Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Asustor Lockerstor 4 (AS6604T) NAS Review
Hitman III: PC graphics perf benchmark review
TeamGroup CX2 1TB SATA3 SSD review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review

New Downloads
GeForce 461.40 WHQL driver download
HWiNFO Download v6.42
Prime95 download version 30.4 build 8
CrystalDiskInfo 8.10.0 Download
SiSoft Sandra 20/20 download v30.92
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.1.1 driver download
CPU-Z download v1.95
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9168
GeForce 461.33 hotfix driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5620 beta


New Forum Topics
The Medium: Game Performance Below 60 FPS even at 1920x1080 / RTX 3080 ROG Strix SCAR 17 with the latest AMD Ryzen processors and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 graphics New Gigabyte Z390 BAR bios added Specifications K-Model Rocket Lake processors have surfaced Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.1.1 Download & Discussion RTSS 6.7.0 beta 1 Vulkan Beta Driver Intel Shows Xe HPC Multi-Chip Module Die New Ryzen system very weird problems with RAM and XMP TSMC to make 3nm chips for Intel in 2020




Guru3D.com » Review » Assassins Creed: Valhalla graphics perf benchmark review 5

Assassins Creed: Valhalla graphics perf benchmark review 5

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/12/2020 01:32 PM [ 110 comment(s) ]

It's a bit of a feast for the eyes, yes we'll check it out in a PC graphics performance and PC gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative to graphics card performance with the latest AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards. Many graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. 

Read article


Advertisement



« Mountain Makalu 67 mouse review · Assassins Creed: Valhalla graphics perf benchmark review · EK AIO Elite 360 D-RGB review »

pages « 2 3 4 5 > »

Dragam1337
Senior Member



Posts: 2337
Posted on: 11/12/2020 02:35 PM
2560x1440 all ultra settings and 100% res scale, I have 75 average fps on 2080ti with drops to 60 fps in cities.
Surprising to see how well 5700 XT is doing here, I wonder how well will 6800 XT perform then..

6800 xt will perform worse the higher the res, due to the 256 bit bus and "only" having regular gddr6. So it will hit it out of the ballpark at 1080p, and likely be somewhat slower than the 3090 and possibly 3080 at 4k.

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 40050
Posted on: 11/12/2020 02:39 PM
6800 xt will perform worse the higher the res, due to the 256 bit bus and "only" having regular gddr6. So it will hit it out of the ballpark at 1080p, and likely be somewhat slower than the 3090 and possibly 3080 at 4k.


:) Not saying a thing here, but sometimes I am so proud of the Guru3D community.

JonasBeckman
Senior Member



Posts: 17285
Posted on: 11/12/2020 02:56 PM
6800 xt will perform worse the higher the res, due to the 256 bit bus and "only" having regular gddr6. So it will hit it out of the ballpark at 1080p, and likely be somewhat slower than the 3090 and possibly 3080 at 4k.


Wonder what the infinity fabric and a 300 or higher bus width could do, sure there's full 512-bit but then it's all complicated due to pricing and what not in turn although combining the full thing of these together would have been interesting to see although a 384 or what's it called 448 bit bus might have been the top if AMD was going that far for the enthusiast model as I don't believe AMD has gone 512-bit since the attempts with this ring-bus and the 290 GPU model.

Add a HBM2E type memory while thinking about something that won't happen best case is that AMD maybe uses this for the professional GPU lineup which I think is the rumored CDNA architecture replacing GCN, eventually.
A bit under a week for reviews for these though, some good more demanding titles for testing them too. :D

EDIT: Suppose GDDR6 and even GDDR6X has a range of speeds available plus improvements since the initial use on GPU's but I don't think AMD would be using the top-end chips same as NVIDIA likely isn't using the fastest GDDR6X modules at least for now.

Just goes back to what benchmark results will be and then overclocking results if there's any headroom for long-term general stability when pushing the stock speeds higher.
Was a bit iffy for the 5000 series due to the VRAM chips and then a mix between Samsung and Hynix I think it was here plus the memory controller and how the GPU handled that all.
(Not well at all until 19.8.1 from what I recall and then various issues since with how sensitive these are.)

H83
Senior Member



Posts: 3345
Posted on: 11/12/2020 03:01 PM
:) Not saying a thing here, but sometimes I am so proud of the Guru3D community.


This almost seems like an hint for the upcoming review of the 6000 series... :eek:

Supertribble
Senior Member



Posts: 868
Posted on: 11/12/2020 03:02 PM
AMD have sponsored Ubisoft titles in the past with no obvious indication that their cards performed abnormally better than Nvidia but the sponsorship seems to have, belatedly, paid off. Nvidia cards are struggling here, and the performance the 5700XT is putting out bodes will for the 6000 series.

pages « 2 3 4 5 > »

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Guru3D.com » Articles » Assassins Creed: Valhalla graphics perf benchmark review 5

Guru3D.com © 2021