Crucial P1 M.2 1000GB SSD Review
Corsair Force Series MP510 M.2 SSD Review
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 Armor 8G review
ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2070 8GB review
Guru3D PC Buyers Guide Autumn 2018
TeamGroup MP32 M2 NVMe 480GB SSD Review
Terra Master F4-220 4 bay NAS review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING OC 11G review
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: PC graphics benchmark review
Seagate Fast SSD 1TB review
Far Cry 5 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 03/26/2018 12:25 PM [
139 comment(s) ]
We check out and benchmark the PC version of Far Cry 5 (2018) for Windows relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
Far Cry 5 PC benchmarks,
pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 33500
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 33500
Posted on: 03/26/2018 12:21 PM
Background mountains, vegetation, shadows, but also things like water shows that really well. I'll try and see if I can update the screenshots today with a better batch (environment) showing the differences.
Still I have to find any major detail improvement with ultra over low on those screenshots... I guess it will only be lighting and voluminetric stuff?
Background mountains, vegetation, shadows, but also things like water shows that really well. I'll try and see if I can update the screenshots today with a better batch (environment) showing the differences.
insp1re2600
Senior Member
Posts: 367
Senior Member
Posts: 367
Posted on: 03/26/2018 12:32 PM
looking forward to this, glad it seems to be optimised well on day 1
looking forward to this, glad it seems to be optimised well on day 1
rl66
Senior Member
Posts: 1738
Senior Member
Posts: 1738
Posted on: 03/26/2018 12:33 PM
Have you noticed that the AMD Fury line perform quite good, despite they were performing not so good at launch.
Fun isn't it?
Have you noticed that the AMD Fury line perform quite good, despite they were performing not so good at launch.
Fun isn't it?
Perjantai
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Posted on: 03/26/2018 12:34 PM
There is no way to disable Rapid Packed Math? I would like to see how much it improves over normal.
There is no way to disable Rapid Packed Math? I would like to see how much it improves over normal.
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 9087
Senior Member
Posts: 9087
Posted on: 03/26/2018 12:43 PM
Oh you are right, I just looked at the water now and it does look better. Thanks for pointing it out but you already did a good job in all the testing, probably soon you can find comparison screenshots for all the settings on the net too if one (I) wants to check.
Background mountains, vegetation, shadows, but also things like water shows that really well. I'll try and see if I can update the screenshots today with a better batch (environment) showing the differences.
Oh you are right, I just looked at the water now and it does look better. Thanks for pointing it out but you already did a good job in all the testing, probably soon you can find comparison screenshots for all the settings on the net too if one (I) wants to check.
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 775
Senior Member
Posts: 775
Posted on: 03/26/2018 12:44 PM
Nice The Exclusieve Vega features works great, but only a big gap on 1440P
Nice The Exclusieve Vega features works great, but only a big gap on 1440P
Perjantai
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Posted on: 03/26/2018 12:51 PM
Ubisoft should team up with Amd more often.. Their gamework implementations are often bad. I just playd FC4 and I had to disable all gameworks effects to make it not crash every 30mins.
Ubisoft should team up with Amd more often.. Their gamework implementations are often bad. I just playd FC4 and I had to disable all gameworks effects to make it not crash every 30mins.
kondziowy
Member
Posts: 55
Member
Posts: 55
Posted on: 03/26/2018 12:54 PM
Yet another AMD sponsored title that runs SMOOTH on everything and is not gimping anyone with gimpworks, and looks great while doing that on DAY ONE.
Yet another AMD sponsored title that runs SMOOTH on everything and is not gimping anyone with gimpworks, and looks great while doing that on DAY ONE.
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 775
Senior Member
Posts: 775
Posted on: 03/26/2018 12:59 PM
This game have also Nvidia turf effect for vegetation
Ubisoft should team up with Amd more often.. Their gamework implementations are often bad. I just playd FC4 and I had to disable all gameworks effects to make it not crash every 30mins.
This game have also Nvidia turf effect for vegetation
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 1237
Senior Member
Posts: 1237
Posted on: 03/26/2018 01:12 PM
Ubisoft: "You have already gamed quite enough today, friend. For the sake of your health, let's wait 24 hours before continuing, mmkay?"
That was the reason, right?
Ubisoft: "You have already gamed quite enough today, friend. For the sake of your health, let's wait 24 hours before continuing, mmkay?"
That was the reason, right?
zero_cool
Member
Posts: 41
Member
Posts: 41
Posted on: 03/26/2018 01:27 PM
great performance with no specific driver.. it will get much better with game ready driversd
great performance with no specific driver.. it will get much better with game ready driversd
Hughesy
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Posted on: 03/26/2018 01:32 PM
I bought the PS4 version as for whatever reason the PC version doesn't support HDR. It's great that the PC version runs well though.
I bought the PS4 version as for whatever reason the PC version doesn't support HDR. It's great that the PC version runs well though.
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 775
Senior Member
Posts: 775
Posted on: 03/26/2018 01:54 PM
HDR pops out if you turn Windows HDR on?
HDR pops out if you turn Windows HDR on?
signex
Senior Member
Posts: 8499
Senior Member
Posts: 8499
Posted on: 03/26/2018 02:16 PM
Wow the performance is unreal, thank you ubisoft!!!!
Can't believe the Fury X is still that good, i made a good purchase afterall.
Wow the performance is unreal, thank you ubisoft!!!!
Can't believe the Fury X is still that good, i made a good purchase afterall.
Spets
Senior Member
Posts: 2965
Senior Member
Posts: 2965
Posted on: 03/26/2018 02:20 PM
Ultra settings still looks like a ps4 game :/
Might be different when I'm playing it but it looks like a step backwards from GR:Wildlands.
Performance looks good, thanks for the review HH.
Ultra settings still looks like a ps4 game :/
Might be different when I'm playing it but it looks like a step backwards from GR:Wildlands.
Performance looks good, thanks for the review HH.
JonasBeckman
Senior Member
Posts: 14567
Senior Member
Posts: 14567
Posted on: 03/26/2018 02:23 PM
Ultra settings still looks like a ps4 game :/
Might be different when I'm playing it but it looks like a step backwards from GR:Wildlands.
Performance looks good, thanks for the review HH.
Different engine, Dunia compared to Anvil which you then have Anvil Next in Wildlands compared to the new version in Origins and it looks pretty dated digging into the engine internals although Origins lacks the additional graphical effects offered by GameWorks for users who have enough GPU power to enable these.
They did a pretty thorough overhaul for Far Cry 4 though and then a smaller one for Primal and now here's Far Cry 5 with physically accurate materials and a fancy water system though I assume pop-in for vegetation and LOD might still be a thing, unsure how the shadow system is though it appears to be a variant on PCSS for smooth shadows and filtering if that info was accurate.
Ultra settings still looks like a ps4 game :/
Might be different when I'm playing it but it looks like a step backwards from GR:Wildlands.
Performance looks good, thanks for the review HH.
Different engine, Dunia compared to Anvil which you then have Anvil Next in Wildlands compared to the new version in Origins and it looks pretty dated digging into the engine internals although Origins lacks the additional graphical effects offered by GameWorks for users who have enough GPU power to enable these.
They did a pretty thorough overhaul for Far Cry 4 though and then a smaller one for Primal and now here's Far Cry 5 with physically accurate materials and a fancy water system though I assume pop-in for vegetation and LOD might still be a thing, unsure how the shadow system is though it appears to be a variant on PCSS for smooth shadows and filtering if that info was accurate.
Prince Valiant
Senior Member
Posts: 630
Senior Member
Posts: 630
Posted on: 03/26/2018 02:25 PM
Strange to see 4C/4T doing a little better than 4C/8T.
Strange to see 4C/4T doing a little better than 4C/8T.
Hughesy
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Senior Member
Posts: 357
Posted on: 03/26/2018 02:44 PM
Games need to support HDR in the first place, turning it on in Windows will do nothing if the game doesn't support it. As far as I know the PC version doesn't support it, but the console version does.
HDR pops out if you turn Windows HDR on?
Games need to support HDR in the first place, turning it on in Windows will do nothing if the game doesn't support it. As far as I know the PC version doesn't support it, but the console version does.
pharma
Senior Member
Posts: 858
Senior Member
Posts: 858
Posted on: 03/26/2018 02:53 PM
Strange seeing a GTX 1080Ti is recommended to play at 3840x2160 when based on the results a GTX 1080 seems sufficient.
Strange seeing a GTX 1080Ti is recommended to play at 3840x2160 when based on the results a GTX 1080 seems sufficient.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 33500
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 33500
Posted on: 03/26/2018 02:53 PM
For those interested, I have just added some Ryzen CPU results.
For those interested, I have just added some Ryzen CPU results.
Dimitrios1983
Senior Member
Posts: 103
Senior Member
Posts: 103
Posted on: 03/26/2018 03:12 PM
Do you need a CPU that has SSE4.1 or 4.2 or whatever old CPU's lack? Have a Phenom 965BE running around 4.0GHZ and no issues on most games.
Do you need a CPU that has SSE4.1 or 4.2 or whatever old CPU's lack? Have a Phenom 965BE running around 4.0GHZ and no issues on most games.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9017
Senior Member
Posts: 9017
Posted on: 03/26/2018 03:18 PM
Vega doing great in this title Nvidia will likely get a little faster with a driver update or two but overall performance is great out of the box. It's nice to see lower end cards like the RX460, 1050 and 1050ti handle ultra 1080p that good. Set the game to mostly high settings and go a little light on AA and even budget PC's will have great IQ.
Vega doing great in this title Nvidia will likely get a little faster with a driver update or two but overall performance is great out of the box. It's nice to see lower end cards like the RX460, 1050 and 1050ti handle ultra 1080p that good. Set the game to mostly high settings and go a little light on AA and even budget PC's will have great IQ.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 33500
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 33500
Posted on: 03/26/2018 03:24 PM
I have added another set of screenshots, showcasing image quality, all downloadable in uncompressed quality.
Oh you are right, I just looked at the water now and it does look better. Thanks for pointing it out but you already did a good job in all the testing, probably soon you can find comparison screenshots for all the settings on the net too if one (I) wants to check.
I have added another set of screenshots, showcasing image quality, all downloadable in uncompressed quality.
allesclar
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 5565
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 5565
Posted on: 03/26/2018 04:05 PM
Thanks for the write up Hilbert.
This game has gone on the list to buy me thinks
Thanks for the write up Hilbert.
This game has gone on the list to buy me thinks
pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9087
Still I have to find any major detail improvement with ultra over low on those screenshots... I guess it will only be lighting and voluminetric stuff?