AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review
PowerColor 5700 RED DEVIL review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT ROG STRIX review
ViewSonic Elite XG240R Monitor Review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
X570 Aorus master review
Cooler Master Silencio S600 review
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G review
ASUS RoG Swift PG35VQ Monitor review
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FCAT Frametime Analysis Review
Posted by: on: 03/30/2017 12:04 PM [
5 comment(s) ]
We check out and review the frame-pacing and frametimes with the all new Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, will FCAT reveal some stuff we need to know?
Read article
Advertisement
Noisiv
Senior Member
Posts: 6633
Senior Member
Posts: 6633
Posted on: 03/30/2017 01:36 PM
I wouldn't be worried. These results coming from the game which is barely played, done by a company which, lets be honest here, is deep in bed with AMD. And which cares about NV optimizations so much they couldn't be bothered to get to the bottom of Async state on NV hw for months, instead using the opportunity to dis NV hardware.
When a technology demonstrator aka AoTS, is unable to achieve perfectly smooth gameplay on the most powerful hardware on the planet, I'd say that the issue is with tech. demonstrator, not the hardware. Which wouldn't be any comfort if the game was a huge success and topping the popularity charts. Luckily, its anything BUT that.
The only other game with the issues is Hitman, a long time frame offender.
AotS is still pretty unstable. Some of those graphs are quite interesting.
I wouldn't be worried. These results coming from the game which is barely played, done by a company which, lets be honest here, is deep in bed with AMD. And which cares about NV optimizations so much they couldn't be bothered to get to the bottom of Async state on NV hw for months, instead using the opportunity to dis NV hardware.
When a technology demonstrator aka AoTS, is unable to achieve perfectly smooth gameplay on the most powerful hardware on the planet, I'd say that the issue is with tech. demonstrator, not the hardware. Which wouldn't be any comfort if the game was a huge success and topping the popularity charts. Luckily, its anything BUT that.
The only other game with the issues is Hitman, a long time frame offender.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9271
Senior Member
Posts: 9271
Posted on: 03/30/2017 02:05 PM
I wouldn't be worried. These results coming from the game which is barely played, done by a company which, lets be honest here, is deep in bed with AMD. And which cares about NV optimizations so much they couldn't be bothered to get to the bottom of Async state on NV hw for months, instead using the opportunity to dis NV hardware.
When a technology demonstrator aka AoTS, is unable to achieve perfectly smooth gameplay on the most powerful hardware on the planet, I'd say that the issue is with tech. demonstrator, not the hardware. Which wouldn't be any comfort if the game was a huge success and topping the popularity charts. Luckily, its anything BUT that.
The only other game with the issues is Hitman, a long time frame offender.
Hitman's frame time instability is a feature at this point.
Noticed in RE7 the Fury looks to be running out of VRAM is that game really that much of a hog at WQHD?
I wouldn't be worried. These results coming from the game which is barely played, done by a company which, lets be honest here, is deep in bed with AMD. And which cares about NV optimizations so much they couldn't be bothered to get to the bottom of Async state on NV hw for months, instead using the opportunity to dis NV hardware.
When a technology demonstrator aka AoTS, is unable to achieve perfectly smooth gameplay on the most powerful hardware on the planet, I'd say that the issue is with tech. demonstrator, not the hardware. Which wouldn't be any comfort if the game was a huge success and topping the popularity charts. Luckily, its anything BUT that.
The only other game with the issues is Hitman, a long time frame offender.
Hitman's frame time instability is a feature at this point.
Noticed in RE7 the Fury looks to be running out of VRAM is that game really that much of a hog at WQHD?
Ricepudding
Senior Member
Posts: 487
Senior Member
Posts: 487
Posted on: 03/30/2017 02:59 PM
Question to anyone who happens to know, is there a reason why AMD cards frame-times are often worse and have a higher latency than Nvidia?
Is it due to lack of optimisation or less power in the card or just architecture of the cards?
Question to anyone who happens to know, is there a reason why AMD cards frame-times are often worse and have a higher latency than Nvidia?
Is it due to lack of optimisation or less power in the card or just architecture of the cards?
kakiharaFRS
Senior Member
Posts: 118
Senior Member
Posts: 118
Posted on: 03/30/2017 05:34 PM
Question to anyone who happens to know, is there a reason why AMD cards frame-times are often worse and have a higher latency than Nvidia?
Is it due to lack of optimisation or less power in the card or just architecture of the cards?
newbie answer but I "think" that it's because they have older hardware, the older nvidias also had artifacts like that from what I remember and they weren't tested in 1440 or 4k like now it's bound to make things worse
thanks for the article Hilbert I have been playing for years with an Asus 120Hz VG278 with lightboost hack (a black frame insertion that works better than any of the models that have it standard, I know I ordered and returned them all :/ )
because of that near-perfect zero motion blur I can easily notice stuttering and weirdness but didn't understand why my 100+fps looked like a diaporama with obvious picture jumps before you and digital foundry started doing FCAT graphs so thx for them really useful to me,
especially now that I'm looking at VR and want a super smooth framerate
Question to anyone who happens to know, is there a reason why AMD cards frame-times are often worse and have a higher latency than Nvidia?
Is it due to lack of optimisation or less power in the card or just architecture of the cards?
newbie answer but I "think" that it's because they have older hardware, the older nvidias also had artifacts like that from what I remember and they weren't tested in 1440 or 4k like now it's bound to make things worse
thanks for the article Hilbert I have been playing for years with an Asus 120Hz VG278 with lightboost hack (a black frame insertion that works better than any of the models that have it standard, I know I ordered and returned them all :/ )
because of that near-perfect zero motion blur I can easily notice stuttering and weirdness but didn't understand why my 100+fps looked like a diaporama with obvious picture jumps before you and digital foundry started doing FCAT graphs so thx for them really useful to me,
especially now that I'm looking at VR and want a super smooth framerate
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9484
AotS is still pretty unstable. Some of those graphs are quite interesting.