be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Asus ROG Strix XG27UQ review
Posted by: on: 08/07/2020 02:12 PM [
87 comment(s) ]
In this review, we look at the ROG Strix XG27UQ, and what a fantastic product we test today. In specifications and quality I mean, as the ROG Strix XG27UQ is a 27" Ultra HD slash HDR rated monitor. This 3840x2160 pixels monitor can handle 144Hz combined with GSYNC and is a DCS monitor, and that means no chroma subsampling issues.
Read article
Advertisement
pages « < 13 14 15 16 > »
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 4800
Senior Member
Posts: 4800
Posted on: 08/15/2020 12:21 PM
Stop trying to redefine what compression is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictionary-coder
Next you'll be telling us that NTFS and Xpress16k aren't compression.
After much reading of the links people have given here (thx to all), there is nothing that invalidates my position.
Compression removes data, and therefore data is lost.
Decompression replaces it, and therefore the lost data is reconstructed.
I thank you for the links, I really do, but...lossless compression/destructive transcoding still loses data when it is destroyed, the fact it is virtually reconstructed when decompressed was never my point. My point stops at the point you compress. When you decompress - that is when your point becomes relevant.
Clear?
ninja edit: My other point for which no one has answered yet, is about the 1.6:1 ratio monitors, where are they?
Stop trying to redefine what compression is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictionary-coder
Next you'll be telling us that NTFS and Xpress16k aren't compression.
After much reading of the links people have given here (thx to all), there is nothing that invalidates my position.
Compression removes data, and therefore data is lost.
Decompression replaces it, and therefore the lost data is reconstructed.
I thank you for the links, I really do, but...lossless compression/destructive transcoding still loses data when it is destroyed, the fact it is virtually reconstructed when decompressed was never my point. My point stops at the point you compress. When you decompress - that is when your point becomes relevant.
Clear?
ninja edit: My other point for which no one has answered yet, is about the 1.6:1 ratio monitors, where are they?
itpro
Senior Member
Posts: 1361
Senior Member
Posts: 1361
Posted on: 08/15/2020 01:27 PM
There is nothing wrong so you cannot call any defection with the whole situation nothing is lost. We do not understand your point. Next time when I go to supermarket I will not remove my products from cart to bag because they will be compressed and decompressed at home.
There is nothing wrong so you cannot call any defection with the whole situation nothing is lost. We do not understand your point. Next time when I go to supermarket I will not remove my products from cart to bag because they will be compressed and decompressed at home.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 4800
Senior Member
Posts: 4800
Posted on: 08/15/2020 07:56 PM
You speak for yourself, and that's fine. I've said what I came to say, and that's that - but I would like to know if there are any points to made regarding aspect ratios for computer monitors?
There is nothing wrong so you cannot call any defection with the whole situation nothing is lost. We do not understand your point. Next time when I go to supermarket I will not remove my products from cart to bag because they will be compressed and decompressed at home.
You speak for yourself, and that's fine. I've said what I came to say, and that's that - but I would like to know if there are any points to made regarding aspect ratios for computer monitors?
Deleted member 213629
Unregistered
Unregistered
Posted on: 08/15/2020 07:56 PM
I remember getting in trouble for doing this. Think the last time this happened I was like 7 or 9? lol...
Can it be less cringe-worthy in the future? This is becoming a habit
Stop trying to redefine things because you don't comprehend them.
I remember getting in trouble for doing this. Think the last time this happened I was like 7 or 9? lol...
You speak for yourself, and that's fine. I've said what I came to say, and that's that
Can it be less cringe-worthy in the future? This is becoming a habit
pages « < 13 14 15 16 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 13633
Stop trying to redefine what compression is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictionary-coder
Next you'll be telling us that NTFS and Xpress16k aren't compression.