Intel Core i7-10700K processor review
Deepcool Gamerstorm Castle 280EX liquid cooler review
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT review
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT review
Crucial P2 500 GB NVMe M2 SSD review
ASUS STRIX B550-I Gaming review
Kioxia Exceria 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD review
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - June 2020
Call of Duty Ghosts VGA graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 11/07/2013 03:28 PM [
36 comment(s) ]
We benchmark Call of Duty Ghosts. Join us in this preliminary article where close to 20 graphics cards are being tested with the new Call of Duty Ghosts. As such we'll take a dozen of graphics cards today and have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. The new and popular title is looking great from a graphics point of view.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Slikar
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Posted on: 11/06/2013 04:34 PM
What is this? Titan and 290x on 1600x1200 not even 60fps
nice job IW , nice job..
What is this? Titan and 290x on 1600x1200 not even 60fps
nice job IW , nice job..
moab600
Senior Member
Posts: 6199
Senior Member
Posts: 6199
Posted on: 11/06/2013 04:34 PM
game is such unoptimized horrible performance, this game should be banned from PC until they fix it.
game is such unoptimized horrible performance, this game should be banned from PC until they fix it.
CrazY_Milojko
Senior Member
Posts: 1992
Senior Member
Posts: 1992
Posted on: 11/06/2013 04:44 PM
Nice review Hilbert, but I have one question: GeForce GTX 690 results are there, but where are Radeon HD 7990 results?
Edit:
My bad, I've missed that: "...The mighty Radeon HD 7990 caves in, Crossfire did not kick in...". ...because I was probably shocked by low fps results on high-end Radeon cards.
Edit #2:
I've loled so hard after closer look @ results because I was not looking below 7970.
1600x1200 GTX 660 = 41 / R9 290X = 51
1920x1200 GTX 660 = 37 / R9 290X = 51
2560x1440 GTX 660 = 30 / R9 290X = 45
R9 290X could easily obliterate my GTX 660 in any game today, it's obvius that NVidia's money is drilling holes everywhere they can, "good job" NVidia, but you can go to hell as far as I'm concerned, my next card probably will be from 79xx/R9-280X series... Hope that new Radeon drivers will improve performance in CoD:Ghosts for Radeon 78xx/79xx/R9 2xx cards, but after all who cares about CoD games on PC anymore.
Nice review Hilbert, but I have one question: GeForce GTX 690 results are there, but where are Radeon HD 7990 results?
Edit:
My bad, I've missed that: "...The mighty Radeon HD 7990 caves in, Crossfire did not kick in...". ...because I was probably shocked by low fps results on high-end Radeon cards.
Edit #2:
I've loled so hard after closer look @ results because I was not looking below 7970.
1600x1200 GTX 660 = 41 / R9 290X = 51
1920x1200 GTX 660 = 37 / R9 290X = 51
2560x1440 GTX 660 = 30 / R9 290X = 45
R9 290X could easily obliterate my GTX 660 in any game today, it's obvius that NVidia's money is drilling holes everywhere they can, "good job" NVidia, but you can go to hell as far as I'm concerned, my next card probably will be from 79xx/R9-280X series... Hope that new Radeon drivers will improve performance in CoD:Ghosts for Radeon 78xx/79xx/R9 2xx cards, but after all who cares about CoD games on PC anymore.
cowie
Senior Member
Posts: 13235
Senior Member
Posts: 13235
Posted on: 11/06/2013 04:46 PM
hell i could still be on a 680 if a played this game,whats wrong with that?
A 250usd card plays it as well as a 1000usd card. Thats a game that is for the masses not like the other shooter game that came out just the other day
game is such unoptimized horrible performance, this game should be banned from PC until they fix it.
hell i could still be on a 680 if a played this game,whats wrong with that?
A 250usd card plays it as well as a 1000usd card. Thats a game that is for the masses not like the other shooter game that came out just the other day
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Posts: 9094
Cheers Hilbert, awesome write up.
I still think nvidia and IW missed an opportunity to ship retail pc versions in a fur covered dvd case and then, when you open it, random crap falls out onto the ground representing PhysX.. well thats probably more gravity and an annoying mess to clean up... but its still be better than 'John Romero is going to make you his b***h' advertising campaign.