Asus ROG Strix XG27UQ review
be quiet! Pure Rock 2 review
Fractal Design Define 7 Compact review
Lian Li Galahad 360 liquid cooler review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - July 2020
Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 3600 MHz (64GB) review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
Kioxia Exceria 960 GB SATA3 SSD review
HP Portable P500 1TB Portable USB3 SSD review
EK-Quantum Magnitude WaterBlock Review
Battlefield 4 VGA graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 10/31/2013 06:43 PM [
106 comment(s) ]
We benchmark Battlefield 4, include FCAT frametime results and have a look at Ultra HD gaming as well. Join us in this article where close to 30 graphics cards are being tested with the new Battlefield 4. After waiting way too long before the game to be unlocked we wanted bring you guys one of our traditional graphics and processor performance articles. As such we'll take a dozen of graphics cards today and have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. The new and popular title is looking great from a graphics point of view. But as a result how will it perform on a selection of different graphics cards ? This review will cover all these basics and then more so you know what choice to make either graphics card or in-game settings wise.
Read article
Advertisement
pages « 3 4 5 6 > »
miffywiffy
Senior Member
Posts: 558
Senior Member
Posts: 558
Posted on: 10/31/2013 08:03 PM
Shame BF is **** these days
Shame BF is **** these days
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 9378
Senior Member
Posts: 9378
Posted on: 10/31/2013 08:05 PM
Ah.. didnt notice the 680. In that case, maybe typo or glitch in the bench?
ah, only just noticed that. weird that the 770 also loses to 680.
Ah.. didnt notice the 680. In that case, maybe typo or glitch in the bench?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38545
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38545
Posted on: 10/31/2013 08:05 PM
I'll have a look at the 680 again tomorrow, could be a typo.
Update: there was a typo in the 770 result (which you compared the 680 to), that has been updated.
Ah.. didnt notice the 680. In that case, maybe typo or glitch in the bench?
I'll have a look at the 680 again tomorrow, could be a typo.
Update: there was a typo in the 770 result (which you compared the 680 to), that has been updated.
scoutingwraith
Senior Member
Posts: 9456
Senior Member
Posts: 9456
Posted on: 10/31/2013 08:16 PM
ah, only just noticed that. weird that the 770 also loses to 680.
One thing. When the 7950 launched, it was roughly on par with the gtx 580. now look at it. the 580 scores 37fps and 7950 62. that's a big difference which happened purely in drivers. (1200p). People saying AMD drivers suck should think again.
Makes me wonder how much do both companies do in terms of driver support for cards that are out on the market and if they are accidentally nerfing them in future release of new cards.
ah, only just noticed that. weird that the 770 also loses to 680.
One thing. When the 7950 launched, it was roughly on par with the gtx 580. now look at it. the 580 scores 37fps and 7950 62. that's a big difference which happened purely in drivers. (1200p). People saying AMD drivers suck should think again.
Makes me wonder how much do both companies do in terms of driver support for cards that are out on the market and if they are accidentally nerfing them in future release of new cards.
pages « 3 4 5 6 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 110
My card (HD 6870) does pretty decently.