EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review
Corsair HS70 Bluetooth Headset Review
MSI MEG X570 Unify review
Scythe Ninja 5 air cooler review
Final Fantasy XV PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 02/28/2018 05:17 PM [
45 comment(s) ]
We check out and benchmark the PC version of Final Fantasy XV / 15 (2018) for Windows relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
Final Fantasy XV PC benchmarks,
pages « 2 3 4 5 > »
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 39953
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 39953
Posted on: 02/28/2018 06:41 PM
Legend added, thanks for reporting.
Hilbert, theres some missing info in the chart on p8. I presume the processor core scaling chart colored bars are for resolutions. Its not mentioned so can be confusing.
Legend added, thanks for reporting.
Nomsky
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Posted on: 02/28/2018 06:43 PM
To say that Adrenalin 18.2.3 officially supports FFXV is an outright fallacy. AMD shall release an optimized driver upon the game's official release, rendering this article redundant.
To say that Adrenalin 18.2.3 officially supports FFXV is an outright fallacy. AMD shall release an optimized driver upon the game's official release, rendering this article redundant.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 39953
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 39953
Posted on: 02/28/2018 06:57 PM
If they do, we'll update the article with the new driver set and see if it makes a difference. Would be good if they do.
To say that Adrenalin 18.2.3 officially supports FFXV is an outright fallacy. AMD shall release an optimized driver upon the game's official release, rendering this article redundant.
If they do, we'll update the article with the new driver set and see if it makes a difference. Would be good if they do.
Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 2986
Senior Member
Posts: 2986
Posted on: 02/28/2018 07:45 PM
It did the same for me. I tried it on 960 EVO, 512 GB Sandisk, and 3TB 115mb read.
I had benchmark on fast SSD and demo on normal HDD and it ran the same, slight streaming stutter time to time when running across the map.
It did the same for me. I tried it on 960 EVO, 512 GB Sandisk, and 3TB 115mb read.
pages « 2 3 4 5 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6762
Imo the 980 Ti does 'weird' in the results. Only slightly above 980 and notably behind 1070.
Either the game is better optimized for Pascal (if that's even possible) or highest preset would need more VRAM maybe?
Note how 8 GB cards have 6+ GB usage even at FullHD.
If that was simply due to filling available VRAM then the usage should be closer to 8 GB perhaps.
1070 and above have 8 GB VRAM.