ASUS Radeon RX 6800 XT STRIX OC LC Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 XT NITRO+ review
XFX Radeon RX 6800 XT Speedster MERC 319 review
Corsair MP400 4TB NVMe M2 SSD review
ASUS ROG Z11 mini ITX chassis review
Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini chassis review
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 SUPRIM X review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X review
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT review
AMD Radeon RX 6800 review
AMD FX 8370 and 8370E processor review
Posted by: on: 09/02/2014 12:57 PM [
20 comment(s) ]
We review the AMD FX 8370 and 8370E processor today. You guys have been hearing the magic word 'Vishera' for a while now and it is the codename for the Piledriver core based FX series processors from AMD. The CPU tested today has eight physical CPU cores, it will have a base clock of 4000 MHz, and can Turbo towards 4200. And that makes the FX series a multi-threaded high frequency monster. You can read our review right here at Guru3D of course.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4
Athlonite
Senior Member
Posts: 1308
Senior Member
Posts: 1308
Posted on: 09/03/2014 12:17 AM
If you push both HT and NB to 2600MHz you'll get much better performance memory wise
If you push both HT and NB to 2600MHz you'll get much better performance memory wise
Dazz
Senior Member
Posts: 901
Senior Member
Posts: 901
Posted on: 09/03/2014 02:25 AM
Got 5GHz and HT to 2800MHz out of my processor and Ram at 2400MHz.
If you push both HT and NB to 2600MHz you'll get much better performance memory wise
Got 5GHz and HT to 2800MHz out of my processor and Ram at 2400MHz.
Marios145
Member
Posts: 33
Member
Posts: 33
Posted on: 09/03/2014 08:14 AM
It doesn't look like the new chips overclock any better so it will probably still be best to save money and go for the 8320.
Stilt disagrees!!! He just set a new record with 8 cores @8722mhz
It doesn't look like the new chips overclock any better so it will probably still be best to save money and go for the 8320.
Stilt disagrees!!! He just set a new record with 8 cores @8722mhz
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 5484
Senior Member
Posts: 5484
Posted on: 09/03/2014 02:58 PM
I have a feeling AMD has a stack full of AM3+ CPUs that haven't been released but are intentionally put on hold every time intel decides to release something. AMD probably knows these chips aren't really worth anyone's interest, but as long as they keep releasing them, they remind people "hey BTW, I still exist and I'm still kicking". In other words, as long as intel doesn't get 100% attention every time they release a new product, AMD will still be fresh in people's minds, hopefully long enough until they release something worth the attention.
I have a feeling AMD has a stack full of AM3+ CPUs that haven't been released but are intentionally put on hold every time intel decides to release something. AMD probably knows these chips aren't really worth anyone's interest, but as long as they keep releasing them, they remind people "hey BTW, I still exist and I'm still kicking". In other words, as long as intel doesn't get 100% attention every time they release a new product, AMD will still be fresh in people's minds, hopefully long enough until they release something worth the attention.
pages 1 2 3 4
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1128
I thought forsure you would be able to hit 4.9 with this processor... They are supposed to OC alittle better then a 8350.. 4.7 is a good number though if you are using air or there included AIO. Good review.
One thing about these processors is the how much you tweak the Northbridge, and if your doing sli upping the HT ups the bandwith to help with bottle necking.. I need to really get an Intel system going to compare..
Anyways if you have a lower budget this is the way to to go..