Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Corsair Void RGB Elite Wireless Headset review
Team Group PD400 Portable SSD review
AMD Athlon 3000G review
Team Group T-Force Delta Max 1 TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - November 2019
ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore review
Toshiba RC500 500GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
Promo: URcdkey Black Friday Windows 10 Pro for $12
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Advanced OC review
Posted by: on: 06/20/2019 01:33 PM [
21 comment(s) ]
Colorful released their iGame advanced OC model of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, a product with more a triple fan cooler as well being factory tweaked towards an 1860 MHz boost frequency. Based on three fans and improved looks the card performs well.
Read article
Advertisement
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Posted on: 06/20/2019 02:28 PM
Barely faster than 1070, slower than V56, less vram than both, no rt cores. Its not a good card, stay away from this turing gtx cards.
Barely faster than 1070, slower than V56, less vram than both, no rt cores. Its not a good card, stay away from this turing gtx cards.
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 8977
Senior Member
Posts: 8977
Posted on: 06/20/2019 03:48 PM
You are comparing to the wrong cards. Its a tier lower than those and meant to compete against the RX 590.
Barely faster than 1070, slower than V56, less vram than both, no rt cores. Its not a good card, stay away from this turing gtx cards.
You are comparing to the wrong cards. Its a tier lower than those and meant to compete against the RX 590.
jbscotchman
Senior Member
Posts: 3311
Senior Member
Posts: 3311
Posted on: 06/20/2019 04:05 PM
40$ dollars for a fancy cooler, I don't think so. My 270$ 1660Ti overclocks and stays cool like a beast!
40$ dollars for a fancy cooler, I don't think so. My 270$ 1660Ti overclocks and stays cool like a beast!
airbud7
Senior Member
Posts: 7560
Senior Member
Posts: 7560
Posted on: 06/20/2019 04:58 PM
I don't care who you are that's a good-looking card!
I don't care who you are that's a good-looking card!
H83
Senior Member
Posts: 2747
Senior Member
Posts: 2747
Posted on: 06/20/2019 07:07 PM
Nice card but like Hilbert said it should be a little cheaper. But what i really like about the card is that it has a Turbo button!!!
Great review!
Nice card but like Hilbert said it should be a little cheaper. But what i really like about the card is that it has a Turbo button!!!
Great review!
BuildeR2
Senior Member
Posts: 2840
Senior Member
Posts: 2840
Posted on: 06/21/2019 06:07 AM
Nice review, good looking card. I like the addition of the "Replacing Thermal Paste" section near the end, but we are missing some important comparison points. It would help clarify whether or not the Noctua paste is better if we could see Fan % and RPM, possibly noise levels.
Like for my 1080Ti, for 6-7 months of the year I ran it at 2000MHz core/1.050v while it would top out at 76C and ~2500RPM fanspeed. Now we are in summer, I have it at 1800MHz core/0.900v while it tops out at 76C and ~1200RPM fanspeed.
Nice review, good looking card. I like the addition of the "Replacing Thermal Paste" section near the end, but we are missing some important comparison points. It would help clarify whether or not the Noctua paste is better if we could see Fan % and RPM, possibly noise levels.
Like for my 1080Ti, for 6-7 months of the year I ran it at 2000MHz core/1.050v while it would top out at 76C and ~2500RPM fanspeed. Now we are in summer, I have it at 1800MHz core/0.900v while it tops out at 76C and ~1200RPM fanspeed.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1345
Senior Member
Posts: 1345
Posted on: 06/21/2019 06:26 AM
Well, I don't think this is a very good example of a third party card, it runs quite warm at 65 degC but more importantly it's one of the noisiest cards tested at Guru3d according to the acoustic charts - how it can run so loud whilst being at just OK temperatures during a miniscule peak power consumption of 119W whilst having a third party 3 fan cooler strapped onto it is really baffling - under the circumstances one of the worst third party cards I've ever seen tested.
Well, I don't think this is a very good example of a third party card, it runs quite warm at 65 degC but more importantly it's one of the noisiest cards tested at Guru3d according to the acoustic charts - how it can run so loud whilst being at just OK temperatures during a miniscule peak power consumption of 119W whilst having a third party 3 fan cooler strapped onto it is really baffling - under the circumstances one of the worst third party cards I've ever seen tested.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Posted on: 06/21/2019 06:28 AM
1660 is there to compete with 590 but 1660ti is supposed to replace the 1070 and attack higher segment of amd and vega, it failed doing all that.
You are comparing to the wrong cards. Its a tier lower than those and meant to compete against the RX 590.
1660 is there to compete with 590 but 1660ti is supposed to replace the 1070 and attack higher segment of amd and vega, it failed doing all that.
jbscotchman
Senior Member
Posts: 3311
Senior Member
Posts: 3311
Posted on: 06/21/2019 07:29 AM
Man you really hate the 1660Ti don't ya. Maybe because it absolutely destroys a RX580 with less ram?
1660 is there to compete with 590 but 1660ti is supposed to replace the 1070 and attack higher segment of amd and vega, it failed doing all that.
Man you really hate the 1660Ti don't ya. Maybe because it absolutely destroys a RX580 with less ram?
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Posted on: 06/21/2019 07:50 AM
Yeah, turing gtx cards makes no sense. Used pascal or rtx are a better choise.
Man you really hate the 1660Ti don't ya. Maybe because it absolutely destroys a RX580 with less ram?
Yeah, turing gtx cards makes no sense. Used pascal or rtx are a better choise.
Petr V
Senior Member
Posts: 274
Senior Member
Posts: 274
Posted on: 06/21/2019 07:56 AM
And curent turing rtx cards makes no sense also i am curious if they will keep this pricing on 7nm ampere.
Yeah, turing gtx cards makes no sense. Used pascal or rtx are a better choise.
And curent turing rtx cards makes no sense also i am curious if they will keep this pricing on 7nm ampere.
jbscotchman
Senior Member
Posts: 3311
Senior Member
Posts: 3311
Posted on: 06/21/2019 07:57 AM
What reviews are you reading?
Yeah, turing gtx cards makes no sense. Used pascal or rtx are a better choise.
What reviews are you reading?
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9762
Senior Member
Posts: 9762
Posted on: 06/21/2019 08:21 AM
Is that supposed to be funny?
Cheapest 1660Ti costs 50% more than average RX-580 8G. Yet it's average performance gain is 30%.
Considering that RX-580 is 1080p card, what would it look like if I used price tag of 4G version? Or cheapest to cheapest comparison?
Man you really hate the 1660Ti don't ya. Maybe because it absolutely destroys a RX580 with less ram?
Is that supposed to be funny?
Cheapest 1660Ti costs 50% more than average RX-580 8G. Yet it's average performance gain is 30%.
Considering that RX-580 is 1080p card, what would it look like if I used price tag of 4G version? Or cheapest to cheapest comparison?
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Posted on: 06/21/2019 08:25 AM
Is that supposed to be funny?
Cheapest 1660Ti costs 50% more than average RX-580 8G. Yet it's average performance gain is 30%.
Considering that RX-580 is 1080p card, what would it look like if I used price tag of 4G version? Or cheapest to cheapest comparison?
He always starts the argument how his cards beats mine which makes no sense. He payed 280$ for the lowest msi version of the 1660ti. In used market gtx1080 can be had for that price.
Is that supposed to be funny?
Cheapest 1660Ti costs 50% more than average RX-580 8G. Yet it's average performance gain is 30%.
Considering that RX-580 is 1080p card, what would it look like if I used price tag of 4G version? Or cheapest to cheapest comparison?
He always starts the argument how his cards beats mine which makes no sense. He payed 280$ for the lowest msi version of the 1660ti. In used market gtx1080 can be had for that price.
jbscotchman
Senior Member
Posts: 3311
Senior Member
Posts: 3311
Posted on: 06/21/2019 08:51 AM
Oh it's on brother.
He always starts the argument how his cards beats mine which makes no sense. He payed 280$ for the lowest msi version of the 1660ti. In used market gtx1080 can be had for that price.
Oh it's on brother.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Senior Member
Posts: 11993
Posted on: 06/21/2019 09:12 AM
Bring it on brother!
Oh it's on brother.
Bring it on brother!
jbscotchman
Senior Member
Posts: 3311
Senior Member
Posts: 3311
Posted on: 06/21/2019 02:47 PM
lol, oh man this is a funny feud.
lol, oh man this is a funny feud.
PsyaNyde
Member
Posts: 28
Member
Posts: 28
Posted on: 06/26/2019 06:27 AM
The v56 is CHEAPER over here in the UK and that makes it perfectly acceptable to compare to a 1660ti, this whole range from nvidia has been a failure imho due to over pricing.
You are comparing to the wrong cards. Its a tier lower than those and meant to compete against the RX 590.
The v56 is CHEAPER over here in the UK and that makes it perfectly acceptable to compare to a 1660ti, this whole range from nvidia has been a failure imho due to over pricing.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9762
Senior Member
Posts: 9762
Posted on: 06/26/2019 06:29 AM
Depends on how much cheaper. And what cards is meant for. Because there is not small power draw difference too.
I am sure some scenarios will be better on green and other on red.
The v56 is CHEAPER over here in the UK and that makes it perfectly acceptable to compare to a 1660ti, this whole range from nvidia has been a failure imho due to over pricing.
Depends on how much cheaper. And what cards is meant for. Because there is not small power draw difference too.
I am sure some scenarios will be better on green and other on red.
fry178
Senior Member
Posts: 1247
Senior Member
Posts: 1247
Posted on: 07/17/2019 09:46 PM
@PsyaNydee
Price isnt always a priority for ppl.
If my card performed faster while running cooler and consuming less poewer, i dont mind spending more.
The same reason ppl buy a corvette/porsche for 100k, while others spend 2M on a veyron that is only about 70mph faster..
@PsyaNydee
Price isnt always a priority for ppl.
If my card performed faster while running cooler and consuming less poewer, i dont mind spending more.
The same reason ppl buy a corvette/porsche for 100k, while others spend 2M on a veyron that is only about 70mph faster..
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 274
Nice cooler.