Cooler Master MasterBox NR600 review
MSI to unveil 10th Anniversary RTX 2080 Ti Lightning Edition
Ballistix Elite 3600 MHz 16GB Dual Channel DDR4 review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC2900 Gaming Router review
Asustor Nimbustor 4 (AS5304T) NAS Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
be quiet! Dark Rock SLIM review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming OC review
Edifier G4 Pro Headset review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics benchmark review
Posted by: on: 11/04/2016 11:21 AM [
53 comment(s) ]
It's that time of the year, Infinity Ward and Raven Software releases Call of Duty in it's Infinite Warfare glory has been released. We will look at the game in our geeky gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3
EdInk
Member
Posts: 98
Member
Posts: 98
Posted on: 11/04/2016 12:57 PM
Thanks HH for this swift benchmark.
Most impressive card for me in this line up at 1080p would be the RX470. What a performance!
Thanks HH for this swift benchmark.
Most impressive card for me in this line up at 1080p would be the RX470. What a performance!
xIcarus
Senior Member
Posts: 935
Senior Member
Posts: 935
Posted on: 11/04/2016 01:43 PM
What's up with the 970 results? Nvidia shafting us already?
What's up with the 970 results? Nvidia shafting us already?
realmadrid
Senior Member
Posts: 178
Senior Member
Posts: 178
Posted on: 11/04/2016 01:52 PM
the gimping is so real
the gimping is so real
saucerer
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Posted on: 11/04/2016 02:09 PM
What motherboard did you use for AMD FX-8370 tests?
What motherboard did you use for AMD FX-8370 tests?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35095
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35095
Posted on: 11/04/2016 02:12 PM
The MSI 970 Gaming.
What motherboard did you use for AMD FX-8370 tests?
The MSI 970 Gaming.
mattm4
Senior Member
Posts: 157
Senior Member
Posts: 157
Posted on: 11/04/2016 02:17 PM
That RX480 is kicking @$$ and taking names!!
But on a side note... I feel its really time for COD to make a new engine, and revamp the whole game, instead of a few new features and a little polish on the graphics. I would consider buying one of their games then. But I guess..... if they keep getting good sales at a priemium price, why revamp it? lol
That RX480 is kicking @$$ and taking names!!
But on a side note... I feel its really time for COD to make a new engine, and revamp the whole game, instead of a few new features and a little polish on the graphics. I would consider buying one of their games then. But I guess..... if they keep getting good sales at a priemium price, why revamp it? lol
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10894
Senior Member
Posts: 10894
Posted on: 11/04/2016 02:25 PM
Yeah, very nice performance from RX480. Outperforming 980 and 390X and even a Fury Pro.
Yeah, very nice performance from RX480. Outperforming 980 and 390X and even a Fury Pro.
DeskStar
Senior Member
Posts: 527
Senior Member
Posts: 527
Posted on: 11/04/2016 03:00 PM
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
CronoGraal
Senior Member
Posts: 4162
Senior Member
Posts: 4162
Posted on: 11/04/2016 03:02 PM
they shafted you when they sold you a 3.5gb card
What's up with the 970 results? Nvidia shafting us already?
they shafted you when they sold you a 3.5gb card
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9121
Senior Member
Posts: 9121
Posted on: 11/04/2016 03:02 PM
Probably has something to do with the memory configuration. Nvidia may optimize it in a later driver (or not).
After looking closer may not be any issue. It's just a tad faster than the 780ti and about 20% slower than the 980. Seems about where it should be. This title is on a older engine that Kepler still has some optimization for so it may be you guys are seeing that.
What's up with the 970 results? Nvidia shafting us already?
Probably has something to do with the memory configuration. Nvidia may optimize it in a later driver (or not).
After looking closer may not be any issue. It's just a tad faster than the 780ti and about 20% slower than the 980. Seems about where it should be. This title is on a older engine that Kepler still has some optimization for so it may be you guys are seeing that.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 10894
Senior Member
Posts: 10894
Posted on: 11/04/2016 03:03 PM
Low end card? Fury X is a third best performing card this review. You really have no idea what your talking about.
They real sad part is that you cannot use your 4xTitan cards in any game.
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
Low end card? Fury X is a third best performing card this review. You really have no idea what your talking about.
They real sad part is that you cannot use your 4xTitan cards in any game.
mattm4
Senior Member
Posts: 157
Senior Member
Posts: 157
Posted on: 11/04/2016 03:26 PM
Deskstar, either you're one of those fanboys or a troll out against AMD. Most of your posts I've seen have been attacks on AMD for dumb reasons. Some of which come across that you really don't know what you're talking about half the time.
But... I cant take anyone seriously when they have 4x Titans, and run a 120hz monitor.. cause that's plain stupid lol.
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
Deskstar, either you're one of those fanboys or a troll out against AMD. Most of your posts I've seen have been attacks on AMD for dumb reasons. Some of which come across that you really don't know what you're talking about half the time.
But... I cant take anyone seriously when they have 4x Titans, and run a 120hz monitor.. cause that's plain stupid lol.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35095
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35095
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:11 PM
Guys, how about not fighting and insulting for a change?, it would make a heck of a paradox towards the game right
Guys, how about not fighting and insulting for a change?, it would make a heck of a paradox towards the game right
Singleton99
Senior Member
Posts: 996
Senior Member
Posts: 996
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:13 PM
Are you looking at different benchmarks to everyone else @ 1440p the fury-x is 2fps behind a 980ti which is pretty much equal , i class this as a excellent show for AMD and just confirms how well a 4gb card is still performing in the latest games today
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
Are you looking at different benchmarks to everyone else @ 1440p the fury-x is 2fps behind a 980ti which is pretty much equal , i class this as a excellent show for AMD and just confirms how well a 4gb card is still performing in the latest games today
Turanis
Senior Member
Posts: 1404
Senior Member
Posts: 1404
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:20 PM
Errmm...HBM is not GDDR5/X!
HBM releases textures & stuff from memory with more Speed than Gddr5/x.
So better get informed than spread non-sense.
When you get Gtx with HBM then you can talk real,until then stay low.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MGLQWlXo0Q&feature=youtu.be&t=2m48s
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
Errmm...HBM is not GDDR5/X!
HBM releases textures & stuff from memory with more Speed than Gddr5/x.
So better get informed than spread non-sense.
When you get Gtx with HBM then you can talk real,until then stay low.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MGLQWlXo0Q&feature=youtu.be&t=2m48s
kinggavin
Senior Member
Posts: 297
Senior Member
Posts: 297
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:23 PM
read the article my thoughts are considering this runs on a ps4 which is older hardware hd7870 and looking at the graphics quality which is not great its shocking that the orginial titan £1000 card on release which has pretty beefy specs to this day and a nice 6gb of vram is way down the bottom with a 1050 ti
read the article my thoughts are considering this runs on a ps4 which is older hardware hd7870 and looking at the graphics quality which is not great its shocking that the orginial titan £1000 card on release which has pretty beefy specs to this day and a nice 6gb of vram is way down the bottom with a 1050 ti
Koniakki
Senior Member
Posts: 2797
Senior Member
Posts: 2797
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:31 PM
I would say more close to a GTX 970 and it's called progress.
read the article my thoughts are considering this runs on a ps4 which is older hardware hd7870 and looking at the graphics quality which is not great its shocking that the orginial titan card on release which has pretty beefy specs to this day and a nice 6gb of vram is way down the bottom with a 1050 ti
I would say more close to a GTX 970 and it's called progress.
huilun02
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Senior Member
Posts: 327
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:35 PM
So BF1 looks way better with far larger maps, higher player count, better assets, and yet uses less VRAM and manages to run better on the same equipment.
Bravo, Activision.
So BF1 looks way better with far larger maps, higher player count, better assets, and yet uses less VRAM and manages to run better on the same equipment.
Bravo, Activision.
PrMinisterGR
Senior Member
Posts: 6972
Senior Member
Posts: 6972
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:49 PM
How is the 380x the same as a 970. WTF happened.
How is the 380x the same as a 970. WTF happened.
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16131
Senior Member
Posts: 16131
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:49 PM
Does the game have artificial 125fps cap?
Does the game have artificial 125fps cap?
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9121
Senior Member
Posts: 9121
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:58 PM
AMD seems to have a bit of an edge in this title. Just look at the 480.
How is the 380x the same as a 970. WTF happened.
AMD seems to have a bit of an edge in this title. Just look at the 480.
Embra
Senior Member
Posts: 813
Senior Member
Posts: 813
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:59 PM
Still running a Piledriver, I really appreciate you adding the AMD CPU numbers HH!
Thank you!
Still running a Piledriver, I really appreciate you adding the AMD CPU numbers HH!
Thank you!
PrMinisterGR
Senior Member
Posts: 6972
Senior Member
Posts: 6972
Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:59 PM
Looks like a lot of an edge. And Polaris with the Primitive Discard Accelerator seems to be doing really well compared to previous GCN. I wonder if it has always been like this, or if they changed the engine now in anticipation of the PS4 Pro release.
AMD seems to have a bit of an edge in this title. Just look at the 480.
Looks like a lot of an edge. And Polaris with the Primitive Discard Accelerator seems to be doing really well compared to previous GCN. I wonder if it has always been like this, or if they changed the engine now in anticipation of the PS4 Pro release.
NudeDude
Member
Posts: 21
Member
Posts: 21
Posted on: 11/04/2016 05:38 PM
Yeah, is this Campaign also capped to 125, or is this just heavier than BF1 and BO3?
Damn i hate these FSP caps, no use for my 165Hz screen. Multiplayer is capped to 91 with this and with CoD4 remastered.
Any change to unlock it? Banned by that?
Yeah, is this Campaign also capped to 125, or is this just heavier than BF1 and BO3?
Damn i hate these FSP caps, no use for my 165Hz screen. Multiplayer is capped to 91 with this and with CoD4 remastered.
Any change to unlock it? Banned by that?
pages 1 2 3
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 10894
Thanks for another game benchmark, HH. Next stop Dishonored 2
Overall decent performance from both sides. I wonder how MW remaster compare to this IW.