ASUS Crosshair X670E HERO review
Patriot Viper Venom DDR5 6200 CL40 review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X processor review
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X review
DDR5 Ryzen 7 7700 DDR5 memory scaling review
Seasonic Arch Q503 chassis + Connect PSU review
GeForce RTX 4080/4090 announcements (preview)
Corsair HS55 Wireless Core Headset review
AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 CPU performance review
Posted by: on: 10/25/2012 07:05 AM [
95 comment(s) ]
In this article we'll look at all four processors, the AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 in a easy to read performance review. This article is nothing more then a performance overview of all four processors released earlier this week. So this article is basically functions as a performance chart overview.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
sdamaged99
Senior Member
Posts: 2037
Senior Member
Posts: 2037
Posted on: 10/25/2012 02:52 PM
More second rate processors by AMD. They still can't catch the aging 2500K, a quad core chip. Meh.
More second rate processors by AMD. They still can't catch the aging 2500K, a quad core chip. Meh.
BLEH!
Senior Member
Posts: 6307
Senior Member
Posts: 6307
Posted on: 10/25/2012 03:42 PM
TBH I'd still consider the FX-8350 to be a quad core, with hardware hyperthreading. For the money it's a decent CPU.
TBH I'd still consider the FX-8350 to be a quad core, with hardware hyperthreading. For the money it's a decent CPU.
DSparil
Senior Member
Posts: 3281
Senior Member
Posts: 3281
Posted on: 10/25/2012 05:25 PM
Ahh, very nice and thank you. It appears the FX-6300 is a strong performer but that the 6100 could easily match it with a decent overclock. The 6300, while better, didn't seem to be too far ahead of its older brother in most cases.
Ahh, very nice and thank you. It appears the FX-6300 is a strong performer but that the 6100 could easily match it with a decent overclock. The 6300, while better, didn't seem to be too far ahead of its older brother in most cases.
PhazeDelta1
Senior Member
Posts: 15616
Senior Member
Posts: 15616
Posted on: 10/25/2012 06:35 PM
That's because AMD is not competing with Intel in the high end market. This is a mid range cpu. And comparing it to a high end cpu is a bit silly don't you think?
That's exactly what it is. It's still a decent step up for anyone who has an older AMD cpu and is looking to upgrade.
More second rate processors by AMD. They still can't catch the aging 2500K, a quad core chip. Meh.
That's because AMD is not competing with Intel in the high end market. This is a mid range cpu. And comparing it to a high end cpu is a bit silly don't you think?
TBH I'd still consider the FX-8350 to be a quad core, with hardware hyperthreading. For the money it's a decent CPU.
That's exactly what it is. It's still a decent step up for anyone who has an older AMD cpu and is looking to upgrade.
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1833
Thanks for the review.
It appears that among them FX-8350 looks the most interesting for general (Guru3D-like) usage, and FX-6300 for the more budget oriented rigs as the price is virtually the same as FX-4300.
Is there any chance you could add Borderlands 2 benchmark in the future? It's very CPU-limited.