MSI Vigor GK71 Sonic keyboard review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Suprim X 12GB review
TeamGroup A440 PRO Special 5eries 4TB NVMe review
Core i5 12400 processor review
MSI MAG B660M Mortar WIFI review
Biostar Z690 Valkyrie review
TeamGroup A440 PRO PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
DDR5 scaling with G.Skill TridentZ5 6000 CL36 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3070 Noctua OC review
G.Skill Z5i (Mini ITX) chassis review
Far Cry Primal: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 03/01/2016 03:34 PM [
55 comment(s) ]
We take a look at Far Cry Primal in our usual in-depth ways. That would be tested on the PC gaming wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
ubisoft
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 12666
Senior Member
Posts: 12666
Posted on: 03/01/2016 04:03 PM
Great review so far again HH! Even the latest Nvidia driver's already used, nice
Great review so far again HH! Even the latest Nvidia driver's already used, nice
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 17213
Senior Member
Posts: 17213
Posted on: 03/01/2016 04:08 PM
Another good review HH. Im glad you are still including Tahiti GPU in your charts. Its still performing nicely.
AMD and nVidia seems to do well in FC. Isnt that bad performing as reported early.
Another good review HH. Im glad you are still including Tahiti GPU in your charts. Its still performing nicely.
AMD and nVidia seems to do well in FC. Isnt that bad performing as reported early.
dr_rus
Senior Member
Posts: 3178
Senior Member
Posts: 3178
Posted on: 03/01/2016 04:18 PM
Another good review HH. Im glad you are still including Tahiti GPU in your charts. Its still performing nicely.
AMD and nVidia seems to do well in FC. Isnt that bad performing as reported early.
Eh, not really true for NV. Latest Dunia engine iterations (FC4 and Primal) definitely favor GCN cards for some reason as can be seen from 290X outperforming GTX980 -- which isn't something which happens regularly.
Another good review HH. Im glad you are still including Tahiti GPU in your charts. Its still performing nicely.
AMD and nVidia seems to do well in FC. Isnt that bad performing as reported early.
Eh, not really true for NV. Latest Dunia engine iterations (FC4 and Primal) definitely favor GCN cards for some reason as can be seen from 290X outperforming GTX980 -- which isn't something which happens regularly.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 17213
Senior Member
Posts: 17213
Posted on: 03/01/2016 04:42 PM
Doom alpha, Division beta, Hitman beta this also can be seen. 290X/390X outperforming GTX980 while 290 outperforming GTX970. Look at the 780ti, its left behind so much and no one cares about it.
To be honest all those trends i mention above started to happen regularly.
Eh, not really true for NV. Latest Dunia engine iterations (FC4 and Primal) definitely favor GCN cards for some reason as can be seen from 290X outperforming GTX980 -- which isn't something which happens regularly.
Doom alpha, Division beta, Hitman beta this also can be seen. 290X/390X outperforming GTX980 while 290 outperforming GTX970. Look at the 780ti, its left behind so much and no one cares about it.
To be honest all those trends i mention above started to happen regularly.
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 142
Fury X is onboard, great results for each brand, hopping to see maybe a dx12 patch.