MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X TRIO review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3070 TUF Gaming review
Radeon Series RX 6800 (XT) and 6900 XT preview & analysis
ASUS TUF LC240 RGB LCS review
GeForce RTX 3070 Founder edition review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - October 2020
Corsair 4000D PC Chassis Review
TeamGroup EX2 SSD 1TB review
Deepcool AS500 air cooler review
Leven JS600 1 TB SATA3 SSD review
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT review
Posted by: on: 07/07/2020 02:00 PM [
64 comment(s) ]
We review the new XT model Ryzen 9 3900XT. Released by AMD as a respin of the 3900X model, the XT processors are optimized to bring a bit more bite in single-threaded and medium threaded workloads.
Read article
Advertisement
pages « < 6 7 8 9 > »
H83
Senior Member
Posts: 3199
Senior Member
Posts: 3199
Posted on: 07/07/2020 10:48 PM
A strange and useless release these XT versions, they add very little performance and are much more expensive than the non XT parts. And to make things worse, Ryzen 3 is on track for a release near the end of the year...
A strange and useless release these XT versions, they add very little performance and are much more expensive than the non XT parts. And to make things worse, Ryzen 3 is on track for a release near the end of the year...
Mineria
Senior Member
Posts: 4158
Senior Member
Posts: 4158
Posted on: 07/08/2020 01:07 AM
and if you need high framerates in gaming take a 3600XT or a maybe more expensive Intel setup depending on the CPU that is chosen.
Cheers, TJ
Doesn't need to get more expensive with Intel, a 10600K will do fine.
and if you need high framerates in gaming take a 3600XT or a maybe more expensive Intel setup depending on the CPU that is chosen.
Cheers, TJ
Doesn't need to get more expensive with Intel, a 10600K will do fine.
barbacot
Senior Member
Posts: 442
Senior Member
Posts: 442
Posted on: 07/08/2020 03:14 AM
Actually 3900XT is not the same price like 3900X even in the ideal case of no price increase at the shops because the "X" version comes with a wraith spire cooler while the "XT" version comes empty so you have to buy a cooling solution which adds to the price.
I also don't think that they merit a "recommended" award - let's be serious...they merit a "skip this" award - X marks the spot, not XT or wait for ZEN 3.
All at the same price as the original X series product
Actually 3900XT is not the same price like 3900X even in the ideal case of no price increase at the shops because the "X" version comes with a wraith spire cooler while the "XT" version comes empty so you have to buy a cooling solution which adds to the price.
I also don't think that they merit a "recommended" award - let's be serious...they merit a "skip this" award - X marks the spot, not XT or wait for ZEN 3.
kakiharaFRS
Senior Member
Posts: 473
Senior Member
Posts: 473
Posted on: 07/08/2020 07:04 AM
you know I went back to a 9900k for a gaming computer (2nd 9900k in my hands) that one is one of the latest boxed cpus sold, while my old one was a "day1 availability" tray cpu...the last one is awful, impossible to get it running at 5.0 all cores with less than 1.4v with the 90+°C and around 200watts that go with it when my early "tray" can do 5.1@1.36v (180watts) or 5.0@1.26v (140watts) no problems
I had seen DerBauer video about 10900k binning but watching a video and experiencing the giant gap between two "same" cpus was eye opening, I now understand why people spit on Intel...I got lucky apparently with my 1st cpu, my view of Intel gaming lineup wouldn't have been the same if I had way higher power usage (and the heat !) as a 1st experience, AMD seems to go the same way with that XT line I would not want more watts for 100Mhz it changes nothing in most uses (I run 3960x 4.3Ghz@1.28v or 4.15Ghz@1.24v both of which are way cooler than the idiotic 1.46 I sometimes get at default settings)
I'm starting to think you're better off buying early :/
In all honesty these XT Cpus dont really bring anything good. One can see well in the 3800xt review, that the 3800xt is bad chip and the 3800x from the old review was better. Since the Power Usage is way higher on the 3800xt MT and the OC is not rly possible. And on all three reviews you can see that MT power usage is way higher on the XT parts as compared to the X parts, whilst the Performance is basically the same...
you know I went back to a 9900k for a gaming computer (2nd 9900k in my hands) that one is one of the latest boxed cpus sold, while my old one was a "day1 availability" tray cpu...the last one is awful, impossible to get it running at 5.0 all cores with less than 1.4v with the 90+°C and around 200watts that go with it when my early "tray" can do 5.1@1.36v (180watts) or 5.0@1.26v (140watts) no problems
I had seen DerBauer video about 10900k binning but watching a video and experiencing the giant gap between two "same" cpus was eye opening, I now understand why people spit on Intel...I got lucky apparently with my 1st cpu, my view of Intel gaming lineup wouldn't have been the same if I had way higher power usage (and the heat !) as a 1st experience, AMD seems to go the same way with that XT line I would not want more watts for 100Mhz it changes nothing in most uses (I run 3960x 4.3Ghz@1.28v or 4.15Ghz@1.24v both of which are way cooler than the idiotic 1.46 I sometimes get at default settings)
I'm starting to think you're better off buying early :/
pages « < 6 7 8 9 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 248
I really disagree with the Recommended award. Such a pitiful increase in performance for so much more money... and heat.