Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review

New Downloads
FurMark Download v1.33.0.0
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4091
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.33.138
CPU-Z download v2.04
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.1.2 (RX 7900) download
GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.0
Download Intel network driver package 27.8
ReShade download v5.6.0
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v2.0.0 Download


New Forum Topics
HYTE Y60 with 3-sided panoramic glass comes in a Snow white editiion AMD Ryzen 7 7700X sees price drop to $299 Microsoft Now Is Proactively Informing Windows 10 users to update to Windows 11 AMD Confirms Strategy of Restraining Chip Supply to Maintain High CPU and GPU Prices Amernime Zone AMD Software: Adrenalin / Pro Driver - Release Discovery 22.12.2 WHQL What reason to go to Windows 11? Samsung Issues new Firmware to prevent Dying 980 Pro SSDs Forspoken Benchmark Test & Performance Analysis Review Netflix threatens to ban customers who share an account unauthorized AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 22.11.2 - Driver download and discussion




Guru3D.com » Review » Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks 5

Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks 5

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 09/06/2018 12:54 PM [ 103 comment(s) ]

In this quick article, we'll check out some graphics cards with Battlefield V Open Beta. The performance is a mixed bag, the however is shaping up to be something really good.

Read article


Advertisement



« MSI MEG X399 Creation review · Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks · Seagate Fast SSD 1TB review »

pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Embra
Senior Member



Posts: 1403
Posted on: 09/06/2018 01:21 PM
Interesting the Vega performance seems lacking at 1080p & 1440p, yet take a jump at 4K.

Thank you HH! :)

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 45550
Posted on: 09/06/2018 01:27 PM
Yeah I know, in its current state it's just so difficult to measure. I've placed many disclaimers in the article, and in fact, have been doubting to even post it as really numbers are all over the place depending on where you are on a map and indeed resolution. Better something than nothing I figured. Once the final game is out I can streamline a good path/scene to measure in, precisely.

These results, I've given it to be a preliminary and indicative classification, not a precise one.

Fox2232
Senior Member



Posts: 11808
Posted on: 09/06/2018 01:38 PM
Yeah I know, in its current state it's just so difficult to measure. I've placed many disclaimers in the article, and in fact, have been doubting to even post it as really numbers are all over the place depending on where you are on a map and indeed resolution. Better something than nothing I figured. Once the final game is out I can streamline a good path/scene to measure in, precisely.

These results, I've given it to be a preliminary and indicative classification, not a precise one.
Not really surprising. In one of dev. team talk they said something weird. That, they have bad performance from using many instantiated objects. And instead they try to combine as much geometry under one instance as possible.

That should not be problem, but it looks like their solution is choking AMD's driver or cards somehow and preventing them from fully utilizing brute part of architecture. That bottleneck is likely "removed" by higher resolution as there is more brute force work required than there is load on bottlenecking serial operation.

May be anything, but my guess would be geometry discard as they make those objects complex.

Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 14010
Posted on: 09/06/2018 01:53 PM
I wonder what it is about Frostbite that makes DX12 such a mess. You'd think the team that requested/helped AMD build an entire low level API would be the best at DX12 and yet they are somehow one of the worst.

I guess we'll see when the final build ships and numbers updated but the performance/stuttering mentioned doesn't look any better than their previous DX12 implementations.

fantaskarsef
Senior Member



Posts: 14161
Posted on: 09/06/2018 02:06 PM
I don't know about DX12 with the Frostbyte engine... I tend to wonder the same as you @Denial , especially as they are actively working together with Nvidia to implement RTX, which is DX12. But to what use if the DX12 adaption itself is lacking? Maybe they should first fix their DX12 "container" itself before thinking about RTX performance numbers, since those are crippled by, well being DX12 on Nvidia and Frostbyte in the first place.

pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Guru3D.com » Articles » Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks 5

Guru3D.com © 2023