Guru3D Thermal Paste Roundup 2019
Back-to-school Microsoft Office 2016 $18 Win 10 Pro $12
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan 1TB SSD Review
Corsair K57 RGB Wireless keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review
PowerColor 5700 RED DEVIL review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT ROG STRIX review
ViewSonic Elite XG240R Monitor Review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
BioShock Infinite VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Posted by: on: 03/27/2013 07:40 PM [
55 comment(s) ]
In this review slash article we'll look at BioShock Infinite VGA Graphics benchmark performance with roughly 20 graphics cards. The new and popular title is interesting from a graphics point of view. What do you need really? As a result, how will it perform on a selection of different graphics cards? This review will cover all these basics and then more so you know what choice to make either graphics card or in-game settings wise.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
Bioshock Infinite Benchmarks
pages 1 2 3
SLI-756
Senior Member
Posts: 7604
Senior Member
Posts: 7604
Posted on: 03/27/2013 08:03 PM
At 1080, i've seen 1.9gb vram being used on early level without any AA enabled, i wonder if i did inject some AA if the same place in-game would use more vram pushing it over the 2gb zone.
Excellent work HH!
At 1080, i've seen 1.9gb vram being used on early level without any AA enabled, i wonder if i did inject some AA if the same place in-game would use more vram pushing it over the 2gb zone.
Excellent work HH!
Cyrax
Senior Member
Posts: 381
Senior Member
Posts: 381
Posted on: 03/27/2013 08:23 PM
playes good on titan indeed.
but seems sli is not kicking in only have 50 %usage/card
nive revieuw btw
playes good on titan indeed.
but seems sli is not kicking in only have 50 %usage/card
nive revieuw btw
bryonhowley
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Senior Member
Posts: 109
Posted on: 03/27/2013 08:24 PM
Strange they are seeing something odd going on with AMD or the drivers and yet the only rig I am getting any stutter problem in is my rig with SLI GTX 670's! I have two other rigs one with a Crossfire Sapphire HD 7950 and another with a Sapphire HD 7970 neither have any problems at all.
Strange they are seeing something odd going on with AMD or the drivers and yet the only rig I am getting any stutter problem in is my rig with SLI GTX 670's! I have two other rigs one with a Crossfire Sapphire HD 7950 and another with a Sapphire HD 7970 neither have any problems at all.
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9166
Senior Member
Posts: 9166
Posted on: 03/27/2013 08:33 PM
The first frame stutter chart says GTX Titan but the text below it says "Above GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost".
Anyway, great review, thanks for including the new analysis for us. Even if Fraps is not the best tool for an accurate analysis, it's still better than nothing. I just installed GPUView (installer is included in the Microsoft Win 7 SDK)... it's not exactly user friendly... yeaaahhh... I'm too lazy to learn how to use that.
The first frame stutter chart says GTX Titan but the text below it says "Above GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost".
Anyway, great review, thanks for including the new analysis for us. Even if Fraps is not the best tool for an accurate analysis, it's still better than nothing. I just installed GPUView (installer is included in the Microsoft Win 7 SDK)... it's not exactly user friendly... yeaaahhh... I'm too lazy to learn how to use that.
fwixgamer
Member
Posts: 21
Member
Posts: 21
Posted on: 03/27/2013 08:53 PM
wait wait wait , what the heck is this u wanna tell me nvdia gpu's run better in this game lol even the gtx 650 ti is better then the hd 7870 and the hd 7970 ghz defeated by gtx 680 i think u have something wrong with your bench ore perhaps guru3d are highly payed from nvidia ore what ?
check this http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/bioshock-infinite-test-gpu.html
all the bench show amd gpu's are so strong in this game perhaps when DDOF are used nvidia show nice performance and gtx 680 are at the same performance of 7970 ghz but when i compare your bench with this one there is allot of difference a really a big difference , i know every bench is different (hardware scene etc .. ) but this .... , u need to check again your review
wait wait wait , what the heck is this u wanna tell me nvdia gpu's run better in this game lol even the gtx 650 ti is better then the hd 7870 and the hd 7970 ghz defeated by gtx 680 i think u have something wrong with your bench ore perhaps guru3d are highly payed from nvidia ore what ?
check this http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/bioshock-infinite-test-gpu.html
all the bench show amd gpu's are so strong in this game perhaps when DDOF are used nvidia show nice performance and gtx 680 are at the same performance of 7970 ghz but when i compare your bench with this one there is allot of difference a really a big difference , i know every bench is different (hardware scene etc .. ) but this .... , u need to check again your review
CPC_RedDawn
Senior Member
Posts: 7650
Senior Member
Posts: 7650
Posted on: 03/27/2013 08:56 PM
Try running the tests with FULLSCREEN BORDERLESS WINDOWED MODE
I have that enabled and get 60fps 99% of the time.
Try running the tests with FULLSCREEN BORDERLESS WINDOWED MODE
I have that enabled and get 60fps 99% of the time.
IcE
Posts: 10693
Posts: 10693
Posted on: 03/27/2013 09:00 PM
wait wait wait , what the heck is this u wanna tell me nvdia gpu's run better in this game lol even the gtx 650 ti is better then the hd 7870 and the hd 7970 ghz defeated by gtx 680 i think u have something wrong with your bench ore perhaps guru3d are highly payed from nvidia ore what ?
check this http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/bioshock-infinite-test-gpu.html
all the bench show amd gpu's are so strong in this game perhaps when DDOF are used nvidia show nice performance and gtx 680 are at the same performance of 7970 ghz but when i compare your bench with this one there is allot of difference a really a big difference , i know every bench is different (hardware scene etc .. ) but this .... , u need to check again your review
Nvidia is not paying Hilbert. It's far more likely that no name bench site is the one being paid for. These are the results, whether you like them or not.
wait wait wait , what the heck is this u wanna tell me nvdia gpu's run better in this game lol even the gtx 650 ti is better then the hd 7870 and the hd 7970 ghz defeated by gtx 680 i think u have something wrong with your bench ore perhaps guru3d are highly payed from nvidia ore what ?
check this http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/bioshock-infinite-test-gpu.html
all the bench show amd gpu's are so strong in this game perhaps when DDOF are used nvidia show nice performance and gtx 680 are at the same performance of 7970 ghz but when i compare your bench with this one there is allot of difference a really a big difference , i know every bench is different (hardware scene etc .. ) but this .... , u need to check again your review
Nvidia is not paying Hilbert. It's far more likely that no name bench site is the one being paid for. These are the results, whether you like them or not.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35731
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35731
Posted on: 03/27/2013 09:05 PM
wait wait wait , what the heck is this u wanna tell me nvdia gpu's run better in this game lol even the gtx 650 ti is better then the hd 7870 and the hd 7970 ghz defeated by gtx 680 i think u have something wrong with your bench ore perhaps guru3d are highly payed from nvidia ore what ?
check this http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/bioshock-infinite-test-gpu.html
all the bench show amd gpu's are so strong in this game perhaps when DDOF are used nvidia show nice performance and gtx 680 are at the same performance of 7970 ghz but when i compare your bench with this one there is allot of difference a really a big difference , i know every bench is different (hardware scene etc .. ) but this .... , u need to check again your review
I've just compared the 25x16 Ultra Quality with DDOF FXAA performance from us with theirs, and there is very little difference. You are confused, the GTX 650 Ti you refer to is the yesterday released BOOST edition, as clearly marked in the charts. Not the regular Ti one.
BTW, the next guy that claims we are BIAS to either AMD or NVIDIA, insinuate that we get paid for these reviews will get banned. I'm not joking, I spend a lot of time and work on these articles and do not wish or deserve to be insulted.
wait wait wait , what the heck is this u wanna tell me nvdia gpu's run better in this game lol even the gtx 650 ti is better then the hd 7870 and the hd 7970 ghz defeated by gtx 680 i think u have something wrong with your bench ore perhaps guru3d are highly payed from nvidia ore what ?
check this http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/bioshock-infinite-test-gpu.html
all the bench show amd gpu's are so strong in this game perhaps when DDOF are used nvidia show nice performance and gtx 680 are at the same performance of 7970 ghz but when i compare your bench with this one there is allot of difference a really a big difference , i know every bench is different (hardware scene etc .. ) but this .... , u need to check again your review
I've just compared the 25x16 Ultra Quality with DDOF FXAA performance from us with theirs, and there is very little difference. You are confused, the GTX 650 Ti you refer to is the yesterday released BOOST edition, as clearly marked in the charts. Not the regular Ti one.
BTW, the next guy that claims we are BIAS to either AMD or NVIDIA, insinuate that we get paid for these reviews will get banned. I'm not joking, I spend a lot of time and work on these articles and do not wish or deserve to be insulted.
3dPlayer
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 1820
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 1820
Posted on: 03/27/2013 09:16 PM
Thanks for the review Sir Hagedoorn.
Thanks for the review Sir Hagedoorn.
GeniusPr0
Senior Member
Posts: 1232
Senior Member
Posts: 1232
Posted on: 03/27/2013 09:28 PM
I've just compared the 25x16 Ultra Quality with DDOF FXAA performance from us with theirs, and there is very little difference. You are confused, the GTX 650 Ti you refer to is the yesterday released BOOST edition, as clearly marked in the charts. Not the regular Ti one.
BTW, the next guy that claims we are BIAS to either AMD or NVIDIA, insinuate that we get paid for these reviews will get banned. I'm not joking, I spend a lot of time and work on these articles and do not wish or deserve to be insulted.
There will always be a majority or perhaps minority that understands and has already read your written benching philosophy.
If people don't know how to interpret data they can always go elsewhere.
I've just compared the 25x16 Ultra Quality with DDOF FXAA performance from us with theirs, and there is very little difference. You are confused, the GTX 650 Ti you refer to is the yesterday released BOOST edition, as clearly marked in the charts. Not the regular Ti one.
BTW, the next guy that claims we are BIAS to either AMD or NVIDIA, insinuate that we get paid for these reviews will get banned. I'm not joking, I spend a lot of time and work on these articles and do not wish or deserve to be insulted.
There will always be a majority or perhaps minority that understands and has already read your written benching philosophy.
If people don't know how to interpret data they can always go elsewhere.
fwixgamer
Member
Posts: 21
Member
Posts: 21
Posted on: 03/27/2013 09:28 PM
emmmmm okey i believe so but what i see here is a different story look at the gamegpu bench so how can u explain the big difference ? i mean yeah from different hardware and other stuff but i believe the mechanism of the bench are the same as the game have his own bench tool so how i can believe those information ore also if someone ask me are this game a flavor nvidia ore amd (yep some gpu's fanboys ) what is the good answer ? but any way i didn't say he did bad thing just to recheck again and try other settings to see if he ll have the same performance in both nvidia amd !
ps: gamegpu is not a noname site
all the bench there are true i did tested allot of latest games with both nvidia /amd , and i can tall u all of those information are true perhaps cpu side I'm not sure bur gpu thing all the information there are true and u can tested by ur self
Nvidia is not paying Hilbert. It's far more likely that no name bench site is the one being paid for. These are the results, whether you like them or not.
emmmmm okey i believe so but what i see here is a different story look at the gamegpu bench so how can u explain the big difference ? i mean yeah from different hardware and other stuff but i believe the mechanism of the bench are the same as the game have his own bench tool so how i can believe those information ore also if someone ask me are this game a flavor nvidia ore amd (yep some gpu's fanboys ) what is the good answer ? but any way i didn't say he did bad thing just to recheck again and try other settings to see if he ll have the same performance in both nvidia amd !
ps: gamegpu is not a noname site
all the bench there are true i did tested allot of latest games with both nvidia /amd , and i can tall u all of those information are true perhaps cpu side I'm not sure bur gpu thing all the information there are true and u can tested by ur self
mohiuddin
Senior Member
Posts: 753
Senior Member
Posts: 753
Posted on: 03/27/2013 09:33 PM
Awesome review.
Waiting for FCAT bench.
Can u please try what CPC_RedDawn said at post no #8?
Plz.
Awesome review.
Waiting for FCAT bench.
Can u please try what CPC_RedDawn said at post no #8?
Plz.
fwixgamer
Member
Posts: 21
Member
Posts: 21
Posted on: 03/27/2013 09:36 PM
I've just compared the 25x16 Ultra Quality with DDOF FXAA performance from us with theirs, and there is very little difference. You are confused, the GTX 650 Ti you refer to is the yesterday released BOOST edition, as clearly marked in the charts. Not the regular Ti one.
BTW, the next guy that claims we are BIAS to either AMD or NVIDIA, insinuate that we get paid for these reviews will get banned. I'm not joking, I spend a lot of time and work on these articles and do not wish or deserve to be insulted.
sorry if u take that like an insult i didn't mean it sorry again
and yeah i also review games like u do in my country for my friend and yep a really allot of work to do when it's come to review games with thios gpu's just the things that i was afraid of is some problem with the drivers ore other things that give u thoseinformation but don't get me wrong i love when people do this kind of work and i just wanted to make a point of what is going on while comparing the same review with other not wanna put u in any bad situation .
your doing a great job and keep it up
I've just compared the 25x16 Ultra Quality with DDOF FXAA performance from us with theirs, and there is very little difference. You are confused, the GTX 650 Ti you refer to is the yesterday released BOOST edition, as clearly marked in the charts. Not the regular Ti one.
BTW, the next guy that claims we are BIAS to either AMD or NVIDIA, insinuate that we get paid for these reviews will get banned. I'm not joking, I spend a lot of time and work on these articles and do not wish or deserve to be insulted.
sorry if u take that like an insult i didn't mean it sorry again
and yeah i also review games like u do in my country for my friend and yep a really allot of work to do when it's come to review games with thios gpu's just the things that i was afraid of is some problem with the drivers ore other things that give u thoseinformation but don't get me wrong i love when people do this kind of work and i just wanted to make a point of what is going on while comparing the same review with other not wanna put u in any bad situation .
your doing a great job and keep it up
redgreen
Member
Posts: 1
Member
Posts: 1
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:03 PM
Shameless nvidia is cheating in new drivers... They lowered the compute shader precission to FP16, AMD uses FP64, so NV has 4x times worse quality, this is the reason of performance boost in Tomb Raider and Bioshock.
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1039733280&postcount=81
Shameless nvidia is cheating in new drivers... They lowered the compute shader precission to FP16, AMD uses FP64, so NV has 4x times worse quality, this is the reason of performance boost in Tomb Raider and Bioshock.
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1039733280&postcount=81
WhiteLightning
Posts: 27857
Posts: 27857
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:06 PM
Shameless nvidia is cheating in new drivers... They lowered the compute shader precission to FP16, AMD uses FP64, so NV has 4x times worse quality, this is the reason of performance boost in Tomb Raider and Bioshock.
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1039733280&postcount=81
LMAO, quoting the KZ driver guy as refference
Shameless nvidia is cheating in new drivers... They lowered the compute shader precission to FP16, AMD uses FP64, so NV has 4x times worse quality, this is the reason of performance boost in Tomb Raider and Bioshock.
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1039733280&postcount=81
LMAO, quoting the KZ driver guy as refference
CPC_RedDawn
Senior Member
Posts: 7650
Senior Member
Posts: 7650
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:08 PM
Shameless nvidia is cheating in new drivers... They lowered the compute shader precission to FP16, AMD uses FP64, so NV has 4x times worse quality, this is the reason of performance boost in Tomb Raider and Bioshock.
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1039733280&postcount=81
LOL that guy you linked to is an idiot. That was posted in another thread on these forums and it was quickly debunked.
oh and by the way I think its deserved....
Shameless nvidia is cheating in new drivers... They lowered the compute shader precission to FP16, AMD uses FP64, so NV has 4x times worse quality, this is the reason of performance boost in Tomb Raider and Bioshock.
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1039733280&postcount=81
LOL that guy you linked to is an idiot. That was posted in another thread on these forums and it was quickly debunked.
oh and by the way I think its deserved....
THANK YOU & KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK HILBERT!!!
3dPlayer
Senior Member
Posts: 1820
Senior Member
Posts: 1820
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:11 PM
So what does this means?Nvidia has better performance in the last games but with worst IQ?
Is this true?
So what does this means?Nvidia has better performance in the last games but with worst IQ?
Is this true?
IcE
Posts: 10693
Posts: 10693
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:22 PM
So what does this means?Nvidia has better performance in the last games but with worst IQ?
Is this true?
No, it's not, and the guy that claimed it got laughed off hardforum.
So what does this means?Nvidia has better performance in the last games but with worst IQ?
Is this true?
No, it's not, and the guy that claimed it got laughed off hardforum.
---TK---
Senior Member
Posts: 22112
Senior Member
Posts: 22112
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:25 PM
emmmmm okey i believe so but what i see here is a different story look at the gamegpu bench so how can u explain the big difference ? i mean yeah from different hardware and other stuff but i believe the mechanism of the bench are the same as the game have his own bench tool so how i can believe those information ore also if someone ask me are this game a flavor nvidia ore amd (yep some gpu's fanboys ) what is the good answer ? but any way i didn't say he did bad thing just to recheck again and try other settings to see if he ll have the same performance in both nvidia amd !
ps: gamegpu is not a noname site all the bench there are true i did tested allot of latest games with both nvidia /amd , and i can tall u all of those information are true perhaps cpu side I'm not sure bur gpu thing all the information there are true and u can tested by ur self
let me get this straight, you are butthurt that this game seems to favor nvidia hardware?
emmmmm okey i believe so but what i see here is a different story look at the gamegpu bench so how can u explain the big difference ? i mean yeah from different hardware and other stuff but i believe the mechanism of the bench are the same as the game have his own bench tool so how i can believe those information ore also if someone ask me are this game a flavor nvidia ore amd (yep some gpu's fanboys ) what is the good answer ? but any way i didn't say he did bad thing just to recheck again and try other settings to see if he ll have the same performance in both nvidia amd !
ps: gamegpu is not a noname site
all the bench there are true i did tested allot of latest games with both nvidia /amd , and i can tall u all of those information are true perhaps cpu side I'm not sure bur gpu thing all the information there are true and u can tested by ur self let me get this straight, you are butthurt that this game seems to favor nvidia hardware?
---TK---
Senior Member
Posts: 22112
Senior Member
Posts: 22112
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:31 PM
Shameless nvidia is cheating in new drivers... They lowered the compute shader precission to FP16, AMD uses FP64, so NV has 4x times worse quality, this is the reason of performance boost in Tomb Raider and Bioshock.
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1039733280&postcount=81
your quoting the guy that promised a 100% increase in crysis 3 in performance over the regular nvidia driver?
he also promised amd gpu physx as well. lmao
Shameless nvidia is cheating in new drivers... They lowered the compute shader precission to FP16, AMD uses FP64, so NV has 4x times worse quality, this is the reason of performance boost in Tomb Raider and Bioshock.
http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1039733280&postcount=81
your quoting the guy that promised a 100% increase in crysis 3 in performance over the regular nvidia driver?
he also promised amd gpu physx as well. lmao
UZ7
Senior Member
Posts: 5489
Senior Member
Posts: 5489
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:32 PM
Better read about that guy...
He has moded nv driver since years, his word is truer than anybody on pc forums!
Says the guy with 2 posts, same day join date?
Honestly though the game runs super smooth, even runs on my APU powered laptop lol surprisingly. Just hooked on my 360 controller and feels like a console hah.
Better read about that guy...
He has moded nv driver since years, his word is truer than anybody on pc forums!
Says the guy with 2 posts, same day join date?
Honestly though the game runs super smooth, even runs on my APU powered laptop lol surprisingly. Just hooked on my 360 controller and feels like a console hah.
IcE
Posts: 10693
Posts: 10693
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:33 PM
your quoting the guy that promised a 100% increase in crysis 3 in performance over the regular nvidia driver?
he also promised amd gpu physx as well. lmao
Shh, it IS that guy. Obvious troll is obvious.
your quoting the guy that promised a 100% increase in crysis 3 in performance over the regular nvidia driver?
he also promised amd gpu physx as well. lmao
Shh, it IS that guy. Obvious troll is obvious.
---TK---
Senior Member
Posts: 22112
Senior Member
Posts: 22112
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:37 PM
banned based on a post count of 1?
priceless
banned based on a post count of 1?
priceless
---TK---
Senior Member
Posts: 22112
Senior Member
Posts: 22112
Posted on: 03/27/2013 10:38 PM
sorry been at work all day, a little slow today. what a freaken moron
Shh, it IS that guy. Obvious troll is obvious.
sorry been at work all day, a little slow today. what a freaken moron
pages 1 2 3
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 301
nice review thank you