Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
GPUScore Relic Of Life benchmarks with 22 GPUs
Posted by: on: 03/08/2022 04:58 PM [
76 comment(s) ]
There is a new benchmark in town, fabricated by ex-Futuremark employees Basemark GPUScore Relic of life has been released in an aim to measure Hybrid Raytracing on VULKAN and DirectX12.
Read article
Advertisement
pages « 2 3 4 5 > »
Odarnok
Member
Posts: 62
Member
Posts: 62
Posted on: 03/08/2022 11:36 PM
Actually I have both a 6900xt and a 3090 both liquid cooled both the same system exactly bar the GPU, I also feel this Benchmark is unfair as it targets specific features of the Nvidia cards, on a Day to Day basis if we take away the specific RTX requirements from games and just base it on performance of the GPU to render frames then both look the same, the FPS is pretty identical within a few percent and to be truthful the 6900xt uses a lot less power to render the same images and frame rates.
Singling out specific features as this does is just painting yourself into a corner or being paid handsomely to make a certain party look very good and its technology very relevant,
It's simple:
Please, could you say the DX12/Vulkan instructions that AMD doesn't support?
AMD affirms their RX 6000 are DX12 Ultimate cards
https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/directx12
If it's true, the difference is at hardware level, and that is AMD fault, not a benchmark's biases.
If you want make a benchmark, you must crush the hardware, all the hardware.
If the future RX7900 destroys the RTX 4090 in this test, will it mean that the test is made to favor AMD?
No, it would mean that AMD has improved a lot in the parts that this test uses.
The same thing happened years ago with tessellation, when ATI users complained that games used it too much, but forgot about it as soon as ATI/AMD cards got good enough.
Actually I have both a 6900xt and a 3090 both liquid cooled both the same system exactly bar the GPU, I also feel this Benchmark is unfair as it targets specific features of the Nvidia cards, on a Day to Day basis if we take away the specific RTX requirements from games and just base it on performance of the GPU to render frames then both look the same, the FPS is pretty identical within a few percent and to be truthful the 6900xt uses a lot less power to render the same images and frame rates.
Singling out specific features as this does is just painting yourself into a corner or being paid handsomely to make a certain party look very good and its technology very relevant,
It's simple:
Please, could you say the DX12/Vulkan instructions that AMD doesn't support?
AMD affirms their RX 6000 are DX12 Ultimate cards
https://www.amd.com/en/technologies/directx12
If it's true, the difference is at hardware level, and that is AMD fault, not a benchmark's biases.
If you want make a benchmark, you must crush the hardware, all the hardware.
If the future RX7900 destroys the RTX 4090 in this test, will it mean that the test is made to favor AMD?
No, it would mean that AMD has improved a lot in the parts that this test uses.
The same thing happened years ago with tessellation, when ATI users complained that games used it too much, but forgot about it as soon as ATI/AMD cards got good enough.
Alessio1989
Senior Member
Posts: 2299
Senior Member
Posts: 2299
Posted on: 03/08/2022 11:41 PM
outside the fact vulkan is another extension crapfield by khronos group, you can write code in ANY API that gives huge advantages to a specific hardware instead to another. It always has been.
outside the fact vulkan is another extension crapfield by khronos group, you can write code in ANY API that gives huge advantages to a specific hardware instead to another. It always has been.
Mineria
Senior Member
Posts: 5436
Senior Member
Posts: 5436
Posted on: 03/09/2022 02:42 AM
rubbish benchmark for nvidia oriented effects should be used to test nvidia only cards
Even the port royal isnt so punishing for amd cards. It makes no sense using something as a regular benchmark that favors one side so much.
D3D12 and Vulkan Raytraced performance.
That is where those AMD cards got their weakness, without they are pretty much on pair, better in some games and worse in others.
That is where those AMD cards got their weakness, without they are pretty much on pair, better in some games and worse in others.
Krizby
Senior Member
Posts: 1425
Senior Member
Posts: 1425
Posted on: 03/09/2022 03:02 AM
Hm...this benchmark does look pretty resembling to actual games with RTGI
10055
10054
10056
Hm...this benchmark does look pretty resembling to actual games with RTGI
10055
10054
10056
pages « 2 3 4 5 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1436
Still slower than a 3090!!!
I'm just kidding here guys, love y"all