Ballistix Elite 3600 MHz 16GB Dual Channel DDR4 review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC2900 Gaming Router review
Asustor Nimbustor 4 (AS5304T) NAS Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
be quiet! Dark Rock SLIM review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming OC review
Edifier G4 Pro Headset review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Cooler Master SK621 Compact keyboard review
AMD Athlon 220GE and 240GE review
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW2 review
Posted by: on: 04/28/2017 08:41 AM [
13 comment(s) ]
We check out the EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW2 iCX 8G, and heck yeah this is not your regular one. Meet the all custom, cooled and tweaked EVGA "For-The-Win2" Edition. This SKU is a more premium version that comes with some new features, e.g. read sensors everywhere. We'll heck out the 8 GB product fitted with a nice and impressive two slot cooler, some extra LED functionality and a product that comes with some sexy out of the box clock frequencies.
Read article
Advertisement
mahanddeem
Senior Member
Posts: 642
Senior Member
Posts: 642
Posted on: 04/29/2017 08:42 AM
A question here:
Why every Guru3d GTX1080 review I see BF1 DX12 1080p FPS average is 145-148fps.
In my PC in BF1 my average is always 121-127fps (min 100 and 144fps capped max) DX12 1080p Ultra preset (CPU usage 50% to 75% max and GPU is always 95%-99%). That's multiplayer 64 player conquest servers with ping of 10ms.
A question here:
Why every Guru3d GTX1080 review I see BF1 DX12 1080p FPS average is 145-148fps.
In my PC in BF1 my average is always 121-127fps (min 100 and 144fps capped max) DX12 1080p Ultra preset (CPU usage 50% to 75% max and GPU is always 95%-99%). That's multiplayer 64 player conquest servers with ping of 10ms.
Lucifer
Senior Member
Posts: 201
Senior Member
Posts: 201
Posted on: 04/29/2017 11:03 AM
nice review HH, I hope the product innard page would be mandatory for all upcoming gpu review. It helps alot in making decisions in order to buy gpus or not.
nice review HH, I hope the product innard page would be mandatory for all upcoming gpu review. It helps alot in making decisions in order to buy gpus or not.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35063
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35063
Posted on: 04/29/2017 11:08 AM
A question here:
Why every Guru3d GTX1080 review I see BF1 DX12 1080p FPS average is 145-148fps.
In my PC in BF1 my average is always 121-127fps (min 100 and 144fps capped max) DX12 1080p Ultra preset (CPU usage 50% to 75% max and GPU is always 95%-99%). That's multiplayer 64 player conquest servers with ping of 10ms.
You basically answered your own question. You're on a 64 player Multi-player where I test in single player. Also I am on 8-cores + quad-channel memory and you on 4 + dual-channel, I assume with MP that does matter. Last but not least, FPS isn't a constant throughout the game. The actual scene can differ in scenery and thus FPS.
A question here:
Why every Guru3d GTX1080 review I see BF1 DX12 1080p FPS average is 145-148fps.
In my PC in BF1 my average is always 121-127fps (min 100 and 144fps capped max) DX12 1080p Ultra preset (CPU usage 50% to 75% max and GPU is always 95%-99%). That's multiplayer 64 player conquest servers with ping of 10ms.
You basically answered your own question. You're on a 64 player Multi-player where I test in single player. Also I am on 8-cores + quad-channel memory and you on 4 + dual-channel, I assume with MP that does matter. Last but not least, FPS isn't a constant throughout the game. The actual scene can differ in scenery and thus FPS.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35063
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35063
Posted on: 04/29/2017 11:09 AM
I'm still playing with that thought whether or not it is worth the hassle as yes, I did manage to kill a 1080 Ti recently.
nice review HH, I hope the product innard page would be mandatory for all upcoming gpu review. It helps alot in making decisions in order to buy gpus or not.
I'm still playing with that thought whether or not it is worth the hassle as yes, I did manage to kill a 1080 Ti recently.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35063
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35063
Posted on: 04/29/2017 11:10 AM
We're progressing and trying to move forward from the differences we had. At one point you need to move on.
Hmm when did evga stop boycotting guru3d? rarely see evga reviews last few years
We're progressing and trying to move forward from the differences we had. At one point you need to move on.
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Posted on: 04/29/2017 06:03 PM
How did that happen?
When you break a review sample do you have to return the broken sample or do you pay out of pocket the value of it?
I'm still playing with that thought whether or not it is worth the hassle as yes, I did manage to kill a 1080 Ti recently.
How did that happen?
When you break a review sample do you have to return the broken sample or do you pay out of pocket the value of it?
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9250
Senior Member
Posts: 9250
Posted on: 04/29/2017 06:35 PM
that would be great I would love to see alot more evga reviews, seeing ever gpu I bought since series 6 have been evga
I would like to know what you did to it!
We're progressing and trying to move forward from the differences we had. At one point you need to move on.
that would be great I would love to see alot more evga reviews, seeing ever gpu I bought since series 6 have been evga
I'm still playing with that thought whether or not it is worth the hassle as yes, I did manage to kill a 1080 Ti recently.
I would like to know what you did to it!
airbud7
Senior Member
Posts: 6766
Senior Member
Posts: 6766
Posted on: 04/29/2017 06:43 PM
oh dear...I think I just shed a tear........
I did manage to kill a 1080 Ti recently.
oh dear...I think I just shed a tear........
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35063
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35063
Posted on: 04/29/2017 06:49 PM
Yeah that's why I disassemble them AFTER I finished testing them
One of the cards had really sticky gluey thermal-pads in-between the heatsink block and vrm/memory etc. I had to use a bit of force to wiggle it loose. At first I figured nothing went wrong, but it likely got a micro-fracture.
That moment when you power up the PC and the screen stays black. Priceless
The AIB was cool about it though, no worries.
Yeah that's why I disassemble them AFTER I finished testing them
One of the cards had really sticky gluey thermal-pads in-between the heatsink block and vrm/memory etc. I had to use a bit of force to wiggle it loose. At first I figured nothing went wrong, but it likely got a micro-fracture.
That moment when you power up the PC and the screen stays black. Priceless
The AIB was cool about it though, no worries.
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9250
Senior Member
Posts: 9250
Posted on: 04/29/2017 07:14 PM
^
I remember that happen few of gpu my BFG cards come to mind
^
I remember that happen few of gpu my BFG cards come to mind
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 871
Senior Member
Posts: 871
Posted on: 04/30/2017 07:06 AM
Hilbert u could try baking the card if u really have to that sometimes fixes micro cracks.
Hilbert u could try baking the card if u really have to that sometimes fixes micro cracks.
mahanddeem
Senior Member
Posts: 642
Senior Member
Posts: 642
Posted on: 04/30/2017 08:25 AM
I fully understand the fact that fps is different depending where you are in game and also on what is going on at the moment like explosions, heavy smoke, too many players around, vehicles (kind of...duh!!!) but I also pointed out that even with my (fast) quad core CPU (not 8+) and dual memory channels(not quad) I am still GPU bound (proof is GPU usage of 95%-99%).
But I get the point. You simply test at single player. There is no way around that (multiplayer is difficult to bench), but at the same time it throws the validity and reliability of the test away. Most BF players have got the game for multiplayer mode.
You basically answered your own question. You're on a 64 player Multi-player where I test in single player. Also I am on 8-cores + quad-channel memory and you on 4 + dual-channel, I assume with MP that does matter. Last but not least, FPS isn't a constant throughout the game. The actual scene can differ in scenery and thus FPS.
I fully understand the fact that fps is different depending where you are in game and also on what is going on at the moment like explosions, heavy smoke, too many players around, vehicles (kind of...duh!!!) but I also pointed out that even with my (fast) quad core CPU (not 8+) and dual memory channels(not quad) I am still GPU bound (proof is GPU usage of 95%-99%).
But I get the point. You simply test at single player. There is no way around that (multiplayer is difficult to bench), but at the same time it throws the validity and reliability of the test away. Most BF players have got the game for multiplayer mode.
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9250
Hmm when did evga stop boycotting guru3d? rarely see evga reviews last few years