AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT review

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/18/2020 03:00 PM [ 367 comment(s) ]

Got cash to burn? It has been a long wait, but AMD has now released it's RDNA2 based products. Yes, Big Navi has been seated on the Radeon RX 6800, 6800 XT, and 6900 XT. In this article, we'll review the RX 6800 XT, which shows some really baffling rasterizer engine performance.

Read article

Advertisement

pages « 3 4 5 6 > »

Srsbsns
Senior Member

Posts: 173

Posted on: 11/18/2020 03:25 PM

So the benchmark charts are without SAM?

kapu
Senior Member

Posts: 4345

Posted on: 11/18/2020 03:29 PM

So the benchmark charts are without SAM?

Correct.

Supertribble
Senior Member

Posts: 868

Posted on: 11/18/2020 03:29 PM

Performance drops a lot in relation to Ampere at 4K, which is disappointing but it's moot with zero availability so... *shrug*

pharma
Senior Member

Posts: 1642

Posted on: 11/18/2020 03:30 PM

So the 6800XT is a little slower than 3080 in rasterization, but massively slower in Ray Tracing.
Overclocking is not there, kinda like the 3080.

AlmondMan
Senior Member

Posts: 657

Posted on: 11/18/2020 03:30 PM

I'm a bit surprised the compute performance was so lacking, since that's usually what AMD was pretty good at in the past.

They have the new CDNA cards for that.

So the benchmark charts are without SAM?
Of course. It's all done on a Intel 9900k.
So the 6800XT is a little slower than 3080 in rasterization, but massively slower in Ray Tracing.
Well also sometimes quite a lot faster?

pages « 3 4 5 6 > »

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.