Radeon Series RX 6800 (XT) and 6900 XT preview & analysis
ASUS TUF LC240 RGB LCS review
GeForce RTX 3070 Founder edition review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - October 2020
Corsair 4000D PC Chassis Review
TeamGroup EX2 SSD 1TB review
Deepcool AS500 air cooler review
Leven JS600 1 TB SATA3 SSD review
ClockTuner for Ryzen v1.1 (CTR) Guide by 1USMUS
Colorful GeForce RTX 3080 iGAME VULCAN review
GALAX HOF Pro PCIe 4.0 NVMe review
Posted by: on: 01/27/2020 09:44 AM [
16 comment(s) ]
Fast, faster fastest? We review the GALAX HOF 1TB PCIe Gen 4.0 SSD. It reaches the fastest transfer rates we have seen thus far at 5 GB/sec. Of course, it is an SSD you can seat into any PCIe 3.0 compatible PC, however, if you place it into a Ryzen 3000 / X570 based PC, some magic happens as you are running 4000 to 5000 MB/s numbers and higher, thanks to the new PCIe 4.0 interface and a little TLC from Phison, well Toshiba strictly speaking.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
galax
pages 1 2 3 4
Mda400
Senior Member
Posts: 843
Senior Member
Posts: 843
Posted on: 01/27/2020 02:32 PM
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
Storage device manufacturers in year 3000 will still be saying a GB is 1000 MB. hahaha 
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
tunejunky
Senior Member
Posts: 1033
Senior Member
Posts: 1033
Posted on: 01/27/2020 02:58 PM
another great review HH.
i feel like a Ferengi learning the rules of acquisition, cuz i'm a greedy lil' pup who likes shiny.
another great review HH.
i feel like a Ferengi learning the rules of acquisition, cuz i'm a greedy lil' pup who likes shiny.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 10884
Senior Member
Posts: 10884
Posted on: 01/27/2020 03:43 PM
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
Please don't.
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
Please don't.
Kool64
Senior Member
Posts: 838
Senior Member
Posts: 838
Posted on: 01/27/2020 04:15 PM
It looks pretty cool but given my primary M.2 slot is buried squarely under my video card I'd be hard pressed to wonder if they charged extra for the white PCB and "fancy" heat sink.
It looks pretty cool but given my primary M.2 slot is buried squarely under my video card I'd be hard pressed to wonder if they charged extra for the white PCB and "fancy" heat sink.
pages 1 2 3 4
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1191
Same 4k random read @qd=1 performance as samsung Sm951 nvme released in 2015.
Looks like there is no need to upgrade for a bit higher seq read and write yet
.