: 11/11/2020 03:11 PM [
28 comment(s) ]
Today, we are looking at G.Skill TridentZ Royal 4000 MHz CL17 memory in a 32 GB set consisting of four 8 GB modules. At the end of 2018, we had an opportunity to check a lower-clocked kit from that series (3200 MHz), but the capacity was 2 x 8 GB back then.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
G.Skill
pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
kakiharaFRS
Senior Member
Posts: 795
Senior Member
Posts: 795
Posted on: 11/11/2020 03:45 PM
yep too bad like everyone I think we are interest to see what 4000Mhz changes on the new Ryzen but it's ok we can wait
4000Mhz is only supported by a few good bin cpus if I understood right ?!
anway what I wanted to say is that I've got several Corsair memory sticks but also 4 g.skill 3600Mhz and not only do the g.skill boot easier with cpu overclock, crash less in aida64 stress test but they systematically give me better results, if you don't care about corsair icue rgb definitely go with g.skill
p.s. the g.skill rgb app doesn't drain much system ressources if you keep to simple colors or turn the rgb off, avoid complex rgb effects especially the "audio visualizer", it will make you lose a few fps and benchmark points for sure, also use 5% or more cpu depending on what your cpu is (a 8 cores or less will definitely feel it)
yep too bad like everyone I think we are interest to see what 4000Mhz changes on the new Ryzen but it's ok we can wait
4000Mhz is only supported by a few good bin cpus if I understood right ?!
anway what I wanted to say is that I've got several Corsair memory sticks but also 4 g.skill 3600Mhz and not only do the g.skill boot easier with cpu overclock, crash less in aida64 stress test but they systematically give me better results, if you don't care about corsair icue rgb definitely go with g.skill
p.s. the g.skill rgb app doesn't drain much system ressources if you keep to simple colors or turn the rgb off, avoid complex rgb effects especially the "audio visualizer", it will make you lose a few fps and benchmark points for sure, also use 5% or more cpu depending on what your cpu is (a 8 cores or less will definitely feel it)
SpajdrEX
AMD Vanguard
Posts: 2887
AMD Vanguard
Posts: 2887
Posted on: 11/11/2020 03:50 PM
Yep, I also would like to see it tested with intel 10x00 / Ryzen 5x00 and something faster than RTX2080Ti, any change to do that @Hilbert Hagedoorn mate
?
Yep, I also would like to see it tested with intel 10x00 / Ryzen 5x00 and something faster than RTX2080Ti, any change to do that @Hilbert Hagedoorn mate
?
squalles
Senior Member
Posts: 880
Senior Member
Posts: 880
Posted on: 11/11/2020 04:18 PM
exactly, mainly 5900x vs i9 10900k
Yep, I also would like to see it tested with intel 10x00 / Ryzen 5x00 and something faster than RTX2080Ti, any change to do that @Hilbert Hagedoorn mate ?
?exactly, mainly 5900x vs i9 10900k
GREGIX
Senior Member
Posts: 770
Senior Member
Posts: 770
Posted on: 11/11/2020 04:18 PM
Intels read score way too low. Probably some secondary, like tWR or tCWL too loose, and tRAS
Intels read score way too low. Probably some secondary, like tWR or tCWL too loose, and tRAS
pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1166
No tests with the amd 5000 series?