Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics benchmark review

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/04/2016 11:21 AM [ 53 comment(s) ]

It's that time of the year, Infinity Ward and Raven Software releases Call of Duty in it's Infinite Warfare glory has been released. We will look at the game in our geeky gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.

Read article

Advertisement

Tagged as: Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics Performance Analysis, Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC benchmarks

pages « 3 4 5 6 > »

Turanis
Senior Member

Posts: 1779

Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:20 PM

I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.

Errmm...HBM is not GDDR5/X!

HBM releases textures & stuff from memory with more Speed than Gddr5/x.
So better get informed than spread non-sense.
When you get Gtx with HBM then you can talk real,until then stay low.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MGLQWlXo0Q&feature=youtu.be&t=2m48s

kinggavin
Senior Member

Posts: 297

Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:23 PM

read the article my thoughts are considering this runs on a ps4 which is older hardware hd7870 and looking at the graphics quality which is not great its shocking that the orginial titan £1000 card on release which has pretty beefy specs to this day and a nice 6gb of vram is way down the bottom with a 1050 ti

Koniakki
Senior Member

Posts: 2843

Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:31 PM

read the article my thoughts are considering this runs on a ps4 which is older hardware hd7870 and looking at the graphics quality which is not great its shocking that the orginial titan card on release which has pretty beefy specs to this day and a nice 6gb of vram is way down the bottom with a 1050 ti

I would say more close to a GTX 970 and it's called progress.

Deleted member 252477
Unregistered

Posted on: 11/04/2016 04:35 PM

So BF1 looks way better with far larger maps, higher player count, better assets, and yet uses less VRAM and manages to run better on the same equipment.
Bravo, Activision.

PrMinisterGR
Senior Member