Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 CPU performance review
Posted by: on: 10/25/2012 07:05 AM [
95 comment(s) ]
In this article we'll look at all four processors, the AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 in a easy to read performance review. This article is nothing more then a performance overview of all four processors released earlier this week. So this article is basically functions as a performance chart overview.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
sdamaged99
Senior Member
Posts: 2037
Senior Member
Posts: 2037
Posted on: 10/25/2012 02:52 PM
More second rate processors by AMD. They still can't catch the aging 2500K, a quad core chip. Meh.
More second rate processors by AMD. They still can't catch the aging 2500K, a quad core chip. Meh.
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 6365
Senior Member
Posts: 6365
Posted on: 10/25/2012 03:42 PM
TBH I'd still consider the FX-8350 to be a quad core, with hardware hyperthreading. For the money it's a decent CPU.
TBH I'd still consider the FX-8350 to be a quad core, with hardware hyperthreading. For the money it's a decent CPU.
DSparil
Senior Member
Posts: 3295
Senior Member
Posts: 3295
Posted on: 10/25/2012 05:25 PM
Ahh, very nice and thank you. It appears the FX-6300 is a strong performer but that the 6100 could easily match it with a decent overclock. The 6300, while better, didn't seem to be too far ahead of its older brother in most cases.
Ahh, very nice and thank you. It appears the FX-6300 is a strong performer but that the 6100 could easily match it with a decent overclock. The 6300, while better, didn't seem to be too far ahead of its older brother in most cases.
PhazeDelta1
Senior Member
Posts: 15616
Senior Member
Posts: 15616
Posted on: 10/25/2012 06:35 PM
That's because AMD is not competing with Intel in the high end market. This is a mid range cpu. And comparing it to a high end cpu is a bit silly don't you think?
That's exactly what it is. It's still a decent step up for anyone who has an older AMD cpu and is looking to upgrade.
More second rate processors by AMD. They still can't catch the aging 2500K, a quad core chip. Meh.
That's because AMD is not competing with Intel in the high end market. This is a mid range cpu. And comparing it to a high end cpu is a bit silly don't you think?
TBH I'd still consider the FX-8350 to be a quad core, with hardware hyperthreading. For the money it's a decent CPU.
That's exactly what it is. It's still a decent step up for anyone who has an older AMD cpu and is looking to upgrade.
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1843
Thanks for the review.
It appears that among them FX-8350 looks the most interesting for general (Guru3D-like) usage, and FX-6300 for the more budget oriented rigs as the price is virtually the same as FX-4300.
Is there any chance you could add Borderlands 2 benchmark in the future? It's very CPU-limited.