AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (reference) review

Posted on: 03/28/2021 07:03 PM

---

Turbo depends on number of loaded cores.

show us how many intel cpus come without turbo.please.or don't bother responding.

attempt to put it only as 3090 discussion is taking things out of context.
You tried to take $1500 MSRP GPU as base for argument

they did
Turbo depends on number of loaded cores.
Only tiny fraction of nVidia users are not affected by this.
as if you could know that

please...stop

I gotta watch the second video,but knowing hub,it's misleading one way or another.why isn't any normal tech site reporting on this ?
im trying to find average performance charts,there is a part of a video with this title,but no charts.
why ?

Posted on: 03/28/2021 07:13 PM

---

show us how many intel cpus come without turbo.please.or don't bother responding.




as if you could know that

please...stop

I gotta watch the second video,but knowing hub,it's misleading one way or another.why isn't any normal tech site reporting on this ?
bold : Read what you quoted. My statement: "Turbo depends on number of loaded cores."
Your reply: "show us how many intel cpus come without turbo."
Where did I imply that intel's CPU have no Turbo? Your reply is complete false construct presuming I wrote something I did not!

: They shown same effect on wide variety of GPUs. You specifically took GPU with MSRP of $1500 USD as base for fallacious argument.

underlined : Only tiny portion of gaming systems are running overclocked CPUs. You know it too. Asking me to "stop" will not change reality.

Posted on: 03/28/2021 07:20 PM

---

bold : Read what you quoted. My statement: "Turbo depends on number of loaded cores."

yes,and there is a reason why it's called turbo and base is called base.I would imagine a person of your knowledge would figure it out.

: They shown same effect on wide variety of GPUs. You specifically took GPU with MSRP of $1500 USD as base for fallacious argument.
yeah I'm just seeing the second video now,wasn't aware of it before.in the first one they tried 3090 and 10100.they must've felt the response wasn't positive.

there is just about a couple of games out of those they chose where rtx2060 is comparable to 5600xt,like they are very close in performance.results are okay there,or the impact is very tiny in e.g. death stranding.
they are limiting cpus either on thread count or single core.there is certainly someting going on there on nvidia side on those.

9400f+2060 is a good,realistic example.but why is no 6/12 cpu tested in either of those videos ?

from what I can gather,hub made two videos,and while the problem was evident in the first one already,they made like 50 minutes of material and it's still impossible to judge the extent of the problem.results vary from margin of error when hardware is paired well to huge when they're testing entry level cpus with high end cards.

I still haven't got the answer to the first thing I asked thoug.Is this something nvidia can address and fix or alleviate or is it just how turing and ampere work.

Posted on: 03/28/2021 07:38 PM

---

yes,and there is a reason why it's called turbo and base is called base.I would imagine a person of your knowledge would figure it out.

yeah I'm just seeing the second video now,wasn't aware of it before.in the first one they tried 3090 and 10100.they must've felt the response wasn't positive.

there is just about a couple of games out of those they chose where rtx2060 is comparable to 5600xt,like they are very close in performance.results are okay there,or the impact is very tiny in e.g. death stranding.
they are limiting cpus either on thread count or single core.there is certainly someting going on there on nvidia side on those.

9400f+2060 is a good,realistic example.but why is no 6/12 cpu tested in either of those videos ?

from what I can gather,hub made two videos,and while the problem was evident in the first one already,they made like 50 minutes of material and it's still impossible to judge the extent of the problem.results vary from margin of error when hardware is paired well to huge when they're testing entry level cpus with high end cards.

I still haven't got the answer to the first thing I asked thoug.Is this something nvidia can address and fix or alleviate or is it just how turing and ampere work.
i5-9400F being 6C CPU. Not long ago, this very forum would argue that 6C/6T CPUs are to last for another 4 years.
And when people come to me for new system advice or to build it for them, I sometimes have to persuade them to get 6C/12T as they would be "fine" with 4C/8T.
And I even tell them that when they build new system which is to last till AM5 prices settle, they should aim for 8C16T.

So while 6C/12T CPUs may help in those constrained situations, they would have lower turbo clock. And people on the ground generally felt OKish with fewer cores.
- - - -
Thing you wrote about other tech sites not reporting similar results on not testing is simple. They decided against or have articles in works.
Because even article saying: "We did tests on this and this HW and found no difference from our OC test platform." Would be valuable and could make for big article.

So, maybe when HH is done with his tests, he may bring much more detailed data.

Posted on: 03/28/2021 08:09 PM

---

i5-9400F being 6C CPU. Not long ago, this very forum would argue that 6C/6T CPUs are to last for another 4 years.
And when people come to me for new system advice or to build it for them, I sometimes have to persuade them to get 6C/12T as they would be "fine" with 4C/8T.
And I even tell them that when they build new system which is to last till AM5 prices settle, they should aim for 8C16T.

So while 6C/12T CPUs may help in those constrained situations, they would have lower turbo clock. And people on the ground generally felt OKish with fewer cores.
- - - -
Thing you wrote about other tech sites not reporting similar results on not testing is simple. They decided against or have articles in works.
Because even article saying: "We did tests on this and this HW and found no difference from our OC test platform." Would be valuable and could make for big article.

So, maybe when HH is done with his tests, he may bring much more detailed data.
this is different kind of fish.how good or bad 6/6 is another matter.the question is how much performance hit there is across a stack of cpus,and it's a question hub have not answered.maybe it gave other tech journalists a clue to check that out tho.

6/6 was never an option for me,neither was 8/8 frankly.I only got 6/12 cause it was cheap at the time but the plan was to get 8/16 from the very beginning once they drop in price.going with intel turned out better than amd,i paid less for 10500 than 3600 and got a faster cpu,same for 10700f vs 3700x.
I'd like an example of current midrange tested,eg. 10400.

and let's not kid ourselves,a review that would find no difference would earn hub very little clicks,and one that would put nvidia in any way over amd would straight up fire up their comment section and make tremendous damage.YT channels are not like tech sites.If you wanna make money you gotta find the right people to subscribe with content suited for them.That's why when I watch a video on human evolution the next thing they're suggesting I watch is not the genesis to show me all kinds of different perspectives.