Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
G.Skill TridentZ Royal Elite DDR4 3600 MHz CL14 review
Corsair HS80 RGB Wireless Headset review
Intel Architecture day 2021: Alder Lake
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 review
Posted by: on: 06/13/2017 07:01 AM [
37 comment(s) ]
It is quad-core time with the Ryzen 5 1400 (without the X). The 1400 will be tested and overclocked to see how much value you can squeeze out of this four-core and and eight-threaded processor.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
kapu
Senior Member
Posts: 4789
Senior Member
Posts: 4789
Posted on: 06/13/2017 08:45 AM
Holy crap , it matches 6600K .. Really nice performance.
But we need results of i5 7600k and i5 7500, why no such results Hilbert ?
i5 7500 is priced 20 euro more in Poland and it is direct competition.
Holy crap , it matches 6600K .. Really nice performance.
But we need results of i5 7600k and i5 7500, why no such results Hilbert ?
i5 7500 is priced 20 euro more in Poland and it is direct competition.
jdc2389
Senior Member
Posts: 187
Senior Member
Posts: 187
Posted on: 06/13/2017 09:08 AM
Please add the gaming benchmark results at the overclocked 3.9 Hilbert! Thanks for the review.
Please add the gaming benchmark results at the overclocked 3.9 Hilbert! Thanks for the review.
AndyMutz
Senior Member
Posts: 314
Senior Member
Posts: 314
Posted on: 06/13/2017 09:10 AM
was i lucky with my chip?
mine 1400 does 3900 MHz at 1,33v on a gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3.
4000 MHz ran unstable at 1,35v and i did not want to go higher with the voltage.
-andy-
was i lucky with my chip?
mine 1400 does 3900 MHz at 1,33v on a gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3.
4000 MHz ran unstable at 1,35v and i did not want to go higher with the voltage.
-andy-
Guru3dreader
Member
Posts: 28
Member
Posts: 28
Posted on: 06/13/2017 09:32 AM
CPU-Z benchmark is a joke. I wouldn't give it even a line in a review, not a whole page. Are we going back to the times where people where using SuperPi to check performance? Especially those times when slower Intel processors where finishing it much faster?
CPU-Z benchmark is a joke. I wouldn't give it even a line in a review, not a whole page. Are we going back to the times where people where using SuperPi to check performance? Especially those times when slower Intel processors where finishing it much faster?
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 87
Nice review and a good budget chip, but I agree with the summary that the age of quad core processors is drawing to an end.
@Hilbert is there any chance you will be doing a more in depth article about memory speeds on AGESA 1.0.0.6? It would be great to see how far the speeds can be pushed using a few different configurations of both single and double DDR4 DIMMs in both 2 and 4 stick setups.