Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
Final Fantasy XV PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 02/28/2018 06:17 PM [
45 comment(s) ]
We check out and benchmark the PC version of Final Fantasy XV / 15 (2018) for Windows relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
Final Fantasy XV PC benchmarks,
pages « 2 3 4 5 > »
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 46386
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 46386
Posted on: 02/28/2018 07:41 PM
Legend added, thanks for reporting.
Hilbert, theres some missing info in the chart on p8. I presume the processor core scaling chart colored bars are for resolutions. Its not mentioned so can be confusing.
Legend added, thanks for reporting.
Nomsky
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Posted on: 02/28/2018 07:43 PM
To say that Adrenalin 18.2.3 officially supports FFXV is an outright fallacy. AMD shall release an optimized driver upon the game's official release, rendering this article redundant.
To say that Adrenalin 18.2.3 officially supports FFXV is an outright fallacy. AMD shall release an optimized driver upon the game's official release, rendering this article redundant.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 46386
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 46386
Posted on: 02/28/2018 07:57 PM
If they do, we'll update the article with the new driver set and see if it makes a difference. Would be good if they do.
To say that Adrenalin 18.2.3 officially supports FFXV is an outright fallacy. AMD shall release an optimized driver upon the game's official release, rendering this article redundant.
If they do, we'll update the article with the new driver set and see if it makes a difference. Would be good if they do.
Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 4122
Senior Member
Posts: 4122
Posted on: 02/28/2018 08:45 PM
It did the same for me. I tried it on 960 EVO, 512 GB Sandisk, and 3TB 115mb read.
I had benchmark on fast SSD and demo on normal HDD and it ran the same, slight streaming stutter time to time when running across the map.
It did the same for me. I tried it on 960 EVO, 512 GB Sandisk, and 3TB 115mb read.
pages « 2 3 4 5 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 8366
Imo the 980 Ti does 'weird' in the results. Only slightly above 980 and notably behind 1070.
Either the game is better optimized for Pascal (if that's even possible) or highest preset would need more VRAM maybe?
Note how 8 GB cards have 6+ GB usage even at FullHD.
If that was simply due to filling available VRAM then the usage should be closer to 8 GB perhaps.
1070 and above have 8 GB VRAM.