EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review
Corsair HS70 Bluetooth Headset Review
MSI MEG X570 Unify review
Scythe Ninja 5 air cooler review
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 review
Posted by: on: 06/13/2017 06:01 AM [
37 comment(s) ]
It is quad-core time with the Ryzen 5 1400 (without the X). The 1400 will be tested and overclocked to see how much value you can squeeze out of this four-core and and eight-threaded processor.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
kapu
Senior Member
Posts: 4308
Senior Member
Posts: 4308
Posted on: 06/13/2017 07:45 AM
Holy crap , it matches 6600K .. Really nice performance.
But we need results of i5 7600k and i5 7500, why no such results Hilbert ?
i5 7500 is priced 20 euro more in Poland and it is direct competition.
Holy crap , it matches 6600K .. Really nice performance.
But we need results of i5 7600k and i5 7500, why no such results Hilbert ?
i5 7500 is priced 20 euro more in Poland and it is direct competition.
jdc2389
Senior Member
Posts: 186
Senior Member
Posts: 186
Posted on: 06/13/2017 08:08 AM
Please add the gaming benchmark results at the overclocked 3.9 Hilbert! Thanks for the review.
Please add the gaming benchmark results at the overclocked 3.9 Hilbert! Thanks for the review.
AndyMutz
Senior Member
Posts: 313
Senior Member
Posts: 313
Posted on: 06/13/2017 08:10 AM
was i lucky with my chip?
mine 1400 does 3900 MHz at 1,33v on a gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3.
4000 MHz ran unstable at 1,35v and i did not want to go higher with the voltage.
-andy-
was i lucky with my chip?
mine 1400 does 3900 MHz at 1,33v on a gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3.
4000 MHz ran unstable at 1,35v and i did not want to go higher with the voltage.
-andy-
Guru3dreader
Member
Posts: 28
Member
Posts: 28
Posted on: 06/13/2017 08:32 AM
CPU-Z benchmark is a joke. I wouldn't give it even a line in a review, not a whole page. Are we going back to the times where people where using SuperPi to check performance? Especially those times when slower Intel processors where finishing it much faster?
CPU-Z benchmark is a joke. I wouldn't give it even a line in a review, not a whole page. Are we going back to the times where people where using SuperPi to check performance? Especially those times when slower Intel processors where finishing it much faster?
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 85
Nice review and a good budget chip, but I agree with the summary that the age of quad core processors is drawing to an end.
@Hilbert is there any chance you will be doing a more in depth article about memory speeds on AGESA 1.0.0.6? It would be great to see how far the speeds can be pushed using a few different configurations of both single and double DDR4 DIMMs in both 2 and 4 stick setups.