AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review
PowerColor 5700 RED DEVIL review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT ROG STRIX review
ViewSonic Elite XG240R Monitor Review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
X570 Aorus master review
Cooler Master Silencio S600 review
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G review
ASUS RoG Swift PG35VQ Monitor review
Asustor AS-5102T NAS review
Posted by: on: 04/30/2015 09:32 AM [
8 comment(s) ]
A NAS unit armed with a smooth software DNA and priced competitive against the big guns in the industry like Qnap, Synology and Netgear; a year or two ago Asustor entered the market. We review the AS5102T NAS. We went blank into this review as we never had tested this brand before, but with very good hardware and an excellent software suite the AS5102T is not only a fast file server, it's also loaded with applications, streaming and HTPC functionality as well.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
asustor
DiceAir
Senior Member
Posts: 1349
Senior Member
Posts: 1349
Posted on: 04/30/2015 11:36 AM
I must running older version as-604T in the office and amazing quality and performance. Wish you guys can review some of the AS70 series for some serious workload. They also added support for Virtualbox so you can run windows, mac and linux in the same box.
I must running older version as-604T in the office and amazing quality and performance. Wish you guys can review some of the AS70 series for some serious workload. They also added support for Virtualbox so you can run windows, mac and linux in the same box.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35685
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35685
Posted on: 04/30/2015 12:03 PM
Combine the X and Y axis and you'll understand.
Hilbert, the chart with data size conversion is a little strange. 1 KB = 1024 bytes, but why is 1 MB also 1024(1MB = 1024KB I presume)? Same with MB row and KB and GB columns.
Combine the X and Y axis and you'll understand.
stdavidchen
Junior Member
Posts: 18
Junior Member
Posts: 18
Posted on: 04/30/2015 02:25 PM
I jumped directly to check the conclusion and 100 Mb/sec is really scaring me ....
Check back page of "NAS performance", I think it should be 100MB/sec, right?
With large files and a fast enough HDD over a Gigabit connection you will reach 100 Mb/sec on read and writes, likely even higher. So for this type of connection, really it can hardly go any faster.
I jumped directly to check the conclusion and 100 Mb/sec is really scaring me ....
Check back page of "NAS performance", I think it should be 100MB/sec, right?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35685
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35685
Posted on: 04/30/2015 03:05 PM
Definitely, let me fix that.
Definitely, let me fix that.
shymi
Senior Member
Posts: 150
Senior Member
Posts: 150
Posted on: 05/01/2015 10:39 AM
I see, so it's on purpose not unidirectional conversion in the whole table.
So for the KB row it is:
KB -> B
KB -> KB(1 here)
KB <- MB
KB <- GB
Need more coffee before posting. Sorry about the previous comment
Combine the X and Y axis and you'll understand.
I see, so it's on purpose not unidirectional conversion in the whole table.
So for the KB row it is:
KB -> B
KB -> KB(1 here)
KB <- MB
KB <- GB
Need more coffee before posting. Sorry about the previous comment
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 5866
Senior Member
Posts: 5866
Posted on: 05/01/2015 12:42 PM
Looks cool. How much is it, though? Couldn't see a price anywhere.
Looks cool. How much is it, though? Couldn't see a price anywhere.
TheSarge
Senior Member
Posts: 803
Senior Member
Posts: 803
Posted on: 05/02/2015 04:47 AM
Wow, that is a serious little machine. I don't need anything like that but if I did then I might want this.
Wow, that is a serious little machine. I don't need anything like that but if I did then I might want this.
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 150
Hilbert, the chart with data size conversion is a little strange. 1 KB = 1024 bytes, but why is 1 MB also 1024(1MB = 1024KB I presume)? Same with MB row and KB and GB columns.