Team Group MP34 NVME SSD (512GB) review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Gaming OC review
Anno 1800: PC graphics performance benchmark review
NZXT H500 Overwatch Special Edition review
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Twin Fan 6 GB Review
Corsair Carbide 275Q review
Cooler Master MK850 keyboard review
WD Blue SN500 NVME SSD (250GB) Review
ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme Alpha review
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Review
Posted by: on: 03/09/2017 03:00 PM [
144 comment(s) ]
In this article we'll look at the fastest graphics card your money can get you, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti based on Pascal architecture. Armed with 11GB of GDDR5X graphics memory and that all new GP102-350 GPU, we are certain we're gonna break some records today.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
nvidia,
geforce 1080 ti
pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
Clouseau
Senior Member
Posts: 2208
Senior Member
Posts: 2208
Posted on: 03/09/2017 11:34 PM
One does not know how high a price the market will bear until total units sold start to dip because of price. Why on earth would anyone keep prices low when evidence shows higher prices will be tolerated? Obviously there is a point to where the difference in performance is not worth it. Has it been forgotten that as soon as a product hits the shelves, it is already outdated? Something better is always around the corner.
EDIT: One always buys the best their budget allows. Fortunately, one cannot miss what has never been experienced.
One does not know how high a price the market will bear until total units sold start to dip because of price. Why on earth would anyone keep prices low when evidence shows higher prices will be tolerated? Obviously there is a point to where the difference in performance is not worth it. Has it been forgotten that as soon as a product hits the shelves, it is already outdated? Something better is always around the corner.
EDIT: One always buys the best their budget allows. Fortunately, one cannot miss what has never been experienced.
Arbie
Senior Member
Posts: 127
Senior Member
Posts: 127
Posted on: 03/10/2017 12:06 AM
Cooling and noise:
I like the blower design because it puts less load on the case ventilation.
HOWEVER, I am amazed that at this price level NVidia does so poorly with the metal strip holding the air exit vent, video connectors etc. It looks like a 1980 product. The ribs forming the vent are simply stamped flat metal, with square edges. With so much air going past, these ribs would create much less noise if they were thin, rounded elements e.g. a wire mesh. Besides that, the grille could be more open - it only needs to prevent a finger going in, and even then you couldn't reach the fan blades.
Not an airflow engineer but it seems clear that for almost no extra cost NVidia could have done much better on this metric. If they can design a 12 billion transistor chip, why can't they design a metal grille? If I did buy one of these I'd want to nurg out the whole area and just leave a big hole. That should improve airflow as well, and reduce what throttling there is.
Cooling and noise:
I like the blower design because it puts less load on the case ventilation.
HOWEVER, I am amazed that at this price level NVidia does so poorly with the metal strip holding the air exit vent, video connectors etc. It looks like a 1980 product. The ribs forming the vent are simply stamped flat metal, with square edges. With so much air going past, these ribs would create much less noise if they were thin, rounded elements e.g. a wire mesh. Besides that, the grille could be more open - it only needs to prevent a finger going in, and even then you couldn't reach the fan blades.
Not an airflow engineer but it seems clear that for almost no extra cost NVidia could have done much better on this metric. If they can design a 12 billion transistor chip, why can't they design a metal grille? If I did buy one of these I'd want to nurg out the whole area and just leave a big hole. That should improve airflow as well, and reduce what throttling there is.
MrBonk
Senior Member
Posts: 2885
Senior Member
Posts: 2885
Posted on: 03/10/2017 12:06 AM
I have to disagree, people who want to run at 120FPS. Even if the CPU can't keep up, it shouldn't have trouble hitting 120FPS.
Then there's Fast-Sync for online games that can run at very high framerates to ditch the tearing you get while still having super low latency.
But also, it makes sense for 1080p if you are still playing DX9 games with SGSSAA. As even on these high end cards, 8xSGSSAA at 1080p can push them very very hard depending on the game.
Then there's the scenario where one has a 1080p monitor but they use downsampling from 4k or higher or downsampling in combination with forced AA.
There's plenty of scenarios where 1080p makes sense with a card like this.
As such, if you are a 1080p gamer, this card might be a bit out of your comfort zone; it isn't going to make much sense as at 1920x1080 you'll be limited by your processor, as yes, even the fastest 8 and 10 core processors will not be able to keep up properly.
I have to disagree, people who want to run at 120FPS. Even if the CPU can't keep up, it shouldn't have trouble hitting 120FPS.
Then there's Fast-Sync for online games that can run at very high framerates to ditch the tearing you get while still having super low latency.
But also, it makes sense for 1080p if you are still playing DX9 games with SGSSAA. As even on these high end cards, 8xSGSSAA at 1080p can push them very very hard depending on the game.
Then there's the scenario where one has a 1080p monitor but they use downsampling from 4k or higher or downsampling in combination with forced AA.
There's plenty of scenarios where 1080p makes sense with a card like this.
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 842
Senior Member
Posts: 842
Posted on: 03/10/2017 12:45 AM
Yes, it isn't "bugs"--it's actually optimization and compilers. That will take a few weeks to get sorted--it's a brand-new architecture and it isn't
a copy of Intel's, for sure...
So, that's why it needs game code optimization along with its own compilers (as was also true of Athlon.) As you note, the power is there--it's just the optimizations that need to happen now.
There's no point in digging deeper into this before the bugs are sorted out. AMD and MS are already aware of it, as are the game developers, so eventually the situation will become better. How much better, who knows, but since the CPU performs well in heavily multi-threaded applications, beating twice as expensive Intels, they do have the power.
Yes, it isn't "bugs"--it's actually optimization and compilers. That will take a few weeks to get sorted--it's a brand-new architecture and it isn't
a copy of Intel's, for sure...
So, that's why it needs game code optimization along with its own compilers (as was also true of Athlon.) As you note, the power is there--it's just the optimizations that need to happen now.
Mostafa Hijazi
Senior Member
Posts: 703
Senior Member
Posts: 703
Posted on: 03/10/2017 01:00 AM
Great card and a great review ! Are you going to do an SLI review ?
Great card and a great review ! Are you going to do an SLI review ?
SirDremor
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Posted on: 03/10/2017 08:29 AM
Awesome card! Nvidia, awesome job!
HH, top review!
With such power it is rather tempting to return from my gaming retirement!
Awesome card! Nvidia, awesome job!
HH, top review!
With such power it is rather tempting to return from my gaming retirement!
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 861
Senior Member
Posts: 861
Posted on: 03/10/2017 08:44 AM
Awesome card! Nvidia, awesome job!
HH, top review!
With such power it is rather tempting to return from my gaming retirement!
There is probably no point in testing sli anymore other than to show its not being supported like it used to be.
Awesome card! Nvidia, awesome job!
HH, top review!
With such power it is rather tempting to return from my gaming retirement!
There is probably no point in testing sli anymore other than to show its not being supported like it used to be.
rm082e
Senior Member
Posts: 458
Senior Member
Posts: 458
Posted on: 03/10/2017 03:11 PM
At least in the US market, this is the closest thing I found fitting your description:
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIABHJ4YS7340&cm-re=curved-display---0JC-0009-000A6---Product
Honestly, it's a pretty decent price considering what it is.
Thank you!
If you're not concerned with refresh rates then why do you care about G/Free-Sync? To my knowledge, v-sync still prevents screen tearing at frame rates below 60FPS.
Because when the frame rate drops below 60 with V-Sync on, games gets really stuttery. Adaptive refresh keeps the game feeling relatively smooth when you're in the 45-60fps range.
At least in the US market, this is the closest thing I found fitting your description:
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIABHJ4YS7340&cm-re=curved-display---0JC-0009-000A6---Product
Honestly, it's a pretty decent price considering what it is.
Thank you!
If you're not concerned with refresh rates then why do you care about G/Free-Sync? To my knowledge, v-sync still prevents screen tearing at frame rates below 60FPS.
Because when the frame rate drops below 60 with V-Sync on, games gets really stuttery. Adaptive refresh keeps the game feeling relatively smooth when you're in the 45-60fps range.
geogan
Senior Member
Posts: 322
Senior Member
Posts: 322
Posted on: 03/10/2017 04:08 PM
A card like this needs to also be tested for what it might actually be useful for which is a triple 27" monitor setup with 2560x1440 on each display for a total of 11Mpixels which is more than UltraHD of 8Mpixels.
That's what I am interested in it for.
Those with a single 2560x1440 monitor or even more stupidly a 1080P monitor are only wasting their time and money looking at this.
A card like this needs to also be tested for what it might actually be useful for which is a triple 27" monitor setup with 2560x1440 on each display for a total of 11Mpixels which is more than UltraHD of 8Mpixels.
That's what I am interested in it for.
Those with a single 2560x1440 monitor or even more stupidly a 1080P monitor are only wasting their time and money looking at this.
Redemption80
Senior Member
Posts: 18186
Senior Member
Posts: 18186
Posted on: 03/10/2017 04:33 PM
How are they stupid,? This is the first card that is ideal for a single high refresh 1080/1440 screen.
On the other hand it isn't powerful enough for 2x1440.
How are they stupid,? This is the first card that is ideal for a single high refresh 1080/1440 screen.
On the other hand it isn't powerful enough for 2x1440.
Embra
Senior Member
Posts: 794
Senior Member
Posts: 794
Posted on: 03/10/2017 04:40 PM
The big hope for these cards are 4k play. The top end Vega will be judged the same way.
Pretty good performance over the X model. I thought it might be a tad below.
The big hope for these cards are 4k play. The top end Vega will be judged the same way.
Pretty good performance over the X model. I thought it might be a tad below.
ChisChas
Member
Posts: 94
Member
Posts: 94
Posted on: 03/10/2017 06:30 PM
Great review Hilbert, thank you. We finally have a 4K card for just gaming.
+1 for a SLI review please
Great review Hilbert, thank you. We finally have a 4K card for just gaming.
+1 for a SLI review please
ChisChas
Member
Posts: 94
Member
Posts: 94
Posted on: 03/10/2017 06:32 PM
But let's have a test in SLI to see where we are?
There is probably no point in testing sli anymore other than to show its not being supported like it used to be.
But let's have a test in SLI to see where we are?
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9091
Senior Member
Posts: 9091
Posted on: 03/10/2017 07:48 PM
A card like this needs to also be tested for what it might actually be useful for which is a triple 27" monitor setup with 2560x1440 on each display for a total of 11Mpixels which is more than UltraHD of 8Mpixels.
That's what I am interested in it for.
Those with a single 2560x1440 monitor or even more stupidly a 1080P monitor are only wasting their time and money looking at this.
Not really, but okay. You can still see minimum frames below 60 with a 1080ti at QHD.
A card like this needs to also be tested for what it might actually be useful for which is a triple 27" monitor setup with 2560x1440 on each display for a total of 11Mpixels which is more than UltraHD of 8Mpixels.
That's what I am interested in it for.
Those with a single 2560x1440 monitor or even more stupidly a 1080P monitor are only wasting their time and money looking at this.
Not really, but okay. You can still see minimum frames below 60 with a 1080ti at QHD.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 11983
Senior Member
Posts: 11983
Posted on: 03/10/2017 08:01 PM
**** it. I bought one. Gonna buy an EK block and shove it on there. I never want below 60fps ever again lol
**** it. I bought one. Gonna buy an EK block and shove it on there. I never want below 60fps ever again lol
Solfaur
Senior Member
Posts: 6993
Senior Member
Posts: 6993
Posted on: 03/10/2017 08:14 PM
I'm looking forward to mine as well, though it will likely take some weeks till I can buy it here (MSI Gaming on that is).
Let us know how much you squeeze out of it!
**** it. I bought one. Gonna buy an EK block and shove it on there. I never want below 60fps ever again lol
I'm looking forward to mine as well, though it will likely take some weeks till I can buy it here (MSI Gaming on that is).
Let us know how much you squeeze out of it!
bemaniac
Senior Member
Posts: 252
Senior Member
Posts: 252
Posted on: 03/10/2017 08:31 PM
I'm mad. I bought one.
I'm mad. I bought one.
GeniusPr0
Senior Member
Posts: 1222
Senior Member
Posts: 1222
Posted on: 03/10/2017 09:31 PM
Enjoy the cards, pretty sure they'll be faster than Vega anyway.
Enjoy the cards, pretty sure they'll be faster than Vega anyway.
eclap
Senior Member
Posts: 31501
Senior Member
Posts: 31501
Posted on: 03/10/2017 09:34 PM
$1200 card is beaten by a $700 card by the same company after 10 months when they had the ability and saw the need to release what they needed to release at the price point they saw would be best for sales. What's so surprising?
People who buy Titans don't need anyone's pity. They knew exactly what they were buying. The fastest GeForce gaming GPU at the time of release for the highest sum of money.
If you have a problem with the Titan's price point, well, don't buy Titans. But don't breathe down the necks of those who do.
Yep and the next round of Titans will do exactly the same, it'll sell and nobody will regret it. Titans have been around for years and fair play, the first time it happened, I can understand people got upset, but nowadays it's common practise and it's just how the market works.
I honestly don't understand why someone has a problem with rich people spending money.
$1200 card is beaten by a $700 card by the same company after 10 months when they had the ability and saw the need to release what they needed to release at the price point they saw would be best for sales. What's so surprising?
People who buy Titans don't need anyone's pity. They knew exactly what they were buying. The fastest GeForce gaming GPU at the time of release for the highest sum of money.
If you have a problem with the Titan's price point, well, don't buy Titans. But don't breathe down the necks of those who do.
Yep and the next round of Titans will do exactly the same, it'll sell and nobody will regret it. Titans have been around for years and fair play, the first time it happened, I can understand people got upset, but nowadays it's common practise and it's just how the market works.
I honestly don't understand why someone has a problem with rich people spending money.
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 7115
Senior Member
Posts: 7115
Posted on: 03/10/2017 10:33 PM
Any idea when the non-reference ones will release?
Any idea when the non-reference ones will release?
ScoobyDooby
Senior Member
Posts: 7087
Senior Member
Posts: 7087
Posted on: 03/10/2017 10:50 PM
You should know by now. Sucks, and sorry that you got one, but you should.
I am stoked for this card, but gonna wait to see how the later Asus/MSI card does OC and then pick whichever does best.
I'm mad. I bought one.
You should know by now. Sucks, and sorry that you got one, but you should.
I am stoked for this card, but gonna wait to see how the later Asus/MSI card does OC and then pick whichever does best.
bemaniac
Senior Member
Posts: 252
Senior Member
Posts: 252
Posted on: 03/10/2017 11:01 PM
I like to get maximum days out of my investment. Upgrade to a 1180ti in 2 years or whatnot like I did with these puppies. Just generally grateful I only needed 1 card for 4k really after having to play every freaking release on one 980ti and having to turn down settings as my second card sat there with a goofy smile.
That and I'll be putting an all in one watercooler on it asap. Also I got an Asus insteado f EVGA this time as the early EVGAs never seem to clock well because they have so many higher binned variants.
I like to get maximum days out of my investment. Upgrade to a 1180ti in 2 years or whatnot like I did with these puppies. Just generally grateful I only needed 1 card for 4k really after having to play every freaking release on one 980ti and having to turn down settings as my second card sat there with a goofy smile.
That and I'll be putting an all in one watercooler on it asap. Also I got an Asus insteado f EVGA this time as the early EVGAs never seem to clock well because they have so many higher binned variants.
Elder III
Senior Member
Posts: 3529
Senior Member
Posts: 3529
Posted on: 03/11/2017 12:08 AM
I've got one in the mail to me right now. I think it should be pretty good for 4K even at stock, but if it get's too loud or hot overclocked I can always drop an Arctic Acellero IV for $60 on it down the road. Not having to pay a stupid "premium" for a reference card (like the 1080 was last year) made me allot more willing to go for it this time. My 1080 Strix sold in a heartbeat last week, so I can't wait any longer to see what the AIB products are priced like.
I've got one in the mail to me right now. I think it should be pretty good for 4K even at stock, but if it get's too loud or hot overclocked I can always drop an Arctic Acellero IV for $60 on it down the road. Not having to pay a stupid "premium" for a reference card (like the 1080 was last year) made me allot more willing to go for it this time. My 1080 Strix sold in a heartbeat last week, so I can't wait any longer to see what the AIB products are priced like.
KissSh0t
Senior Member
Posts: 6610
Senior Member
Posts: 6610
Posted on: 03/11/2017 12:39 AM
I don't know why but the idea of 11GB and not 12GB makes my eye twitch.
I don't know why but the idea of 11GB and not 12GB makes my eye twitch.
pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Posts: 4663
That's because the framerates at 1080p are often in excess of 144FPS and only two 1080p monitors go beyond 144Hz, to 240Hz, where diminishing returns apply.
To put things in perspective, you would be choosing between a 1080p 240Hz TN panel with not-so-great color quality while you could easily be cruising along with a 1440p 165Hz IPS panel with the best of all worlds, so to speak.
It would also be the case for quite a few titles that even with a very fast CPU, you would not be getting the full potential of this GPU, even if the averages are higher (the minima might still be the same and the maxima might not be higher than the CPU allows).