GeForce RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti - An Overview Thus far
Lian Li Strimer Review - RGB 24 Pin Extension Cable
Raijintek Orcus 240 AIO cooler review
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X review
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX review
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27UQ Monitor review
MSI B450i Gaming PLUS AC review
MSI Radeon RX 570 and 580 MECH 2 8G OC review
Preview: Unboxing Threadripper 2950X & 2990WX
Corsair SPEC Omega RGB review
Crysis 3 VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Posted by: on: 02/22/2013 08:58 PM [
164 comment(s) ]
In this review slash article we'll look at Crysis 3 VGA Graphics benchmark performance with roughly 22 graphics cards. The new and popular title is daunting from a graphics point of view. What do you need really? As a result, how will it perform on a selection of different graphics cards? This review will cover all these basics and then more so you know what choice to make either graphics card or in-game settings wise.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
crysis 3 Benchmarks
pages « 2 3 4 5 > »
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 32932
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 32932
Posted on: 02/23/2013 10:08 AM
Why is there always one prick that calls results BIAS just because he doesn't like what he sees ? We perform tests, write down the numbers and publish them. That's it.
Results can and always differ per website, different area's tested, different levels, different AA modes, different drivers, different test setups. We try to create an equal playing field for all cards tested but remember, we test based on the latest drivers with a fast platform on the very same SSD cloned OS images. These are the results but sure, always look at the results as an indication.
Why is there always one prick that calls results BIAS just because he doesn't like what he sees ? We perform tests, write down the numbers and publish them. That's it.
Results can and always differ per website, different area's tested, different levels, different AA modes, different drivers, different test setups. We try to create an equal playing field for all cards tested but remember, we test based on the latest drivers with a fast platform on the very same SSD cloned OS images. These are the results but sure, always look at the results as an indication.
SLI-756
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 7604
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 7604
Posted on: 02/23/2013 10:27 AM
Poor Hilbert needs some rest folks, the Titan has been covered from every angle, Crysis 3 was promoted from day one with all the stellar reveal vids, and now this, our own Crysis 3 gpu reference guide.
I'm glad it's the weekend Hilbert, i'm taking tonight off, credit card bill not due till next month anyways so whatevah!!
We love you, big Fella, ..and await your lara croft gpu benchy article when time is right!!!
Poor Hilbert needs some rest folks, the Titan has been covered from every angle, Crysis 3 was promoted from day one with all the stellar reveal vids, and now this, our own Crysis 3 gpu reference guide.
I'm glad it's the weekend Hilbert, i'm taking tonight off, credit card bill not due till next month anyways so whatevah!!
We love you, big Fella, ..and await your lara croft gpu benchy article when time is right!!!
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 7903
Senior Member
Posts: 7903
Posted on: 02/23/2013 10:46 AM
It doesnt say GHz "edition".
The cards are not specific models, there are no brands either.
Those clocked to 1GHz are labelled GHz.
Well we know there is a 7970ghz edition, so we must assume the one here is that. But never heard of a 7950 ghz model before, just the boost edition. So is the 7950 here clocked to 1ghz? If so, it is not a representative 7950.
It doesnt say GHz "edition".
The cards are not specific models, there are no brands either.
Those clocked to 1GHz are labelled GHz.
Well we know there is a 7970ghz edition, so we must assume the one here is that. But never heard of a 7950 ghz model before, just the boost edition. So is the 7950 here clocked to 1ghz? If so, it is not a representative 7950.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 32932
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 32932
Posted on: 02/23/2013 10:51 AM
GHz editions are marked as GHz. On the 7950 GHz .. that is the 'Boost' edition:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_hd_7950_with_boost_review,1.html
AMD really has no fixed name for the models with a dynamic turbo frequency hence I label it GHz these days. Unfortunately it is the only 7950 I have left for testing as we had to flash the regular 7950 towards this Boost/GHz model. I can see why that can be a little confusing though.
What do you guys prefer to have it called ? Boost or GHz edition ?
Well we know there is a 7970ghz edition, so we must assume the one here is that. But never heard of a 7950 ghz model before, just the boost edition. So is the 7950 here clocked to 1ghz? If so, it is not a representative 7950.
GHz editions are marked as GHz. On the 7950 GHz .. that is the 'Boost' edition:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_hd_7950_with_boost_review,1.html
AMD really has no fixed name for the models with a dynamic turbo frequency hence I label it GHz these days. Unfortunately it is the only 7950 I have left for testing as we had to flash the regular 7950 towards this Boost/GHz model. I can see why that can be a little confusing though.
What do you guys prefer to have it called ? Boost or GHz edition ?
ShutDown_Hussain
Member
Posts: 66
Member
Posts: 66
Posted on: 02/23/2013 10:53 AM
hilbert please include radeon hd 7870 xt (tahiti le). if you can now, please do. thank you.
hilbert please include radeon hd 7870 xt (tahiti le). if you can now, please do. thank you.
SLI-756
Member
Posts: 7604
Member
Posts: 7604
Posted on: 02/23/2013 10:56 AM
Boost sounds a little ghey when you say it back a few times, GHz makes sense, i always understood the 7970 GHz you had was a GHz edition and the 7950 GHz was like a MSI 670 'Power' edition.
Boost sounds a little ghey when you say it back a few times, GHz makes sense, i always understood the 7970 GHz you had was a GHz edition and the 7950 GHz was like a MSI 670 'Power' edition.
Mufflore
Senior Member
Posts: 10745
Senior Member
Posts: 10745
Posted on: 02/23/2013 10:58 AM
Great mini review HH.
I've played under an hour so far and found a tweak posted by DarrenSimmons to be well worth trying.
http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=4535260&postcount=1857
With my GTX580 clocked by about +20%, running max settings, no AA, vsync on, I havent seen max GPU use yet.
(313.95 driver)
It has hugged 60fps the whole time.
Its early in the game though so perhaps I'll eat my words
ps the game looks awesome!!
I take it back, was a bit premature, fps has dropped to 40s.
edit:
but it seems its a CPU limit, the gfx card wasnt maxed.
Damn 4.5GHz not enough!
Great mini review HH.
I've played under an hour so far and found a tweak posted by DarrenSimmons to be well worth trying.
http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=4535260&postcount=1857
With my GTX580 clocked by about +20%, running max settings, no AA, vsync on, I havent seen max GPU use yet.
(313.95 driver)
It has hugged 60fps the whole time.
Its early in the game though so perhaps I'll eat my words
ps the game looks awesome!!
I take it back, was a bit premature, fps has dropped to 40s.
edit:
but it seems its a CPU limit, the gfx card wasnt maxed.
Damn 4.5GHz not enough!
SLI-756
Senior Member
Posts: 7604
Senior Member
Posts: 7604
Posted on: 02/23/2013 11:00 AM
Those numbers sound about right.
I take it back, was a bit premature, fps has dropped to 40s.
Those numbers sound about right.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 32932
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 32932
Posted on: 02/23/2013 11:46 AM
I don't have that card sorry.
hilbert please include radeon hd 7870 xt (tahiti le). if you can now, please do. thank you.
I don't have that card sorry.
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 7903
Senior Member
Posts: 7903
Posted on: 02/23/2013 12:20 PM
AMD really has no fixed name for the models with a dynamic turbo frequency hence I label it GHz these days. Unfortunately it is the only 7950 I have left for testing as we had to flash the regular 7950 towards this Boost/GHz model. I can see why that can be a little confusing though.
What do you guys prefer to have it called ? Boost or GHz edition ?
If its clocked to 1 ghz than I guess it can be referred to as 7950 ghz. But if its flashed to the regular boost model (boosting to 925mhz), than it may be referred to as boost.
But you may want to clarify with an asterix if you add ghz to the 7950 because it will invite increased questioning from outside of this site (which I have seen).
AMD really has no fixed name for the models with a dynamic turbo frequency hence I label it GHz these days. Unfortunately it is the only 7950 I have left for testing as we had to flash the regular 7950 towards this Boost/GHz model. I can see why that can be a little confusing though.
What do you guys prefer to have it called ? Boost or GHz edition ?
If its clocked to 1 ghz than I guess it can be referred to as 7950 ghz. But if its flashed to the regular boost model (boosting to 925mhz), than it may be referred to as boost.
But you may want to clarify with an asterix if you add ghz to the 7950 because it will invite increased questioning from outside of this site (which I have seen).
hjalti8
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Junior Member
Posts: 12
Posted on: 02/23/2013 01:28 PM
Why is there always one prick that calls results BIAS just because he doesn't like what he sees ? We perform tests, write down the numbers and publish them. That's it.
Because you use FXAA.
I like your articles but if you want to be 100% unbaised use SMAA and/or MSAA.
Plus FXAA blurs everything. Its like putting uber thick AR coating on your monitor. It does get rid of jagged edges but textures are no longer sharp which can be really bad on high res monitors.
Why is there always one prick that calls results BIAS just because he doesn't like what he sees ? We perform tests, write down the numbers and publish them. That's it.
Because you use FXAA.
I like your articles but if you want to be 100% unbaised use SMAA and/or MSAA.
Plus FXAA blurs everything. Its like putting uber thick AR coating on your monitor. It does get rid of jagged edges but textures are no longer sharp which can be really bad on high res monitors.
Cyrax
Senior Member
Posts: 379
Senior Member
Posts: 379
Posted on: 02/23/2013 01:38 PM
Nice revieuw,
my GTX 580 SLi can keep up at high settings @ 2560 x 1600 ( average off 40-55 FPS)
But i am looking to upgrade to GTX Titan Sli
I was hoping to see what the Titan Sli-3sli does with a game like Crysis 3 at High resolutions.
Its probably the only sli setup that can reach a steady 60 FPS @ 2560 x 1600
Nice revieuw,
my GTX 580 SLi can keep up at high settings @ 2560 x 1600 ( average off 40-55 FPS)
But i am looking to upgrade to GTX Titan Sli
I was hoping to see what the Titan Sli-3sli does with a game like Crysis 3 at High resolutions.
Its probably the only sli setup that can reach a steady 60 FPS @ 2560 x 1600
Uncle Dude
Senior Member
Posts: 2308
Senior Member
Posts: 2308
Posted on: 02/23/2013 01:59 PM
Crytek CEO Cevat Yerli said:
"There are brutal expectations around the PC version of Crysis 3. So this time we promise to melt down PCs."
Who knew he was serious?
c:
Ok chaps, after years of trusty service and quite a bit of abuse from our side the GeForce GTX 570 seems to have died a horrible death...
Crytek CEO Cevat Yerli said:
"There are brutal expectations around the PC version of Crysis 3. So this time we promise to melt down PCs."
Who knew he was serious?
c:
Tomo
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Posted on: 02/23/2013 02:01 PM
Hilbert, thanks for effort its awesome read as always
Any chance to see vram usage test with multimonitor resolutions at 5960x1080 or even 5960x1200?
Tomo, Slovenia
Hilbert, thanks for effort its awesome read as always
Any chance to see vram usage test with multimonitor resolutions at 5960x1080 or even 5960x1200?
Tomo, Slovenia
---TK---
Senior Member
Posts: 22115
Senior Member
Posts: 22115
Posted on: 02/23/2013 02:05 PM
nice piece Boss
nice piece Boss
PNeV
Senior Member
Posts: 2071
Senior Member
Posts: 2071
Posted on: 02/23/2013 02:14 PM
Argh, the wait for me to play this game is killing me
I want to know how well my card is going to do but have to wait til Easter+ to buy it.
Argh, the wait for me to play this game is killing me
I want to know how well my card is going to do but have to wait til Easter+ to buy it.
GizmoSLI
Member
Posts: 25
Member
Posts: 25
Posted on: 02/23/2013 02:27 PM
Nice work Hilbert, thank you!
I did the same scene and here are my results (if anyone is interested in 7950 CF performance):
1080p Very High FXAA:
Frames Time (ms) Min Max Avg
12535 169557 43 121 73.928
Nice work Hilbert, thank you!
I did the same scene and here are my results (if anyone is interested in 7950 CF performance):
1080p Very High FXAA:
Frames Time (ms) Min Max Avg
12535 169557 43 121 73.928
orky87
Senior Member
Posts: 156
Senior Member
Posts: 156
Posted on: 02/23/2013 02:38 PM
Why was Asus HD7990 was not included in these test?
Why was Asus HD7990 was not included in these test?
Matt26LFC
Senior Member
Posts: 3042
Senior Member
Posts: 3042
Posted on: 02/23/2013 02:50 PM
My guess would be that Hilbert didn't have one to do so.
Why was Asus HD7990 was not included in these test?
My guess would be that Hilbert didn't have one to do so.
ShutDown_Hussain
Member
Posts: 66
Member
Posts: 66
Posted on: 02/23/2013 03:04 PM
oh. still a very good article. thank you!
I don't have that card sorry.
oh. still a very good article. thank you!
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 32932
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 32932
Posted on: 02/23/2013 03:07 PM
Correct
My guess would be that Hilbert didn't have one to do so.
Correct
ShutDown_Hussain
Member
Posts: 66
Member
Posts: 66
Posted on: 02/23/2013 03:10 PM
can anyone in the forum have a radeon hd 7870 xt (tahiti le) ? can you do the crysis 3 run (same as in the performance review), and report the results? thank you.
can anyone in the forum have a radeon hd 7870 xt (tahiti le) ? can you do the crysis 3 run (same as in the performance review), and report the results? thank you.
leveller
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Posted on: 02/23/2013 04:25 PM
Don't savage me if I am reading these results wrong. It looks to me that I need a 690 for my 2560x1600 monitor, rather than the Titan?
Don't savage me if I am reading these results wrong. It looks to me that I need a 690 for my 2560x1600 monitor, rather than the Titan?
Cyrax
Senior Member
Posts: 379
Senior Member
Posts: 379
Posted on: 02/23/2013 04:44 PM
Depends on how you look it Leveller.
I just like an Sli setup.and a GTX 690 just doesnt cut it for me personally, 2x 690 is a no go for me causse driver whise it sucks to play on 4 gpu`s
So im going for a Titan sli setup and im guessing i will be safe the next 2.5 Y to get my games @ maximum detail
Depends on how you look it Leveller.
I just like an Sli setup.and a GTX 690 just doesnt cut it for me personally, 2x 690 is a no go for me causse driver whise it sucks to play on 4 gpu`s
So im going for a Titan sli setup and im guessing i will be safe the next 2.5 Y to get my games @ maximum detail
pages « 2 3 4 5 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 10745
It doesnt say GHz "edition".
The cards are not specific models, there are no brands either.
Those clocked to 1GHz are labelled GHz.