Patriot Viper V765 Keyboard Review
Combo deal: Office 2016 Pro and W10 for $34
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: RTX and DLSS Update
ASUS RT-AX88U (AX6000) router review
The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
URCDkey Spring Sale(up to 86% off) Windows 10 Pro $11
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming X review
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 VENTUS XS 6G OC review
Palit GeForce GTX 1660 StormX OC review
Corsair Crystal 680X PC Chassis Review
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW2 review
Posted by: on: 04/28/2017 07:41 AM [
13 comment(s) ]
We check out the EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW2 iCX 8G, and heck yeah this is not your regular one. Meet the all custom, cooled and tweaked EVGA "For-The-Win2" Edition. This SKU is a more premium version that comes with some new features, e.g. read sensors everywhere. We'll heck out the 8 GB product fitted with a nice and impressive two slot cooler, some extra LED functionality and a product that comes with some sexy out of the box clock frequencies.
Read article
Advertisement
mahanddeem
Senior Member
Posts: 640
Senior Member
Posts: 640
Posted on: 04/29/2017 07:42 AM
A question here:
Why every Guru3d GTX1080 review I see BF1 DX12 1080p FPS average is 145-148fps.
In my PC in BF1 my average is always 121-127fps (min 100 and 144fps capped max) DX12 1080p Ultra preset (CPU usage 50% to 75% max and GPU is always 95%-99%). That's multiplayer 64 player conquest servers with ping of 10ms.
A question here:
Why every Guru3d GTX1080 review I see BF1 DX12 1080p FPS average is 145-148fps.
In my PC in BF1 my average is always 121-127fps (min 100 and 144fps capped max) DX12 1080p Ultra preset (CPU usage 50% to 75% max and GPU is always 95%-99%). That's multiplayer 64 player conquest servers with ping of 10ms.
Lucifer
Senior Member
Posts: 200
Senior Member
Posts: 200
Posted on: 04/29/2017 10:03 AM
nice review HH, I hope the product innard page would be mandatory for all upcoming gpu review. It helps alot in making decisions in order to buy gpus or not.
nice review HH, I hope the product innard page would be mandatory for all upcoming gpu review. It helps alot in making decisions in order to buy gpus or not.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34676
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34676
Posted on: 04/29/2017 10:08 AM
A question here:
Why every Guru3d GTX1080 review I see BF1 DX12 1080p FPS average is 145-148fps.
In my PC in BF1 my average is always 121-127fps (min 100 and 144fps capped max) DX12 1080p Ultra preset (CPU usage 50% to 75% max and GPU is always 95%-99%). That's multiplayer 64 player conquest servers with ping of 10ms.
You basically answered your own question. You're on a 64 player Multi-player where I test in single player. Also I am on 8-cores + quad-channel memory and you on 4 + dual-channel, I assume with MP that does matter. Last but not least, FPS isn't a constant throughout the game. The actual scene can differ in scenery and thus FPS.
A question here:
Why every Guru3d GTX1080 review I see BF1 DX12 1080p FPS average is 145-148fps.
In my PC in BF1 my average is always 121-127fps (min 100 and 144fps capped max) DX12 1080p Ultra preset (CPU usage 50% to 75% max and GPU is always 95%-99%). That's multiplayer 64 player conquest servers with ping of 10ms.
You basically answered your own question. You're on a 64 player Multi-player where I test in single player. Also I am on 8-cores + quad-channel memory and you on 4 + dual-channel, I assume with MP that does matter. Last but not least, FPS isn't a constant throughout the game. The actual scene can differ in scenery and thus FPS.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34676
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34676
Posted on: 04/29/2017 10:09 AM
I'm still playing with that thought whether or not it is worth the hassle as yes, I did manage to kill a 1080 Ti recently.
nice review HH, I hope the product innard page would be mandatory for all upcoming gpu review. It helps alot in making decisions in order to buy gpus or not.
I'm still playing with that thought whether or not it is worth the hassle as yes, I did manage to kill a 1080 Ti recently.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34676
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34676
Posted on: 04/29/2017 10:10 AM
We're progressing and trying to move forward from the differences we had. At one point you need to move on.
Hmm when did evga stop boycotting guru3d? rarely see evga reviews last few years
We're progressing and trying to move forward from the differences we had. At one point you need to move on.
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11332
Senior Member
Posts: 11332
Posted on: 04/29/2017 05:03 PM
How did that happen?
When you break a review sample do you have to return the broken sample or do you pay out of pocket the value of it?
I'm still playing with that thought whether or not it is worth the hassle as yes, I did manage to kill a 1080 Ti recently.
How did that happen?
When you break a review sample do you have to return the broken sample or do you pay out of pocket the value of it?
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9094
Senior Member
Posts: 9094
Posted on: 04/29/2017 05:35 PM
that would be great I would love to see alot more evga reviews, seeing ever gpu I bought since series 6 have been evga
I would like to know what you did to it!
We're progressing and trying to move forward from the differences we had. At one point you need to move on.
that would be great I would love to see alot more evga reviews, seeing ever gpu I bought since series 6 have been evga
I'm still playing with that thought whether or not it is worth the hassle as yes, I did manage to kill a 1080 Ti recently.
I would like to know what you did to it!
airbud7
Senior Member
Posts: 6566
Senior Member
Posts: 6566
Posted on: 04/29/2017 05:43 PM
oh dear...I think I just shed a tear........
I did manage to kill a 1080 Ti recently.
oh dear...I think I just shed a tear........
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34676
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 34676
Posted on: 04/29/2017 05:49 PM
Yeah that's why I disassemble them AFTER I finished testing them
One of the cards had really sticky gluey thermal-pads in-between the heatsink block and vrm/memory etc. I had to use a bit of force to wiggle it loose. At first I figured nothing went wrong, but it likely got a micro-fracture.
That moment when you power up the PC and the screen stays black. Priceless
The AIB was cool about it though, no worries.
Yeah that's why I disassemble them AFTER I finished testing them
One of the cards had really sticky gluey thermal-pads in-between the heatsink block and vrm/memory etc. I had to use a bit of force to wiggle it loose. At first I figured nothing went wrong, but it likely got a micro-fracture.
That moment when you power up the PC and the screen stays black. Priceless
The AIB was cool about it though, no worries.
tsunami231
Senior Member
Posts: 9094
Senior Member
Posts: 9094
Posted on: 04/29/2017 06:14 PM
^
I remember that happen few of gpu my BFG cards come to mind
^
I remember that happen few of gpu my BFG cards come to mind
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 849
Senior Member
Posts: 849
Posted on: 04/30/2017 06:06 AM
Hilbert u could try baking the card if u really have to that sometimes fixes micro cracks.
Hilbert u could try baking the card if u really have to that sometimes fixes micro cracks.
mahanddeem
Senior Member
Posts: 640
Senior Member
Posts: 640
Posted on: 04/30/2017 07:25 AM
I fully understand the fact that fps is different depending where you are in game and also on what is going on at the moment like explosions, heavy smoke, too many players around, vehicles (kind of...duh!!!) but I also pointed out that even with my (fast) quad core CPU (not 8+) and dual memory channels(not quad) I am still GPU bound (proof is GPU usage of 95%-99%).
But I get the point. You simply test at single player. There is no way around that (multiplayer is difficult to bench), but at the same time it throws the validity and reliability of the test away. Most BF players have got the game for multiplayer mode.
You basically answered your own question. You're on a 64 player Multi-player where I test in single player. Also I am on 8-cores + quad-channel memory and you on 4 + dual-channel, I assume with MP that does matter. Last but not least, FPS isn't a constant throughout the game. The actual scene can differ in scenery and thus FPS.
I fully understand the fact that fps is different depending where you are in game and also on what is going on at the moment like explosions, heavy smoke, too many players around, vehicles (kind of...duh!!!) but I also pointed out that even with my (fast) quad core CPU (not 8+) and dual memory channels(not quad) I am still GPU bound (proof is GPU usage of 95%-99%).
But I get the point. You simply test at single player. There is no way around that (multiplayer is difficult to bench), but at the same time it throws the validity and reliability of the test away. Most BF players have got the game for multiplayer mode.
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9094
Hmm when did evga stop boycotting guru3d? rarely see evga reviews last few years