Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review
MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT GAMING X TRIO review
Guru3D Q1 Winter 20/21 PC Buyer Guide

New Downloads
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5640 beta
CrystalDiskInfo 8.11.2 Download
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.3 driver download
GPU-Z Download v2.37.0
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH27.20.100.9313
HWiNFO Download v6.43 - 4380 Beta
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.2 driver download
3DMark Download v2.17.7137 + Time Spy


New Forum Topics
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is a yes, 6700 is a no ... 2700X to 5600X worth it? GeForce 461.72 WHQL drivers: download & discussion Sony Preps New Firmware - PlayStation 5 Storage Can Be Upgraded in Summer Diablo 2 Resurrected PC requirements Need help with HPET Judge orders Valve to hand over Steam data MOSFET prices to increase on worsening component shortages How Do I Load a Saved Profile on New PC? Resizable Bar?




Guru3D.com » Review » ASUS TUF X470 Plus-Gaming review 4

ASUS TUF X470 Plus-Gaming review 4

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/24/2018 09:56 AM [ 9 comment(s) ]

We review the ASUS TUF X470 Plus-Gaming, optimized for Ryzen 2000 / Zen+ on a motherboard with an ATX form factor. Alongside the release of Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 7 2700X processors, AMD prepped the X470 chipset, that offers a more fine-tuned experience for your Ryzen processor. The new board offers is more appealing budget wise as it is selling at a 159,- USD/EUR price point.

Read article


Advertisement



Tagged as: asus, ryzen

« TeamGroup T-Force VULCAN TUF DDR4 3200 MHz review · ASUS TUF X470 Plus-Gaming review · Cooler Master MasterCase H500M review »

pages 1 2

Humanoid_1
Senior Member



Posts: 960
Posted on: 07/24/2018 11:34 AM
As HH touched on this board really is poorly equipped with what is actually the same 4+2 phase supply used on the earlier 350 boards. Those board's VRMs could overheat significantly on a 1700 overclocked running a heavy workload. buildzoid registered temps of 127c in such situations. Combine that with the 2700x being capable of pulling significantly more power in standard configs to the older gen chips and this really does not equate to a power supply setup for a X470 branded board, especially one holding the TUF branding. A very poor move by Asus.

I liked his conclusion - Avoid like the plague...

Obviously if you want to run a lower end Ryzen+ CPU with lower power consumption requirements then this board should be adequate, but you are still paying (lowish) x470 prices for what is Really a 450 board.

(edited for a typo)

cryohellinc
Senior Member



Posts: 3348
Posted on: 07/24/2018 11:35 AM
Nice review @Hilbert Hagedoorn and spot-on recommendations.

BLEH!
Senior Member



Posts: 6049
Posted on: 07/24/2018 12:05 PM
That's a fair conclusion. I thought the back panel was a bit bare, personally, like to see more USB than that.

Jonathanese
Member



Posts: 30
Posted on: 07/24/2018 03:26 PM
I had the Z370 version of this board. ASUS makes a great BIOS for overclocking, but they just cut back wayyy too much on the VRMs. At stock clocks with high load-line calibration, I was already seeing the CPU throttle because of VRM temperatures. That simply shouldn't be happening that easily. My 8700K would see ~130W in Prime, but would just keep climbing to over 200W.

I ended up returning it and getting an ASRock Extreme 4 which certainly has a more difficult overclocking interface, but the VRM setup is far more robust. I have a probe between the heatsink and the thermal pad on my VRMs and rarely see it hit 55C. At a 5.2GHz overclock at 1.4v no less. My power usage hangs out at about 170W and doesn't climb.

So the TUF series isn't exactly "TUF". It's a great board for running things stock, or perhaps overclocking 6-core i5s or 4-core i7s. But it feels like they were hoping people wouldn't notice where they cut corners.

Aesthetically, I actually really liked it. Sort of a classic "factory" look that some might find cheesy, but I thought looked pretty good alongside the cleaner look of modern pc components.

undorich
Member



Posts: 32
Posted on: 07/24/2018 06:51 PM
You get six power phases, -- no way ! looks like a stock 4+2





pages 1 2

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Guru3D.com » Articles » ASUS TUF X470 Plus-Gaming review 4

Guru3D.com © 2021