Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
ASUS GeForce GTX 1070 STRIX Gaming review
Posted by: on: 08/18/2016 08:37 AM [
22 comment(s) ]
We review the ASUS GeForce GTX 1070 STRIX GAMING. It's factory customized and comes all tweaked and cooled so much better opposed to the founders edition. And it looks fantastic as well. Join me in a review of this 8 GB card from ASUS.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 5
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 46372
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 46372
Posted on: 08/18/2016 01:30 PM
Page 11
HH, wondering about something. Why don't you include other aftermarket graphic cards in your graphs? It's evident that aftermarket cards are better in every aspect than vanilla/founders but the difference between for example a Strix and Gaming X card can be more interesting when someone is shopping for a new card.
We did that throughout all charts. However new drivers are posted nearly on a weekly basis these days. These driver changes can have the effect of a product getting a frame or two faster and sometimes slower. If a slower card all of the sudden is 1~2 FPS ahead all hell breaks loose in these forums and suddenly I have a brand bias.
I am however working towards adding a competitive product chart with just 3DMark GPU scores so you guys can compare a bit better.
Page 11
HH, wondering about something. Why don't you include other aftermarket graphic cards in your graphs? It's evident that aftermarket cards are better in every aspect than vanilla/founders but the difference between for example a Strix and Gaming X card can be more interesting when someone is shopping for a new card.
We did that throughout all charts. However new drivers are posted nearly on a weekly basis these days. These driver changes can have the effect of a product getting a frame or two faster and sometimes slower. If a slower card all of the sudden is 1~2 FPS ahead all hell breaks loose in these forums and suddenly I have a brand bias.
I am however working towards adding a competitive product chart with just 3DMark GPU scores so you guys can compare a bit better.
Netherwind
Senior Member
Posts: 8537
Senior Member
Posts: 8537
Posted on: 08/18/2016 01:33 PM
We did that throughout all charts. However new drivers are posted nearly on a weekly basis these days. These driver changes can have the effect of a product getting a frame or two faster and sometimes slower. If a slower card all of the sudden is 1~2 FPS ahead all hell breaks loose in these forums and suddenly I have a brand bias.
I am however working towards adding a competitive product chart with just 3DMark GPU scores so you guys can compare a bit better.
I was thinking more about things like temps/noise. So every time a new card is tested, it would battle against those that you've already tested.
We did that throughout all charts. However new drivers are posted nearly on a weekly basis these days. These driver changes can have the effect of a product getting a frame or two faster and sometimes slower. If a slower card all of the sudden is 1~2 FPS ahead all hell breaks loose in these forums and suddenly I have a brand bias.
I am however working towards adding a competitive product chart with just 3DMark GPU scores so you guys can compare a bit better.
I was thinking more about things like temps/noise. So every time a new card is tested, it would battle against those that you've already tested.
fOrTy_7
Senior Member
Posts: 345
Senior Member
Posts: 345
Posted on: 08/18/2016 01:34 PM
I don't get the point why you compare custom branded usually overclocked models with reference models.
At least add other custom models of the same brand to the performance charts when you review rebranded graphic cards, like in this case it would be Asus STRIX 1080, 980Ti, 980 and so on.
I don't get the point why you compare custom branded usually overclocked models with reference models.
At least add other custom models of the same brand to the performance charts when you review rebranded graphic cards, like in this case it would be Asus STRIX 1080, 980Ti, 980 and so on.
TeX_UK
Senior Member
Posts: 1951
Senior Member
Posts: 1951
Posted on: 08/18/2016 01:36 PM
Thanks, great review as usual HH .
Thanks, great review as usual HH
.pages 1 2 3 4 5
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 8537
Page 11
HH, wondering about something. Why don't you include other aftermarket graphic cards in your graphs? It's evident that aftermarket cards are better in every aspect than vanilla/founders but the difference between for example a Strix and Gaming X card can be more interesting when someone is shopping for a new card.