Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.24.193
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1994
GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24


New Forum Topics
[3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) AMD Announces Ryzen 7000 - passing 5.5 GHz 15% Single Thread perf Increase - RDNA2 AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 driver download and discussion NVIDIA Windows 7 GeForce Security Update Driver 473.62 AMD reaffirms that the 5.5+ GHz of the Ryzen 7000 in the presentations was achieved without overclocking NVIDIA GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download & Discussion Review: Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair MSI will debut the MEG 342C based on a QD-OLED (3440x1440) display LG offers a 47,5-inch OLED gaming display with 4K resolution with up to 138 Hz refresh rate. NVIDIA Re-Enables LHR On Its Graphics Cards With New Driver




Guru3D.com » Review » AMD Radeon R9 Fury X review 5

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X review 5

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/24/2015 01:58 PM [ 914 comment(s) ]

We review, test and benchmark the Radeon R9 Fury X, one of the most discussed products of the year. A product that is big in performance, comes with that all new HBM memory and is based on a small form factor while this initial X model, is already liquid cooled for you. But will it perform?

Read article


Advertisement



Tagged as: amd

« ASUS Radeon R7-370 STRIX Review · AMD Radeon R9 Fury X review · Corsair RM750i power supply review »

pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Omagana
Senior Member



Posts: 2532
Posted on: 06/24/2015 02:00 PM
Dem temps

0blivious
Senior Member



Posts: 3174
Posted on: 06/24/2015 02:01 PM
Underwhelmed. Thoroughly.

It's a good card at the right price, but I was really hoping AMD would steal away the performance crown. AS it is, this isn't a whole lot better than a 290X. That's sad.

Nice review HH. :)

WhiteLightning



Posts: 29368
Posted on: 06/24/2015 02:01 PM
Who will play at 4k when the fps is still so low ? I certainly would not.
I hope for amd's sake voltage will be unlocked soon so we can have some real OC results instead of with the stock voltage ones. And that it will beat 980ti.
ATM im certainly not impressed , i had hoped for higher numbers tbh.
I guess its a nice stepup from the 290x though if you are just into AMD.

AvengerUK
Senior Member



Posts: 699
Posted on: 06/24/2015 02:02 PM
Well...


....that was underwhelming



....to all those who were on the hype train, thinking it would derail a 980 Ti...Titan X and were already celebrating, THIS is why you should wait.

I'll admit to feeling a bit smug.

Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 13733
Posted on: 06/24/2015 02:06 PM
Yeah, idk. Maxwell launched what, 8 months ago? AMD has watercooling + HBM + 8 months of architecture design and this is it? I expected it to at least best the Titan X by 10-15% @ 4K in most benchmarks. It's not a bad card for the price, but just doesn't live up to the hype.

pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Guru3D.com » Articles » AMD Radeon R9 Fury X review 5

Guru3D.com © 2022