Asustor Lockerstor 4 (AS6604T) NAS Review
Hitman III: PC graphics perf benchmark review
TeamGroup CX2 1TB SATA3 SSD review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review
Asustor AS-5102T NAS review





A NAS unit armed with a smooth software DNA and priced competitive against the big guns in the industry like Qnap, Synology and Netgear; a year or two ago Asustor entered the market. We review the AS5102T NAS. We went blank into this review as we never had tested this brand before, but with very good hardware and an excellent software suite the AS5102T is not only a fast file server, it's also loaded with applications, streaming and HTPC functionality as well.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
asustor
« Fractal Design Define S review · Asustor AS-5102T NAS review
· Noctua NH-L9x65 Low Profile CPU cooler review »
pages 1 2
DiceAir
Senior Member
Posts: 1356
Senior Member
Posts: 1356
Posted on: 04/30/2015 10:36 AM
I must running older version as-604T in the office and amazing quality and performance. Wish you guys can review some of the AS70 series for some serious workload. They also added support for Virtualbox so you can run windows, mac and linux in the same box.
I must running older version as-604T in the office and amazing quality and performance. Wish you guys can review some of the AS70 series for some serious workload. They also added support for Virtualbox so you can run windows, mac and linux in the same box.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 40047
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 40047
Posted on: 04/30/2015 11:03 AM
Combine the X and Y axis and you'll understand.
Hilbert, the chart with data size conversion is a little strange. 1 KB = 1024 bytes, but why is 1 MB also 1024(1MB = 1024KB I presume)? Same with MB row and KB and GB columns.
Combine the X and Y axis and you'll understand.
stdavidchen
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Posted on: 04/30/2015 01:25 PM
I jumped directly to check the conclusion and 100 Mb/sec is really scaring me ....
Check back page of "NAS performance", I think it should be 100MB/sec, right?
With large files and a fast enough HDD over a Gigabit connection you will reach 100 Mb/sec on read and writes, likely even higher. So for this type of connection, really it can hardly go any faster.
I jumped directly to check the conclusion and 100 Mb/sec is really scaring me ....
Check back page of "NAS performance", I think it should be 100MB/sec, right?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 40047
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 40047
Posted on: 04/30/2015 02:05 PM
Definitely, let me fix that.
Definitely, let me fix that.
pages 1 2
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 151
Hilbert, the chart with data size conversion is a little strange. 1 KB = 1024 bytes, but why is 1 MB also 1024(1MB = 1024KB I presume)? Same with MB row and KB and GB columns.