Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Hitman III: PC graphics perf benchmark review
TeamGroup CX2 1TB SATA3 SSD review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review
Corsair HS70 Bluetooth Headset Review

New Downloads
Prime95 download version 30.4 build 8
CrystalDiskInfo 8.10.0 Download
SiSoft Sandra 20/20 download v30.92
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.1.1 driver download
CPU-Z download v1.95
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9168
HWiNFO Download v6.41 (4355 Beta)
GeForce 461.33 hotfix driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5620 beta
3DMark Download v2.16.7117 + Time Spy


New Forum Topics
Weird 5700 XT problem Cougar launches AURIC, Semi-fanless GOLD power supply wit aRGB RTSS 6.7.0 beta 1 ¿how to force windows restart when gpu_use is in idle or...? Meet the Cooler Master MasterCase 700 GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 Hall Of Fame (HOF) PCB photos GeForce Hotfix Driver Version 461.33 SilverStone NJ700 power supply unit with a capacity of 700W is fanless Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.1.1 Download & Discussion Ryzen 5800X performance




Guru3D.com » Review » AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review 5

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review 5

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/15/2019 02:40 PM [ 91 comment(s) ]

The review today hardly will need an introduction, the monolith has arrived, the consumer, and not even HEDT, the sixteen-core processor in the Ryzen 3000 family, the Ryzen 9 3950X. It is fast, feisty, agile and even affordable. Join us in a review of the Ryzen 9 3950X processor. 

Read article


Advertisement



Tagged as: amd, ryzen

« Crucial X8 1TB Portable SSD review · AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review · Intel Core i9 9900KS processor review »

pages « 2 3 4 5 > »

Kaleid
Senior Member



Posts: 2568
Posted on: 11/14/2019 05:19 PM
I don't really think a CPU costing $750, can be considered 'for the masses'.


Nope, but on the other hand it has never been this cheap either.

Personally I know I have no use for it.

kakiharaFRS
Senior Member



Posts: 538
Posted on: 11/14/2019 05:21 PM
Beast!
I wonder why it isn't quite as good in gaming when it beats or matches the 9900k in most synthetic single-threaded tests?
despite what you read here and there, a lot of games still care more about clock speed than threads or cores, that's why
I've made my own benchmarks overclocking and downclocking my 9900k (to see what I should expect switching to AMD) some games don't care much but in some you lose a good 20fps
hey going to see how Borderlands 3 behaves since it's one of the most demanding recent games for me (with an acceptable quality/performance ratio) brb ^^

Solfaur
Senior Member



Posts: 7440
Posted on: 11/14/2019 05:24 PM
Beast!

I wonder why it isn't quite as good in gaming when it beats or matches the 9900k in most synthetic single-threaded tests?

From what I gathered it's first and foremost because Intel and the many "sandy bridge" iterations and refinements have been out for so long, and have been the standard for developers, and are therefore used to that architecture and its strong points, that it will take a while before they catch up with AMD's. The gap has shrunk with each Ryzen generation and I'm sure 2 years from now it will be even smaller or go in AMDs favor in many games. That and the fact that raw boost clocks on 9900K are simply higher (but at the same time equally hotter too).

As a gamer primarily, I would still advice people to go for AMD this time around, even if it's not the king in gaming, it's better bang for your buck, better future-proof, a whole lot cooler and unless you game at 1080p, the difference at higher resolutions as HH pointed out, is even less significant anyway.

Now talking about the 3950X, even though it's definitely out of my price range, I have to admit I am a bit jelly that it gets a 4.7 max single core boost over my 3900X's 4.6. But at the same time, it's is a (small) perk the top of the line CPU, well, the X570 line at least, definitely deservers. :p

MonstroMart
Senior Member



Posts: 839
Posted on: 11/14/2019 05:31 PM
From what I gathered it's first and foremost because Intel and the many "sandy bridge" iterations and refinements have been out for so long, and have been the standard for developers, and are therefore used to that architecture and its strong points, that it will take a while before they catch up with AMD's. The gap has shrunk with each Ryzen generation and I'm sure 2 years from now it will be even smaller or go in AMDs favor in many games. That and the fact that raw boost clocks on 9900K are simply higher (but at the same time equally hotter too).

As a gamer primarily, I would still advice people to go for AMD this time around, even if it's not the king in gaming, it's better bang for your buck, better future-proof, a whole lot cooler and unless you game at 1080p, the difference at higher resolutions as HH pointed out, is even less significant anyway.

Now talking about the 3950X, even though it's definitely out of my price range, I have to admit I am a bit jelly that it gets a 4.7 max single core boost over my 3900X's 4.6. But at the same time, it's is a (small) perk the top of the line CPU, well, the X570 line at least, definitely deservers. :p

Personally if i would care about games only and would spend 500$ on a new CPU it would be the 9900k. But i would definitely avoid the current i5 9600k at all cost. I don't think under 8 threads will cut it 2-3 years from now in the most demanding new titles. The 7600k is aging badly and i think the same will eventually happen to the 9600k.

Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 13234
Posted on: 11/14/2019 05:35 PM
I have to admit I am a bit jelly that it gets a 4.7 max single core boost over my 3900X's 4.6. But at the same time, it's is a (small) perk the top of the line CPU, well, the X570 line at least, definitely deservers.


Both Anandtech and GN's processor wouldn't hit 4.7 - maxed out at 4.65 -- likewise my 3900x doesn't hit 4.6, maxes out 50mhz shy as well.

They should have just said the max for these two processors were 4.5 and 4.6.

Looks like it performs well and the price/perf, especially in multithreaded workloads is insane.

pages « 2 3 4 5 > »

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Guru3D.com » Articles » AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review 5

Guru3D.com © 2021