PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6650 XT Gaming X review
AMD A10-7870K Godavari APU review




We review Godavari, the new A10-7870K APU from AMD. Initially intended for system-integrators who want to offer a nice APU at a reasonable price. However the 7870K today also will see the retail channel, the top dog APU from AMD is costing roughly 140 USD only and offers a nice balance in-between performance and energy consumption.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
amd
« The Witcher 3 Graphics Performance Review · AMD A10-7870K Godavari APU review
· Gigabyte GeForce GTX 970 OC Mini-ITX review »
pages 1 2 3
Turanis
Senior Member
Posts: 1780
Senior Member
Posts: 1780
Posted on: 07/27/2015 10:22 AM
Unfortunatelly the big problem of Amd Cpu is Single Core performance.
An old Q9650 3.0 Ghz (2008) with OC,say at FX 8320 3.5GHz (2012) at turbo speed 4.0GHz, will smash all AMd cpu in Single Core Perf.
So in browsing,office,multimedia enviroment an old 2008 cpu will smash "new" cpus from Amd.Not many apps are optimized for 4-6-8 cores. Sad but true.
So this A10-7870K (TDP 95W) will be again smashed by an i3 4330 3.5GHz (TDP 54W) in Single Core performance. For low profile and low TDP an i3 its a must.
I dont find A10-7870K passmark single core,but A10-7850K its almost the same:
Passmark (Single Core)
i3 4330 2,031
A10 7850K 1,578
FX 8320 1,402
i3 4360 2,150
i5 4570 2,068
i5 3570K 2,012
FX 6300 - 1,446
Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)
i3 4360 7,369
A10 7870K 4,051
i3 4330 6,784
A10 7850K 4,273
i5 4690K 7,619
i5 3570K 6,557
FX 6300 4,101
Im shocked how i3 Haswells are so good in Single Core performance.
Unfortunatelly the big problem of Amd Cpu is Single Core performance.
An old Q9650 3.0 Ghz (2008) with OC,say at FX 8320 3.5GHz (2012) at turbo speed 4.0GHz, will smash all AMd cpu in Single Core Perf.
So in browsing,office,multimedia enviroment an old 2008 cpu will smash "new" cpus from Amd.Not many apps are optimized for 4-6-8 cores. Sad but true.
So this A10-7870K (TDP 95W) will be again smashed by an i3 4330 3.5GHz (TDP 54W) in Single Core performance. For low profile and low TDP an i3 its a must.
I dont find A10-7870K passmark single core,but A10-7850K its almost the same:
Passmark (Single Core)
i3 4330 2,031
A10 7850K 1,578
FX 8320 1,402
i3 4360 2,150
i5 4570 2,068
i5 3570K 2,012
FX 6300 - 1,446
Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)
i3 4360 7,369
A10 7870K 4,051
i3 4330 6,784
A10 7850K 4,273
i5 4690K 7,619
i5 3570K 6,557
FX 6300 4,101
Im shocked how i3 Haswells are so good in Single Core performance.
Twiddles
Senior Member
Posts: 1155
Senior Member
Posts: 1155
Posted on: 07/27/2015 10:38 AM
Well we could do the same in the BIOS... add XXXMHz, tweak the GPU and there you go.
Funny to see it gets close to the 2500K in some benchmarks.
Well we could do the same in the BIOS... add XXXMHz, tweak the GPU and there you go.
Funny to see it gets close to the 2500K in some benchmarks.
Turanis
Senior Member
Posts: 1780
Senior Member
Posts: 1780
Posted on: 07/27/2015 10:46 AM
I get that example with Q9650 sk 775 at same speed to FX 8320 to see how an old architecture perform against some new architecture from Amd.
Well cant wait to see how Amd Zen will perform.
I get that example with Q9650 sk 775 at same speed to FX 8320 to see how an old architecture perform against some new architecture from Amd.
Well cant wait to see how Amd Zen will perform.

boerenlater
Senior Member
Posts: 438
Senior Member
Posts: 438
Posted on: 07/27/2015 11:46 AM
Hilbert don't you test how much you can oc it?
Hilbert don't you test how much you can oc it?
pages 1 2 3
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 7192
Small boost to iGPU