Asrock B550 PG Riptide review
be quiet! Dark Rock TF2 review
Basemark GPU v1.2 benchmarks with 36 GPUs
Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
GALAX HOF Pro PCIe 4.0 NVMe review
Posted by: on: 01/27/2020 10:44 AM [
15 comment(s) ]
Fast, faster fastest? We review the GALAX HOF 1TB PCIe Gen 4.0 SSD. It reaches the fastest transfer rates we have seen thus far at 5 GB/sec. Of course, it is an SSD you can seat into any PCIe 3.0 compatible PC, however, if you place it into a Ryzen 3000 / X570 based PC, some magic happens as you are running 4000 to 5000 MB/s numbers and higher, thanks to the new PCIe 4.0 interface and a little TLC from Phison, well Toshiba strictly speaking.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
galax
pages 1 2 3
Mda400
Senior Member
Posts: 966
Senior Member
Posts: 966
Posted on: 01/27/2020 03:32 PM
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
Storage device manufacturers in year 3000 will still be saying a GB is 1000 MB. hahaha 
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
tunejunky
Senior Member
Posts: 1570
Senior Member
Posts: 1570
Posted on: 01/27/2020 03:58 PM
another great review HH.
i feel like a Ferengi learning the rules of acquisition, cuz i'm a greedy lil' pup who likes shiny.
another great review HH.
i feel like a Ferengi learning the rules of acquisition, cuz i'm a greedy lil' pup who likes shiny.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Posted on: 01/27/2020 04:43 PM
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
Please don't.
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
Please don't.
Kool64
Senior Member
Posts: 1115
Senior Member
Posts: 1115
Posted on: 01/27/2020 05:15 PM
It looks pretty cool but given my primary M.2 slot is buried squarely under my video card I'd be hard pressed to wonder if they charged extra for the white PCB and "fancy" heat sink.
It looks pretty cool but given my primary M.2 slot is buried squarely under my video card I'd be hard pressed to wonder if they charged extra for the white PCB and "fancy" heat sink.
pages 1 2 3
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1500
Same 4k random read @qd=1 performance as samsung Sm951 nvme released in 2015.
Looks like there is no need to upgrade for a bit higher seq read and write yet
.