Asrock B550 PG Riptide review
be quiet! Dark Rock TF2 review
Basemark GPU v1.2 benchmarks with 36 GPUs
Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
GeForce RTX 2060 review (founder)
Posted by: on: 01/07/2019 04:00 PM [
137 comment(s) ]
We review the 4th version graphics card in the NVIDIA RTX series, as the Founder edition GeForce RTX 2060 has arrived for a review. These cards start at 349 USD for the reference design from NVIDIA. But will they have enough oomph to make a difference in a saturated market?
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
geforce rtx review,
nvidia
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 16463
Senior Member
Posts: 16463
Posted on: 01/07/2019 04:21 PM
Nice review. Overall card it does offers a 1070ti performance.
BF5 ray tracing performance was abysmal. I can imagine Metro will probably run even worse.
Nice review. Overall card it does offers a 1070ti performance.
BF5 ray tracing performance was abysmal. I can imagine Metro will probably run even worse.
warlord
Senior Member
Posts: 2761
Senior Member
Posts: 2761
Posted on: 01/07/2019 04:24 PM
Nice review. Overall card it does offers a 1070ti performance.
BF5 ray tracing performance was abysmal. I can imagine Metro will probably run even worse.
It was Ultra setting. Without RT it was only 5fps behind 2070 in 1080p. If RT was low/medium perhaps it could achieve much more than 60fps. So it is a great card for the money.
Nice review. Overall card it does offers a 1070ti performance.
BF5 ray tracing performance was abysmal. I can imagine Metro will probably run even worse.
It was Ultra setting. Without RT it was only 5fps behind 2070 in 1080p. If RT was low/medium perhaps it could achieve much more than 60fps. So it is a great card for the money.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 16463
Senior Member
Posts: 16463
Posted on: 01/07/2019 04:32 PM
48fps at ultra so low setting will probably run at 60fps but dont forget thats a 1080p.
Maybe HH will include lower RT settings in next benchmarks.
It was Ultra setting. Without RT it was only 5fps behind 2070 in 1080p. If RT was low/medium perhaps it could achieve much more than 60fps. So it is a great card for the money.
48fps at ultra so low setting will probably run at 60fps but dont forget thats a 1080p.
Maybe HH will include lower RT settings in next benchmarks.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Posted on: 01/07/2019 04:34 PM
Well, As expected from parameters. Little OC to match 2070 in power consumption and it is almost same performer.
Almost $500 performance for $350.
Well, As expected from parameters. Little OC to match 2070 in power consumption and it is almost same performer.
Almost $500 performance for $350.
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2761
I was correct since day 1. Equal to 1070ti and faster than Vega 56.
Thanks for the great review boss. Nice and quick work as always.