Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review
MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT GAMING X TRIO review
Guru3D Q1 Winter 20/21 PC Buyer Guide
AOC CU34G2X monitor review
Silicon Power UD70 PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSD review
Patriot Viper Steel RGB 3600 MHz (2x 16GB) review
ClockTuner 2.0 for Ryzen (CTR) Guide
Silicon Power US70 PCIe 4.0 NVMe review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - January 2021
Far Cry Primal: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 03/01/2016 02:34 PM [
55 comment(s) ]
We take a look at Far Cry Primal in our usual in-depth ways. That would be tested on the PC gaming wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
ubisoft
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 3038
Senior Member
Posts: 3038
Posted on: 03/01/2016 05:23 PM
But then there's the chance Nvidia can whip up some driver magic like they usually do.Unless the DX12 API makes that notion null and void but I doubt it.It's the usual trend with new APIs and Tech, AMD would come blazing through the gates, everyone focusing on them and how late Nvidia is.When Nvidia's ready, AMD gets sidelined due to unrivaled driver optimization and power consumption.
I really hope I'm wrong for AMD's sake because they're not looking good as a company right now.Wouldn't wish their employees out of work, not in this economy.
Same thing happened in 2010 with fermi launch.
GTX 480 was faster but was 6 months newer as well.
I remember seeing so many fanboys saying AMD is slow haha cant beat the gtx 480 blah blah.
Im just glad to see AMD and Nvidia close in performance.
We cant ever goo back too 2007 again. That time sucked for Radeon.
While I had an 8800gts 512, when the HD 4870 launched, I was very happy to see it.
I just hope it doesnt take months to get a proper Xfire profile.
Since its very close to FC4.
But then there's the chance Nvidia can whip up some driver magic like they usually do.Unless the DX12 API makes that notion null and void but I doubt it.It's the usual trend with new APIs and Tech, AMD would come blazing through the gates, everyone focusing on them and how late Nvidia is.When Nvidia's ready, AMD gets sidelined due to unrivaled driver optimization and power consumption.
I really hope I'm wrong for AMD's sake because they're not looking good as a company right now.Wouldn't wish their employees out of work, not in this economy.
Same thing happened in 2010 with fermi launch.
GTX 480 was faster but was 6 months newer as well.
I remember seeing so many fanboys saying AMD is slow haha cant beat the gtx 480 blah blah.
Im just glad to see AMD and Nvidia close in performance.
We cant ever goo back too 2007 again. That time sucked for Radeon.
While I had an 8800gts 512, when the HD 4870 launched, I was very happy to see it.
I just hope it doesnt take months to get a proper Xfire profile.
Since its very close to FC4.
Dragondale13
Senior Member
Posts: 1454
Senior Member
Posts: 1454
Posted on: 03/01/2016 05:45 PM
Same thing happened in 2010 with fermi launch.
GTX 480 was faster but was 6 months newer as well.
I remember seeing so many fanboys saying AMD is slow haha cant beat the gtx 480 blah blah.
Im just glad to see AMD and Nvidia close in performance.
We cant ever goo back too 2007 again. That time sucked for Radeon.
While I had an 8800gts 512, when the HD 4870 launched, I was very happy to see it.
I just hope it doesnt take months to get a proper Xfire profile.
Since its very close to FC4.
That's a trend I'm hoping AMD can nail down and be on par with Nvidia for once.As for power consumption, I consider it a non-issue as frame limiting is an easy cure.But like you said, it really is a good feeling to see Radeons back up there and have the two slug it out.
Same thing happened in 2010 with fermi launch.
GTX 480 was faster but was 6 months newer as well.
I remember seeing so many fanboys saying AMD is slow haha cant beat the gtx 480 blah blah.
Im just glad to see AMD and Nvidia close in performance.
We cant ever goo back too 2007 again. That time sucked for Radeon.
While I had an 8800gts 512, when the HD 4870 launched, I was very happy to see it.
I just hope it doesnt take months to get a proper Xfire profile.
Since its very close to FC4.
That's a trend I'm hoping AMD can nail down and be on par with Nvidia for once.As for power consumption, I consider it a non-issue as frame limiting is an easy cure.But like you said, it really is a good feeling to see Radeons back up there and have the two slug it out.
Agonist
Senior Member
Posts: 3038
Senior Member
Posts: 3038
Posted on: 03/01/2016 06:19 PM
Fully agreed on power consumption.
I limit BF4 to 80 fps. Keeps my cards under 70c load.
Im not worried about power comsumption.
If I was Id have 2 gtx 960 or R9 285s.
I have no preference over nvidia or amd except for business models.
I prefer AMD there. Hardware wise, its about the same for both.
I do love seeing that 280x is 9 frames from the 780ti. Thats impressive.
This game does look like its runs well though for both sides.
I wanna try it on all 3 of my rigs.
290x xfire in one,
R9 280 in 2nd and
GTX 670 4gb in the 3rd.
That's a trend I'm hoping AMD can nail down and be on par with Nvidia for once.As for power consumption, I consider it a non-issue as frame limiting is an easy cure.But like you said, it really is a good feeling to see Radeons back up there and have the two slug it out.
Fully agreed on power consumption.
I limit BF4 to 80 fps. Keeps my cards under 70c load.
Im not worried about power comsumption.
If I was Id have 2 gtx 960 or R9 285s.
I have no preference over nvidia or amd except for business models.
I prefer AMD there. Hardware wise, its about the same for both.
I do love seeing that 280x is 9 frames from the 780ti. Thats impressive.
This game does look like its runs well though for both sides.
I wanna try it on all 3 of my rigs.
290x xfire in one,
R9 280 in 2nd and
GTX 670 4gb in the 3rd.
Koniakki
Senior Member
Posts: 2843
Senior Member
Posts: 2843
Posted on: 03/01/2016 06:30 PM
Was eagerly waiting for this perf review. Great work as usual Boss!
Was eagerly waiting for this perf review. Great work as usual Boss!
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1454
Doom alpha, Division beta, Hitman beta this also can be seen. 290X/390X outperforming GTX980 while 290 outperforming GTX970. Look at the 780ti, its left behind so much and no one cares about it.
To be honest all those trends i mention above started to happen regularly.
But then there's the chance Nvidia can whip up some driver magic like they usually do.Unless the DX12 API makes that notion null and void but I doubt it.It's the usual trend with new APIs and Tech, AMD would come blazing through the gates, everyone focusing on them and how late Nvidia is.When Nvidia's ready, AMD gets sidelined due to unrivaled driver optimization and power consumption.
I really hope I'm wrong for AMD's sake because they're not looking good as a company right now.Wouldn't wish their employees out of work, not in this economy.