Guru3D Thermal Paste Roundup 2019
Back-to-school Microsoft Office 2016 $18 Win 10 Pro $12
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan 1TB SSD Review
Corsair K57 RGB Wireless keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review
PowerColor 5700 RED DEVIL review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT ROG STRIX review
ViewSonic Elite XG240R Monitor Review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Review
Posted by: on: 03/09/2017 04:00 PM [
143 comment(s) ]
In this article we'll look at the fastest graphics card your money can get you, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti based on Pascal architecture. Armed with 11GB of GDDR5X graphics memory and that all new GP102-350 GPU, we are certain we're gonna break some records today.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
nvidia,
geforce 1080 ti
pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
rm082e
Senior Member
Posts: 491
Senior Member
Posts: 491
Posted on: 03/09/2017 08:09 PM
Has there been a monitor yet that has all of the following features:
1. 32" - 40"
2. IPS or VA
3. 4K - 16:9
4. G-Synce or FreeSync
5. Curved screen
I'm on a 27" QHD that I love right now, but I would like a larger presentation at some point. However, I use a pair of 30" Dell monitors at work, and I think they're just at the cusp of needing a curved presentation. I like to sit really close to my screens, so I'm thinking a curved 40" would be a solid step up.
I'm not concerned with refresh rates beyond 60hz.
Has there been a monitor yet that has all of the following features:
1. 32" - 40"
2. IPS or VA
3. 4K - 16:9
4. G-Synce or FreeSync
5. Curved screen
I'm on a 27" QHD that I love right now, but I would like a larger presentation at some point. However, I use a pair of 30" Dell monitors at work, and I think they're just at the cusp of needing a curved presentation. I like to sit really close to my screens, so I'm thinking a curved 40" would be a solid step up.
I'm not concerned with refresh rates beyond 60hz.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4263
Senior Member
Posts: 4263
Posted on: 03/09/2017 08:20 PM
Has there been a monitor yet that has all of the following features:
1. 32" - 40"
2. IPS or VA
3. 4K - 16:9
4. G-Synce or FreeSync
5. Curved screen
I'm on a 27" QHD that I love right now, but I would like a larger presentation at some point. However, I use a pair of 30" Dell monitors at work, and I think they're just at the cusp of needing a curved presentation. I like to sit really close to my screens, so I'm thinking a curved 40" would be a solid step up.
I'm not concerned with refresh rates beyond 60hz.
At least in the US market, this is the closest thing I found fitting your description:
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIABHJ4YS7340&cm-re=curved-display---0JC-0009-000A6---Product
Honestly, it's a pretty decent price considering what it is.
If you're not concerned with refresh rates then why do you care about G/Free-Sync? To my knowledge, v-sync still prevents screen tearing at frame rates below 60FPS.
Personally, I'd rather go for 3 separate monitors, but I'm cheap.
Has there been a monitor yet that has all of the following features:
1. 32" - 40"
2. IPS or VA
3. 4K - 16:9
4. G-Synce or FreeSync
5. Curved screen
I'm on a 27" QHD that I love right now, but I would like a larger presentation at some point. However, I use a pair of 30" Dell monitors at work, and I think they're just at the cusp of needing a curved presentation. I like to sit really close to my screens, so I'm thinking a curved 40" would be a solid step up.
I'm not concerned with refresh rates beyond 60hz.
At least in the US market, this is the closest thing I found fitting your description:
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIABHJ4YS7340&cm-re=curved-display---0JC-0009-000A6---Product
Honestly, it's a pretty decent price considering what it is.
If you're not concerned with refresh rates then why do you care about G/Free-Sync? To my knowledge, v-sync still prevents screen tearing at frame rates below 60FPS.
Personally, I'd rather go for 3 separate monitors, but I'm cheap.
A M D BugBear
Senior Member
Posts: 2788
Senior Member
Posts: 2788
Posted on: 03/09/2017 08:37 PM
Excellent.
Can't wait for Custom Coolers and Hybrid Version.
<<~~~Benchmark Review Thoughts!!!
Excellent.
Can't wait for Custom Coolers and Hybrid Version.
<<~~~Benchmark Review Thoughts!!!
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9447
Senior Member
Posts: 9447
Posted on: 03/09/2017 08:40 PM
1200$+ card vs 699$ card.. I bet all those people that bought titan X are happy
People need to stop buying the "titan" cards cause there just waste money when in 6-8 months if that a 699$ card can beat it,
1200$+ card vs 699$ card.. I bet all those people that bought titan X are happy
People need to stop buying the "titan" cards cause there just waste money when in 6-8 months if that a 699$ card can beat it,
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1561
Senior Member
Posts: 1561
Posted on: 03/09/2017 08:43 PM
To know what it's worth, someone would need to tape shut as much of the grate as a DVI connector would take, and then see if the card could hold the same clocks for an extended period, perhaps also to see if the OC potential remained. After all, it's possible Nvidia was able to clock this a bit higher by dropping the DVI. At least of late, Nvidia has also left more OC room for enthusiasts than AMD.
If you need to ask how much it is, Titan isn't for you.
Not bad, though it seems pretty minimal with as much space as the DVI connector eats.
To know what it's worth, someone would need to tape shut as much of the grate as a DVI connector would take, and then see if the card could hold the same clocks for an extended period, perhaps also to see if the OC potential remained. After all, it's possible Nvidia was able to clock this a bit higher by dropping the DVI. At least of late, Nvidia has also left more OC room for enthusiasts than AMD.
1200$+ card vs 699$ card.. I bet all those people that bought titan X are happy
If you need to ask how much it is, Titan isn't for you.
bombardier
Senior Member
Posts: 217
Senior Member
Posts: 217
Posted on: 03/09/2017 09:03 PM
What about SLI?
What about SLI?
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 6637
Senior Member
Posts: 6637
Posted on: 03/09/2017 09:08 PM
Chances of AMD releasing two 14/16nm GPUs in May/June are very slim imho.
I am hoping for >= GTX1080 level of performance @400-450 Euros.
Killing the competition would imply any Vega-based GPU comes anywhere close to this price point. But yes, there's a good chance this will still outperform the RX 490/590.
Chances of AMD releasing two 14/16nm GPUs in May/June are very slim imho.
I am hoping for >= GTX1080 level of performance @400-450 Euros.
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9447
Senior Member
Posts: 9447
Posted on: 03/09/2017 09:09 PM
If you need to ask how much it is, Titan isn't for you.
I know how much it is, the point it 1200+$ card is bet by 699 card... with years time, it waste money to any one with brain people with money to burn and no brain need not apply cause the reason why card prices keep going cause they know stupid will buy it
If you need to ask how much it is, Titan isn't for you.
I know how much it is, the point it 1200+$ card is bet by 699 card... with years time, it waste money to any one with brain people with money to burn and no brain need not apply cause the reason why card prices keep going cause they know stupid will buy it
StewieTech
Chuck Norris
Posts: 2538
Chuck Norris
Posts: 2538
Posted on: 03/09/2017 09:13 PM
Damn i wish i was rich!
Good card and good review.
Damn i wish i was rich!
Good card and good review.
slick3
Senior Member
Posts: 1732
Senior Member
Posts: 1732
Posted on: 03/09/2017 09:40 PM
Still wondering which kidney to sell, having two is definitely overrated anyway
Still wondering which kidney to sell, having two is definitely overrated anyway
slickric21
Senior Member
Posts: 2458
Senior Member
Posts: 2458
Posted on: 03/09/2017 09:43 PM
I would MUCH rather see Ryzen 1700 vs I7-7700K in 4K than R1800X vs I7-5960X.
Seems I will have to search for that :/
Linustechrips did 1800x vs 7700k in their video review of the 1080ti, all at 4K.
7700k edged all benchmarks iirc except GTAV which Ryzen had better min fps.
Shame they didn't overclock them both aswell to replicate what I suspect most people would do having such cpus.
I would MUCH rather see Ryzen 1700 vs I7-7700K in 4K than R1800X vs I7-5960X.
Seems I will have to search for that :/
Linustechrips did 1800x vs 7700k in their video review of the 1080ti, all at 4K.
7700k edged all benchmarks iirc except GTAV which Ryzen had better min fps.
Shame they didn't overclock them both aswell to replicate what I suspect most people would do having such cpus.
jdc2389
Senior Member
Posts: 170
Senior Member
Posts: 170
Posted on: 03/09/2017 10:03 PM
Ah, so nvidia lied when they said it came from the factory with a 2062mhz boost at the announcement event in SF. Not surprising. I'm sure they gimped it's OC potential with resistors and bios limits again. I almost laughed during the presentation when they brought up async compute as a feature.
Ah, so nvidia lied when they said it came from the factory with a 2062mhz boost at the announcement event in SF. Not surprising. I'm sure they gimped it's OC potential with resistors and bios limits again. I almost laughed during the presentation when they brought up async compute as a feature.
Redemption80
Senior Member
Posts: 18301
Senior Member
Posts: 18301
Posted on: 03/09/2017 10:16 PM
The people who buy the Titan cards know what the story is so won't be disappointe, and a Titan is likely pocket change for many of them.
This does seem like a great card though, the first card that makes 4k look viable and caters to 1440/120 consumers.
The people who buy the Titan cards know what the story is so won't be disappointe, and a Titan is likely pocket change for many of them.
This does seem like a great card though, the first card that makes 4k look viable and caters to 1440/120 consumers.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 12236
Senior Member
Posts: 12236
Posted on: 03/09/2017 10:26 PM
https://youtu.be/KcVwzM-NiVc?t=1732
He clearly says its overclocked.. but I guess it's cooler to just make stuff up.
And they brought up Async Compute as a feature because they just migrated a bunch of their technologies over to utilizing it. They locked the bios presumably because overvolting would damage the card and then people, probably people like you, complain about it and RMA cards for damage that they did.
Ah, so nvidia lied when they said it came from the factory with a 2062mhz boost at the announcement event in SF. Not surprising. I'm sure they gimped it's OC potential with resistors and bios limits again. I almost laughed during the presentation when they brought up async compute as a feature.
https://youtu.be/KcVwzM-NiVc?t=1732
He clearly says its overclocked.. but I guess it's cooler to just make stuff up.
And they brought up Async Compute as a feature because they just migrated a bunch of their technologies over to utilizing it. They locked the bios presumably because overvolting would damage the card and then people, probably people like you, complain about it and RMA cards for damage that they did.
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 6637
Senior Member
Posts: 6637
Posted on: 03/09/2017 10:29 PM
My heart really goes to those poor Titan XP owners who still have the fastest card on the planet, and have been robbed by Nvidia and forced to play at 4k, or 1440/120Hz maxed for all these months
Its good to hear they have not been forgotten
LMAO /sarcasm
My heart really goes to those poor Titan XP owners who still have the fastest card on the planet, and have been robbed by Nvidia and forced to play at 4k, or 1440/120Hz maxed for all these months
Its good to hear they have not been forgotten
LMAO /sarcasm
Elder III
Senior Member
Posts: 3557
Senior Member
Posts: 3557
Posted on: 03/09/2017 10:34 PM
Hilbert, my man, do you have a DB rating for the audio levels once it was overclocked at 65% fan speed?
Thanks!
Hilbert, my man, do you have a DB rating for the audio levels once it was overclocked at 65% fan speed?
Thanks!
Redemption80
Senior Member
Posts: 18301
Senior Member
Posts: 18301
Posted on: 03/09/2017 10:34 PM
It's sad you have to tag that as sarcastic lol.
Feeling sorry for Titan owners is feeling sorry for rich people.
It's sad you have to tag that as sarcastic lol.
Feeling sorry for Titan owners is feeling sorry for rich people.
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 6637
Senior Member
Posts: 6637
Posted on: 03/09/2017 10:45 PM
It's sad you have to tag that as sarcastic lol.
Feeling sorry for Titan owners is feeling sorry for rich people.
Or like when poorest of the poor fight for lower taxes for abominably rich
srry for offtopic,
It's sad you have to tag that as sarcastic lol.
Feeling sorry for Titan owners is feeling sorry for rich people.
Or like when poorest of the poor fight for lower taxes for abominably rich
srry for offtopic,
varkkon
Senior Member
Posts: 131
Senior Member
Posts: 131
Posted on: 03/09/2017 11:20 PM
Massive review Hilbert, thanks a million I still think you do the best reviews out or everyone on the NET.
Man I really want a 1080 Ti, if I can mange it I am going to get the MSI gaming series one, any idea when they will go up for sale? You mentioned in a week or three, I hope so.
Massive review Hilbert, thanks a million I still think you do the best reviews out or everyone on the NET.
Man I really want a 1080 Ti, if I can mange it I am going to get the MSI gaming series one, any idea when they will go up for sale? You mentioned in a week or three, I hope so.
coth
Senior Member
Posts: 405
Senior Member
Posts: 405
Posted on: 03/09/2017 11:44 PM
I guess GTX Volta70 will bring 4K gaming to mainstream with performance level of GTX 1080 Ti.
I guess GTX Volta70 will bring 4K gaming to mainstream with performance level of GTX 1080 Ti.
Margalus
Senior Member
Posts: 202
Senior Member
Posts: 202
Posted on: 03/09/2017 11:45 PM
I don't understand why it says it's not good for 1920x1080 and that anybody playing at that resolution would be cpu limited when every single test in this review with the exception of DOOM clearly shows that even at 1920x1080 the gpu is the limiting factor, not the cpu. There were huge improvements in every game at 1080 over the lower gpu's.
I don't understand why it says it's not good for 1920x1080 and that anybody playing at that resolution would be cpu limited when every single test in this review with the exception of DOOM clearly shows that even at 1920x1080 the gpu is the limiting factor, not the cpu. There were huge improvements in every game at 1080 over the lower gpu's.
jdc2389
Senior Member
Posts: 170
Senior Member
Posts: 170
Posted on: 03/10/2017 12:02 AM
https://youtu.be/KcVwzM-NiVc?t=1732
He clearly says its overclocked.. but I guess it's cooler to just make stuff up.
And they brought up Async Compute as a feature because they just migrated a bunch of their technologies over to utilizing it. They locked the bios presumably because overvolting would damage the card and then people, probably people like you, complain about it and RMA cards for damage that they did. Ah, I rescind my statement about the card not being OCed and it was 2038 hm, my memory is ****. https://youtu.be/L9ZSnI9woWg?t=28m6s that's a proper youtube link btw that one actually works. I was falling asleep at this presentation hahaha. Oh and I think I can speak for anyone about being salty with the OC limits. It was literally impossible without modding the bios because of Vrel or Util. Oh and because of the bios modding I have some weird bios quirks like the card not showing it's real software voltage or clocking slightly lower than what it was set to.
https://youtu.be/KcVwzM-NiVc?t=1732
He clearly says its overclocked.. but I guess it's cooler to just make stuff up.
And they brought up Async Compute as a feature because they just migrated a bunch of their technologies over to utilizing it. They locked the bios presumably because overvolting would damage the card and then people, probably people like you, complain about it and RMA cards for damage that they did. Ah, I rescind my statement about the card not being OCed and it was 2038 hm, my memory is ****. https://youtu.be/L9ZSnI9woWg?t=28m6s that's a proper youtube link btw that one actually works. I was falling asleep at this presentation hahaha. Oh and I think I can speak for anyone about being salty with the OC limits. It was literally impossible without modding the bios because of Vrel or Util. Oh and because of the bios modding I have some weird bios quirks like the card not showing it's real software voltage or clocking slightly lower than what it was set to.
yasamoka
Senior Member
Posts: 4711
Senior Member
Posts: 4711
Posted on: 03/10/2017 12:06 AM
$1200 card is beaten by a $700 card by the same company after 10 months when they had the ability and saw the need to release what they needed to release at the price point they saw would be best for sales. What's so surprising?
People who buy Titans don't need anyone's pity. They knew exactly what they were buying. The fastest GeForce gaming GPU at the time of release for the highest sum of money.
If you have a problem with the Titan's price point, well, don't buy Titans. But don't breathe down the necks of those who do.
I know how much it is, the point it 1200+$ card is bet by 699 card... with years time, it waste money to any one with brain people with money to burn and no brain need not apply cause the reason why card prices keep going cause they know stupid will buy it
$1200 card is beaten by a $700 card by the same company after 10 months when they had the ability and saw the need to release what they needed to release at the price point they saw would be best for sales. What's so surprising?
People who buy Titans don't need anyone's pity. They knew exactly what they were buying. The fastest GeForce gaming GPU at the time of release for the highest sum of money.
If you have a problem with the Titan's price point, well, don't buy Titans. But don't breathe down the necks of those who do.
yasamoka
Senior Member
Posts: 4711
Senior Member
Posts: 4711
Posted on: 03/10/2017 12:16 AM
That's because the framerates at 1080p are often in excess of 144FPS and only two 1080p monitors go beyond 144Hz, to 240Hz, where diminishing returns apply.
To put things in perspective, you would be choosing between a 1080p 240Hz TN panel with not-so-great color quality while you could easily be cruising along with a 1440p 165Hz IPS panel with the best of all worlds, so to speak.
It would also be the case for quite a few titles that even with a very fast CPU, you would not be getting the full potential of this GPU, even if the averages are higher (the minima might still be the same and the maxima might not be higher than the CPU allows).
I don't understand why it says it's not good for 1920x1080 and that anybody playing at that resolution would be cpu limited when every single test in this review with the exception of DOOM clearly shows that even at 1920x1080 the gpu is the limiting factor, not the cpu. There were huge improvements in every game at 1080 over the lower gpu's.
That's because the framerates at 1080p are often in excess of 144FPS and only two 1080p monitors go beyond 144Hz, to 240Hz, where diminishing returns apply.
To put things in perspective, you would be choosing between a 1080p 240Hz TN panel with not-so-great color quality while you could easily be cruising along with a 1440p 165Hz IPS panel with the best of all worlds, so to speak.
It would also be the case for quite a few titles that even with a very fast CPU, you would not be getting the full potential of this GPU, even if the averages are higher (the minima might still be the same and the maxima might not be higher than the CPU allows).
pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 4263
Nice card. It's a shame we have to wait to see how Vega compares.
Is this Nvidia killing the competition before it's even released? We shall see...
Killing the competition would imply any Vega-based GPU comes anywhere close to this price point. But yes, there's a good chance this will still outperform the RX 490/590.