Fractal Design Focus 2 chassis review
Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Posted by: on: 05/12/2022 02:59 PM [
260 comment(s) ]
AMD has introduced FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 as a response to NVIDIA's DLSS technology. Will the refurbished FSR 2.0 offer sufficient image quality? Let's test the waters so you know what to anticipate.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
amd
pages « < 49 50 51 52
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 5593
Senior Member
Posts: 5593
Posted on: 05/23/2022 08:33 PM
I have seen you making a fuss about reviews from computerbase and HU, for not matching other reviews.
yeah,but context.
the whole thing about computerbase was completely different.it was one result completely flipping the average of the whole review,that is what I pointed out since I think it's just bad methodology to do that.I read a review,see A IS 5% FASTER THAN B.
okay,but when I go into details,a loses to b in 8 or 9 out of 10 cases.then it wins by 800fps to 500fps in the last one,hence it's faster overall.
you are way lost,dude.
and again,this situation we're discussing here has absolutely nothing to do with me questioning that computerbase review,yet you bring it up for the fifth time as if that was supposed to somehow relate to fsr2.0 testing.get a grip,cause what I'm seeing is that you don't really know what you're talking about.
I have seen you making a fuss about reviews from computerbase and HU, for not matching other reviews.
yeah,but context.
the whole thing about computerbase was completely different.it was one result completely flipping the average of the whole review,that is what I pointed out since I think it's just bad methodology to do that.I read a review,see A IS 5% FASTER THAN B.
okay,but when I go into details,a loses to b in 8 or 9 out of 10 cases.then it wins by 800fps to 500fps in the last one,hence it's faster overall.
you are way lost,dude.
and again,this situation we're discussing here has absolutely nothing to do with me questioning that computerbase review,yet you bring it up for the fifth time as if that was supposed to somehow relate to fsr2.0 testing.get a grip,cause what I'm seeing is that you don't really know what you're talking about.
Horus-Anhur
Senior Member
Posts: 4219
Senior Member
Posts: 4219
Posted on: 05/23/2022 08:46 PM
yeah,but context.
the whole thing about computerbase was completely different.it was one result completely flipping the average of the whole review,that is what I pointed out since I think it's just bad methodology to do that.I read a review,see A IS 5% FASTER THAN B.
okay,but when I go into details,a loses to b in 8 or 9 out of 10 cases.then it wins by 800fps to 500fps in the last one,hence it's faster overall.
you are way lost,dude.
and again,this situation we're discussing here has absolutely nothing to do with me questioning that computerbase review,yet you bring it up for the fifth time as if that was supposed to somehow relate to fsr2.0 testing.
The only difference is that you can't accept that DF made a bad review.
You have one review going against several others. And you choose to champion DF, for some reason.
Why are you so intent on defending a review that clearly goes against the findings of all other reviews? Why is Df so special to you?
Especially when in the past you were the first to point out errors like these.
yeah,but context.
the whole thing about computerbase was completely different.it was one result completely flipping the average of the whole review,that is what I pointed out since I think it's just bad methodology to do that.I read a review,see A IS 5% FASTER THAN B.
okay,but when I go into details,a loses to b in 8 or 9 out of 10 cases.then it wins by 800fps to 500fps in the last one,hence it's faster overall.
you are way lost,dude.
and again,this situation we're discussing here has absolutely nothing to do with me questioning that computerbase review,yet you bring it up for the fifth time as if that was supposed to somehow relate to fsr2.0 testing.
The only difference is that you can't accept that DF made a bad review.
You have one review going against several others. And you choose to champion DF, for some reason.
Why are you so intent on defending a review that clearly goes against the findings of all other reviews? Why is Df so special to you?
Especially when in the past you were the first to point out errors like these.
cucaulay malkin
Senior Member
Posts: 5593
Senior Member
Posts: 5593
Posted on: 05/23/2022 08:55 PM
And you choose to champion DF, for some reason.
total lack of comprehension
And you choose to champion DF, for some reason.
total lack of comprehension
Horus-Anhur
Senior Member
Posts: 4219
Senior Member
Posts: 4219
Posted on: 05/23/2022 08:59 PM
Right....
total lack of comprehension
Right....
pages « < 49 50 51 52
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 4219
it seems to me you are in fact confirming it's possible to obtain that result,but still bash DF for getting exactly that.
and where am I ignoring anything.
im just trying to tell you that your approach is biased.
don't spin it the other way round.
I have seen you making a fuss about reviews from computerbase and HU, for not matching other reviews.
But when I do it, I'm biased? get a grip of yourself.