Watch Dogs: Legion PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X TRIO review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3070 TUF Gaming review
Radeon Series RX 6800 (XT) and 6900 XT preview & analysis
ASUS TUF LC240 RGB LCS review
GeForce RTX 3070 Founder edition review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - October 2020
Corsair 4000D PC Chassis Review
TeamGroup EX2 SSD 1TB review
Deepcool AS500 air cooler review
Asus ROG Strix XG27UQ review
Posted by: on: 08/07/2020 01:12 PM [
88 comment(s) ]
In this review, we look at the ROG Strix XG27UQ, and what a fantastic product we test today. In specifications and quality I mean, as the ROG Strix XG27UQ is a 27" Ultra HD slash HDR rated monitor. This 3840x2160 pixels monitor can handle 144Hz combined with GSYNC and is a DCS monitor, and that means no chroma subsampling issues.
Read article
Advertisement
pages « < 15 16 17 18
yasamoka
Senior Member
Posts: 4836
Senior Member
Posts: 4836
Posted on: 08/17/2020 10:45 PM
You were wrong, had no idea what you were talking about, and are now trying to divert attention. Accept you were wrong and move on.
You were wrong, had no idea what you were talking about, and are now trying to divert attention. Accept you were wrong and move on.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 3864
Senior Member
Posts: 3864
Posted on: 08/18/2020 09:32 AM
I have explained myself enough, sorry that is not good enough for you to understand.
ON TOPIC:
Where are all of the 1.6:1 ratio monitors?
You were wrong, had no idea what you were talking about, and are now trying to divert attention. Accept you were wrong and move on.
I have explained myself enough, sorry that is not good enough for you to understand.
ON TOPIC:
Where are all of the 1.6:1 ratio monitors?
pages « < 15 16 17 18
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 3864
You fine gentlemen can just message one another instead of trying to talk behind my back! Also, if you do not reply to me, or quote me, I'll never know you are talking about me. I do have some people banned on here, because I got tired of getting the last word with them, I don't want to add more haters
What began my comments:
And dlss is lossless upscaling...
Yeah, im gonna skip on everything that aint raw native image.
Dragam1337 is making what I think is a valid statement of preference in that they do not want anything unless it is RAW. That is their preference, and the reply came as:
Why are you even mentioning DLSS in this context?
So, Richto steps into the ring and says a valid statement, but the wording was not entirely correct, so I pushed for citation:
Better not play any computer or console games at all then because they will all have compressed graphics assets and video.
DSC has no visible picture impact.
At this point, I'm thinking "wait...that doesn't quite sound correct...I'm gonna need a citation, because AFAIK that is like two steps of image manipulation..."
Hmm, gonna need a citation on that.
Compression is compression. If you are compressing something that is already compressed...
So, the key point I made here (and I used the operative IF) is that compressing something that is already compressed (in the above spat), leads to lower quality, so if there is something in these two methods that does not lead to artefacts, I'd like to know what it is.
It was a very big
And then...dear lord...
...Then someone started talking about loseless compression, for some reason, and bifurcated the discussion - and yet, no one wanted to talk about the aspect ratio! which tbh, is the only true thing I care about in the monitor discussion...!
I ask again: is this clear enough now? Do I need to re-re-re-re-re-explain my point? Surely this is enough for you to understand now?