Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
FSP Hydro G Pro 1000W (ATX 3.0, 1000W PSU) review
GeForce RTX 2060 review (founder)
Posted by: on: 01/07/2019 04:00 PM [
137 comment(s) ]
We review the 4th version graphics card in the NVIDIA RTX series, as the Founder edition GeForce RTX 2060 has arrived for a review. These cards start at 349 USD for the reference design from NVIDIA. But will they have enough oomph to make a difference in a saturated market?
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
geforce rtx review,
nvidia
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 21187
Senior Member
Posts: 21187
Posted on: 01/07/2019 04:21 PM
Nice review. Overall card it does offers a 1070ti performance.
BF5 ray tracing performance was abysmal. I can imagine Metro will probably run even worse.
Nice review. Overall card it does offers a 1070ti performance.
BF5 ray tracing performance was abysmal. I can imagine Metro will probably run even worse.
warlord
Senior Member
Posts: 2760
Senior Member
Posts: 2760
Posted on: 01/07/2019 04:24 PM
Nice review. Overall card it does offers a 1070ti performance.
BF5 ray tracing performance was abysmal. I can imagine Metro will probably run even worse.
It was Ultra setting. Without RT it was only 5fps behind 2070 in 1080p. If RT was low/medium perhaps it could achieve much more than 60fps. So it is a great card for the money.
Nice review. Overall card it does offers a 1070ti performance.
BF5 ray tracing performance was abysmal. I can imagine Metro will probably run even worse.
It was Ultra setting. Without RT it was only 5fps behind 2070 in 1080p. If RT was low/medium perhaps it could achieve much more than 60fps. So it is a great card for the money.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 21187
Senior Member
Posts: 21187
Posted on: 01/07/2019 04:32 PM
48fps at ultra so low setting will probably run at 60fps but dont forget thats a 1080p.
Maybe HH will include lower RT settings in next benchmarks.
It was Ultra setting. Without RT it was only 5fps behind 2070 in 1080p. If RT was low/medium perhaps it could achieve much more than 60fps. So it is a great card for the money.
48fps at ultra so low setting will probably run at 60fps but dont forget thats a 1080p.
Maybe HH will include lower RT settings in next benchmarks.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Senior Member
Posts: 11808
Posted on: 01/07/2019 04:34 PM
Well, As expected from parameters. Little OC to match 2070 in power consumption and it is almost same performer.
Almost $500 performance for $350.
Well, As expected from parameters. Little OC to match 2070 in power consumption and it is almost same performer.
Almost $500 performance for $350.
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 2760
I was correct since day 1. Equal to 1070ti and faster than Vega 56.
Thanks for the great review boss. Nice and quick work as always.